Wednesday, October 14, 2009

From Jesus to Judge Goldstone

“Your father is the devil and you desire to do what gives him pleasure. He always was a murderer and standeth not in truth because truth is not in him. When he says what is false, he does what is natural to him, for he is a liar and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe not.” John 8:44


This verse inspired Martin Luther's extremely anti-Semitic book titled The Jews and Their Lies in 1543. In this book he accused Jews of being liars and thieves and blamed just about every bad thing in the world on “the Jews”. He also requested in this book that the Catholic Church cast the Jews out of Europe, and it was the Church's failure to comply with this request, among others, that convinced Martin Luther to break with the Catholic Church. Five centuries later a German Member of Parliament added in his anti-Semitic rant the feature that M. Luther omitted from St. John's charges. He called Jews a Taetervolk, a nation of murderers. Like their God in Jesus' rant. The Nazis proclaimed that “Jehova, whom the Jews worship is the greatest of all criminals.” By December 1948, a distinguished contingent of Jewish scientists and intellectuals warned in The New York Times that those leading the effort to establish a Jewish state bear "the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party". Albert Einstein joined concerned Jews who cautioned Americans "not to support this latest manifestation of fascism. "The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party, and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism." Albert Einstein, The New York Times, 4 December 1948


In a biting editorial entitled “While the Jews Die,” The Nation reminded readers in 1942 that Hitler was carrying out a program of total extermination of Europe’s Jews and charged, “in this country, you and I and the President and the Congress and the State Department are accessories to the crime and share Hitler’s guilt.” “What,” asked The Nation, “has come over the minds of ordinary men and women that makes it seem normal and indeed inevitable that this country should solidly stand by and do nothing in the face of one of the world’s greatest tragedies?” The editorial printed and strongly endorsed the eleven-point rescue program. A “distinguished contingent of Jewish scientists” includingEinstein failed to endorse this rescue program. The death of six million innocent, helpless Jews, including one million children, did not move their consciences.


But killing some two hundred and fifty men, women and children in the village Deir Yasin by Irgun under the command of Menachem Begin aroused their moral indignation and inspired them with labeling the nascent Jewish state as allegedly bearing “the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party.” Begin's Irgun was outside the command of the Haganah and he ignored Hagana's warning against the attack. Of course the US media did not care to mention that fact or to label the Irgun as “sober killers” as they do in case of Palestinian terrorists. If you are a “sober killer” you can even get the money raised by the Islamic organizations in this country. Menachem Begin or his Irgun did not get one penny from the American Jews, rather they were branded in the same words as Einstein and his colleagued used in their petition.


A. Einstein suffered from dyslexia a disorder which makes it impossible for the affected person to understand the contents of what he reads. So, Einstein probably did not read a 7 December 1946 Nation column by Julio Alvarez del Vayo. Mr. Del Vayo, a socialist who had been Foreign Minister of the Spanish Republic before it was overthrown by Francisco Franco's thugs, knew fascism first hand. He did not view Arab leaders such as Haj Amin al-Husseini, the former Mufti of Jerusalem, as heroes of National Liberation. That perspective was imposed after the fact, starting in the 1960s, when young leftists adopted a starry-eyed view of anything that smacked of Third World Revolution. Rather, he saw them as fascists, experts in antisemitism and murder, offering their expertise to Big Power patrons. Observing that the British were utilizing notorious Nazi operatives such as Haj Amin al-Husseini in their divide-and-conquer strategy, del Vayo wrote that the Fascists did not then have a significant political base.


The so-called irreconcilable conflict between Arabs and Jews, according to del Vayo, was another bluff invented out of whole cloth by the big powers to serve their special interests. He described the day at Geneva, in the early twenties, when at a private dinner Feisal (Emir Feisal, son of the leader of the Arab revolt against the Turks) openly expressed himself in support of the Zionist cause. At that time the other Arab countries were much less concerned about Palestine. The "war" between Jews and Arabs started later, as a result of the work done by [Anglican] Bishop Rennie Macinnes, a notorious anti-Semite who was sent by the British to Jerusalem, and by Cardinal Barlassina, the Vatican representative.It was a Duet then rather than a Quartet. With the aid of General Storrs, who was then governor of Jerusalem, they brought the Mufti's family to power, supplying funds and other forms of help in an effort to delay the logical solution of the Palestine problem.


Consistent with British tolerance for and apparent employment of Nazi war criminals against new-born Israel, The Nation memorandum shows that the British adopted a propaganda line reminiscent of the Nazis’ “Jewish-Bolshevist plot” which five years later was embraced by the ill-famous Senator McCarthy. The British accused Jewish Holocaust survivors trying to get to Palestine of being Soviet Communist infiltrators.

The Nation Associates presented the facts in their memorandum as essential to a wise and just decision. An examination of these facts show that the post-war violence in Palestine resulted from:

1.

British sabotage of Partition – This British sabotage was deliberately undertaken in order to insure British base rights in Palestine in perpetuity, as well as to safeguard British oil and trade and military interests in the Middle East
2.

British Alliance with Arab League – Within a month after the November 29th resolution, the Arabs were encouraged to believe partition would be substituted by a Federal State, and arms shipments continued to the Arab States despite their known use for Palestine warfare. On April 28, 1948 Foreign Minister Bevin was still refusing to halt them.

