The day after the U.S. administration cast
Morsi in the role of new peacekeeper, he recast himself as something
more like a new pharoah. And, despite what the New York Times and the
Washington Post wrote, he is not giving back any of the real power he's
granted himself.
Published: November 27th, 2012
The recent Hamas-Israel confrontation ended abruptly when U.S.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced last Wednesday, November
21, a ceasefire that essentially put the relatively new, largely unknown
Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in the role of peacekeeper for Israel
and Gaza.
“Egypt’s new government is assuming the responsibility and leadership that has long made this country a cornerstone of regional stability and peace,” exclaimed US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Well, Egypt had been a source of stability in the area, but Egypt’s new leader was not exactly in the mold of a Mubarak. At least not in the positive ways.
The day after the U.S. administration cast Morsi in the role of new peacekeeper, he recast himself as something more like a new pharoah. And, despite what the New York Times and the Washington Post wrote, he is not giving back any of the real power he’s granted himself.
“Egypt’s new government is assuming the responsibility and leadership that has long made this country a cornerstone of regional stability and peace,” exclaimed US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Well, Egypt had been a source of stability in the area, but Egypt’s new leader was not exactly in the mold of a Mubarak. At least not in the positive ways.
The day after the U.S. administration cast Morsi in the role of new peacekeeper, he recast himself as something more like a new pharoah. And, despite what the New York Times and the Washington Post wrote, he is not giving back any of the real power he’s granted himself.




During the eight-day military 






