Doc's Talk: The Islamic Center of Hate in the U.S.A.

Friday, April 24, 2009

The Islamic Center of Hate in the U.S.A.

Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com
4/24/2009

"This Islamic Center is predominately Sunni and considers itself “Pure Muslim.” Essentially they follow no Islamic school of thought, and follow Islam as it was practiced 1400 years under Prophet Mohammed. The leadership of the Islamic Center of Raleigh advocates an Islamic Ummah (Nation) worldwide, and under Sharia law. Violence against innocent men, women, and children to achieve these goals is strongly advocated in Sudan, and also at the Islamic Center of Raleigh. Materials published in Saudi Arabia and Sudan is used by the Center’s leadership to educate the worshippers." Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Dave Gaubatz, the first U.S. civilian (1811) Federal Agent deployed to Iraq in 2003. He is the owner of DG Counter-terrorism Publishing. He is currently conducting a 50 State Counter-terrorism Research Tour (CTRT). He can be contacted at davegaubatz@gmail.com.

FP: Dave Gaubatz,welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Although you have only been on the road a few days during your Counter-terrorism Research Tour (CTRT), do you have any interesting intelligence to report?

Gaubatz: Thank you Jamie. It has been a fast paced few days, but I will focus this interview on North Carolina. Most readers know Senator Larry Shaw (D/NC) has assumed the role as the ‘Chairman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR). On 15 April 2009, Senator Shaw contacted me and advised he was aware of my 50 State CTRT. He advised he would keep me in his “prayers and would have his staff follow my research.”

Senator Shaw had written the following to me, “Under no circumstances should innocent children be abused, assaulted, neglected or mistreated; that was one of the major driving forces for my introduction of a bill in the North Carolina General Assembly in 2007 that would require the state of North Carolina to divest from companies operating in Sudan, Darfur.”

I have not released to anyone my schedule of the states/Islamic Centers I would visit as part of my research, and on 17 April 2009, I drove to Raleigh, NC. I visited the Islamic Center of Raleigh, next door to UN State University, and only a few blocks from Senator Shaw’s Legislative office. Readers can view some photographs of my visit at www.daveg.us./

FP: What were the results?

Gaubatz: This Islamic Center is predominately Sunni and considers itself “Pure Muslim.” Essentially they follow no Islamic school of thought, and follow Islam as it was practiced 1400 years under Prophet Mohammed. The leadership of the Islamic Center of Raleigh advocates an Islamic Ummah (Nation) worldwide, and under Sharia law. Violence against innocent men, women, and children to achieve these goals is strongly advocated in Sudan, and also at the Islamic Center of Raleigh. Materials published in Saudi Arabia and Sudan is used by the Center’s leadership to educate the worshippers.

Based on my U.S. government training, travels throughout the Middle East, years of self study of Islam/Sharia law, and professional CT training by people associated with Islamic terrorist groups, I believe before Senator Shaw begins focusing on Sudan, he should first “clean” his own house in Raleigh, NC. Shaw informed me he had introduced a NC bill as stated above to “divest from companies operating in Sudan,” yet he allows violent Islamic material from Sudan to be taught to the children in Raleigh, NC.

FP: Can you be more specific as to what is taught at the Islamic Center of Raleigh?

Gaubatz: It is important for not only Raleigh citizens to be concerned, but all citizens throughout America that the leadership of this Islamic Center follows the teachings of Atlanta’s cop killer, “Imam, Jamil Al-Amin, convicted terrorist supporter Ali Al Timimi, Sheikh Ghassan Al-Barqawee, Dr. Bilal Phillips (who has tried to justify in prior lectures why marrying six year old children as the Prophet Mohammed did 1400 years ago is still a noble trait for Muslim men), and by the founder of the terrorist group Jamaat-e-Islami (Abul Maududi).

During my visit at the Islamic Center of Raleigh, I obtained several hours of Jihadist lectures by Jamil Amin and others calling for Muslims worldwide to unite and use physical Jihad to implement Sharia law not only in Sudan, Somali, Pakistan, or Afghanistan, but in America as well.

FP: Have you informed Senator Shaw of your findings?

Gaubatz: I have no doubts Senator Larry Shaw already knows the results of my research. He had informed me he would have his staff monitor my research. He wasn’t clear if he meant his CAIR staff or his elected office staff in NC. I have little doubt he is being true to his word and is monitoring my research. He and other Islamic leaders have always hidden behind “religious walls,” use the First Amendment (Free Speech) to our Constitution, and now the leadership of President Barack Obama to justify the violence being advocated in Raleigh, and/or he will use the same reasoning Obama used when confronted by the radical/anti-American views of Reverend Jeremiah Wright and terrorist Bill Ayers. They will ‘play ignorant’ and hope it will all go away.

What is most frightening is that Senator Larry Shaw and many Islamic organizations/scholars have used the above for so many years in America and it has and does work. They have terrorized our law enforcement and innocent Americans from being fearful of lawsuits and potential violence against themselves that their activities will continue to be allowed. How many Raleigh law enforcement officers attend this Islamic Center and keep the leaders “aware” of potential investigations?

What Senator Shaw is concerned about is whether I allow the issue to drop. Will I continue researching the activities within Raleigh? Do I already have more evidence than I am revealing in this interview?

FP: What do you suggest concerned citizens do?

Gaubatz: Always stay one step above Islamic leaders who advocate violence against innocent men, women, and children. Stay within legal boundaries but do not be afraid of lawsuits or threats from Islamic organizations and/or politicians who support an Islamic Ummah in America under Sharia law. Do not be intimidated by name calling such as Islamophobe, racist, or ‘right wing extremist’. When you have the truth on your side it is very, very difficult for supporters of Islamic terrorists to do anything aside from the above.

Call Senator Shaw’s office and give him the benefit of the doubt to answer the above. Let’s assume he is “ignorant” as President Obama claimed to be pertaining to Reverend Wright. Put Senator Shaw on the spot. Ask him if he would provide a sworn statement under oath denying any of the evidence I mentioned above is being advocated just a few blocks from his Raleigh office. Demand from politicians and authorities at the local, state, and federal level to investigate. Demand law enforcement investigates the Islamic Center of Raleigh. Or simply sit back as many Americans currently do and allow Sharia law to continue “creeping into our society.” Our children will live with it. There are in reality only a few choices.

FP: Which state will you conduct research in next?

Gaubatz: After NC, I again conducted more research in TN. Per the words of some Al Farooq (Somali worshippers) on 18 Apr 2009, the city is referred by them as “SOMALILAND”. Although now living in Nashville, they have not left behind the ideology of Sharia law. The next state to be researched is only known to me.

FP: Keep up the good work sir.

Gaubatz: Thank you Jamie.
Jamie Glazov is Frontpage Magazine's editor. He holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is the author of Canadian Policy Toward Khrushchev’s Soviet Union and is the co-editor (with David Horowitz) of The Hate America Left. He edited and wrote the introduction to David Horowitz’s Left Illusions. His new book is United in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and Terror. To see his previous symposiums, interviews and articles Click Here. Email him at jglazov@rogers.com.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk