'Sharia is nothing but a human concoction of medieval religious opinion'
Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
What Rowan Williams wishes upon us is an abomination and I write here as a modern Muslim woman. He lectures the nation on the benefits of sharia law "made by bearded men, for men" and wants the alternative legal system to be accommodated within our democracy in the spirit of inclusion and cohesion.
Pray tell me sir, how do separate and impenetrable courts and schools
and extreme female segregation promote commonalities and deep bonds
between citizens of these small isles?
What he did on Thursday was to convince other Britons, white, black and
brown, that Muslims want not equality but exceptionalism and their own
domains. Enlightened British Muslims quail. Friends like this churchman
do us more harm than our many enemies. He passes round what he believes
to be the benign libation of tolerance. It is laced with arsenic.
He would not want his own girls and women, I am sure, to "choose" to be
governed by these laws he breezily endorses. And he is naive to the
point of folly if he imagines it is possible to pick and choose the
bits that are relatively nice to the girls or ones that seem to dictate
honourable financial transactions.
Look around the Islamic world where sharia rules and, in every single
country, these ordinances reduce our human value to less than half that
is accorded a male; homosexuals are imprisoned or killed, children have
no free voice or autonomy, authoritarianism rules and infantilises
populations.
What's more, different Muslim nations claim to have their own allegedly
god-given sharia. In Saudi Arabia, women cannot drive (What in Allah's
name could the Koran have warned about cars?). In Bangladesh and
Pakistan, they have no such bar to driving, although increasingly Saudi
Wahabi Islam is taking over and we see Saudi sharia taking hold.
It is growing in influence here, too. Ten years ago, the only fully
shrouded Muslim women around were from the Arab fiefdoms, the many
wives of sheikhs often drawn by cartoonists to convey the absurdity and
inhumanity of such cloaks. Now all of Europe has these girls and women
rendering themselves invisible in public spaces. It is their elected
sharia, so they claim without credibility. There is no agreed body of
sharia, it is all drafted by males and the most cruel is now claiming
absolute authority.
In Pakistan, on the statutes are strictures on adultery introduced by
the military dictator Zia ul-Haq. Women activists in that country have
given their lives protesting against the injustice of those laws where
women suspected of adultery, or rape victims, are punished in hideous
ways and the man goes free.
The Iranian theocracy changes its regulations from year to year,
capriciously playing with the lives of females. The morality police
hound women and girls, beat them up, imprison them for showing an
ankle, walking too provocatively or singing in the streets. They fight
back but are ground down eventually.
Two Iranian friends chose to die rather than live under the demeaning
religious orders. Go to Afghanistan if you fancy a 12-year-old bride “
a practice approved by the mullahs. That's sharia for you. Many women,
gay men and dissidents came to Britain to escape Islamic tyrants and
their laws. Dr Williams supports those laws and, by default, makes the
refugees victims again.
Four years ago, a Saudi woman in her fifties came to my home. She was
divorced from a Saudi prince who had sent her away and kept her
children. What she said about sharia cannot be repeated. She had money,
this princess, but no parental rights and she howled like a child in
excruciating pain in my living room.
Yet, family disputes, says Dr Williams, would be easier, within sharia.
For whom exactly? The polygamous men who live in this country, yes,
certainly. Not for their wives who will be told that God intends them
to lower their eyes and accept unjust verdicts.
Many will be sent back to bastard husbands or flinty-eyed mullahs will
take their children away. In Bradford and Halifax, they may be
forbidden to drive or work where men are employed. Adultery will be
punished. I don't think we will have public stonings but violence of
some sort will be meted out (it already is) with lawmakers' backing.
Sensing the drift in their direction, British sharia "experts" today
shamelessly direct female medical students not to wash their forearms,
essential to prevent the spread of infections, because that exposes
their flesh.
Does the Archbishop even know that sharia comes in many guises and that
several schools of jurisprudence have their own versions? The list is
long “ Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi, Hanbali, Jafari, Salafi and on and on.
Ayatollah Khomeini preferred his DIY set of crimes and punishments when
he came to power.
No women are allowed to be imams or serious jurists, so cannot help
make their own fair and free set of female-friendly sharia. All the
systems insist on ultimate truths, hard certainties. Sharia cannot
provide solutions to the complex challenges of modern life and many
violate fundamental human rights as established by the United Nations.
Taj Hargey, a historian and Islamic theologian, runs the Muslim
Education Centre in Oxford. He, with me, is a trustee of British
Muslims For Secular Democracy which is attempting to educate Muslims
out of authorised obscurantism and non-Muslims into a better
understanding of the progressive and evolutionary nature of the
practice of Islam.
He is incandescent that Dr Williams backs a perilous Islamic
conservatism, already too powerful in Britain: "Sharia is nothing but a
human concoction of medieval religious opinion, largely archaic and
outmoded and irrelevant to life today. Most sharia contradicts the
letter and spirit of the Koran, distorts the transcendental text."
During his sermons Dr Hargey explains to congregations that, for
example there is no blasphemy in the Koran, that the Prophet himself
allowed a man to mock the divine revelations. Apostasy, says the holy
text, will be dealt with by Allah in the afterlife. Sharia policemen
insist apostates should be tortured and killed.
Dr Williams says Muslims want the choice to opt for sharia. What he
believes to be choice is, in truth, inner compulsion, the result of
brainwashing which begins in the madrassas when girls and boys are
young enough to mould.
I have often admired the Archbishop's lofty thoughts, his
intellectualism, the passion for human rights, his guts when the
Government needs to be chastised. But this time his kind indulgences
betray his own invaluable principles and deliver Muslim women, girls
and dissidents into the hands of religious persecutors “ an
unforgivable intervention, which I hope he now sincerely regrets.
She said what? About who? Shameful celebrity quotes on Search Star!
No comments:
Post a Comment