The British have also allowed 10,000 foreign invaders to enter Palestine, offering the feeble excuse that the British armed forces, consisting, at the outset, of over 80,000 men, could not adequately protect the border. Through their action they have admitted into Palestine Arabs of known Nazi allegiance in command of the invading forces, and have even admitted escaped Nazi prisoners of war, now to be found in command of Arab detachments. (See, http://emperor.vwh.net/history/br.htm


The British policy in the Mandate Palestine was consistent with the relentless promotion of Nazi ideology in Great Britain by the upper classes which prompted these people to donate in the 1930s to Hitler and his thugs millions for their anti-Semitic, genocidal propaganda. The intelligence documents cited in A Memorandum Submitted to the Special Session of the General Assembly of the United Nation in April 1948 by The Nation Associates show that before the 15 May 1948 invasion, British intelligence knew that the Arabs terrorizing the future Israel were being led in part by Nazi advisers. These included Bosnian Muslims from the infamous Handzar Division of the Waffen SS. According to a French intelligence document published by The Nation seven month later, the British sent thousands of Nazi prisoners of war, including top war criminals, to assist the Arab attack. This was after the Arab invasion. In other words the Hagana and Begin's Irgun faced the same criminals who murdered millions of Jews in the death camps in Europe.

But that would not justify the killing of the Arab villagers in Deir Yasin.


In his memoirs entitled The Revolt Begin wrote that repeated loudspeaker warning in Arabic advised noncombatants to evacuate the village from which murderous fire was being directed against the Irgunist irregulars. This was corroborated by a prominent inhabitant of the village Ahmed Assad, who years later (April 9, 1953) was quoted by Al Urdun, a Jordanian newspaper, as saying: “Jews never intended to hurt the population of the village, but were forced to do so after they met enemy fire from the population, which killed an Irgun commander. The Arab exodus from other villages was not caused by the actual battle, but by the exaggerated descriptions spread by Arab leaders to incite them to fight the Jews.” (Frank Gervasi, The Case for Israel. 1967, p.87)


The Nazi Assault on the Jewish State Continued


An info about the beginning of Y. Arafat's terrorist career which is not to be found in his Wiki biography is very revealing in the context of the Nation's Memorandum. During the post-Farouk era, the Grand Mufti held court at a closely guarded villa on Sharia Assuit Street in Heliopolis, a suburb of Cairo. There he entertained delegations from throughout the Arab world while maintaining close contact with Nazis from Germany and other countries. Among those who gathered at the Mufti’s house during the mid-1950s was the distant cousin, Yassir Arafat, then an engineering student at the University of Cairo. Former Major General Otto Ernst Remer, Fűhrer’s chief bodyguard, who would collaborate with Arafat in the years ahead, also visited the esteemed Grossmufti on several occasions. They share fond recollections of A. Hitler and indulged in the usual talk of driving the Jews into the sea. The Grand Mufti’s network of sympathizers extended far and wide. Otto Skorzeny also collaborated with the Muslim religious leader. According to A.F.X. Baron, a prominent British fascist, Skorzeny was instrumental in funneling more than a million dollars, which the Mufti had raised for anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish propaganda, to various no-Nazi groups around the world.


Several German propaganda experts adopted Arabic names when they emigrated to Egypt. Johann von Leers, one of the Third Reich’s most prolific Jew-baiters, converted to Islam and became Omar Amin. He got a job with the Egyptian Information Ministry, thanks to the good offices of the Grossmufti. With von Leers in charge, Cairo’s anti-Israeli propaganda machine churned out hate literature and inflammatory broadcasts on a regular basis. Assisting von Leers were dozens of European Nazis who welcomed a fresh opportunity to continue their vendetta against the Jews. They had regular access to Radio Cairo, which utilized a powerful CIA-constructed transmitter to spread the message throughout much of the Arab world.


As the leader of the General Union of Palestinian Students (GUPS) in Egypt, Arafat was invited to attend a Socialist International meeting of students in Prague in 1955. To travel there, Arafat and his companions stowed away on a Greek cargo ship AGAMEMNON to Greece. (I went to Israel for my one year study at the Hebrew University aboard the same ship in 1964)

Al Fatah was founded in secret by Khalil al-Azir, known as Abu Jihad, and Yasir Arafat in later 1959 (Four years after Arafat's trip to Prague) in Kuwait which was then a British protectorate. But Palestinian date its birth to Jan. 1, 1965, when Al Fatah launched a first armed attack into Israel from southern Lebanon, an attack thwarted by the Lebanese. (New York Times, Jan 1, 2005)


“The Holocaust” in Lebanon

The jihadi-salafist imagination deals in racial essences and historical stereotypes: In their view, the Jews are inherently malevolent (Jehova is the greatest of all criminals), using the USA (the Israel Lobby), the IMF, the World Bank and the UN (!) for their nefarious purposes. This explains the bizarre concept of “Crusader-Zionists”

The PLO opened some 35 industrial concerns, manufacturing a variety of consumer goods, in and around Beirut, with Arafat as chief executive officer of this PLO, Inc. In addition to these legitimate activities, PLO militants carried out bank robberies, and kidnappings, making their own contributions to the destabilization of one of the few parliamentary democracies ever to have existed in the Middle East. (M. Burleigh, Blood and Rage, p. 157)

No wonder then that from the very beginning, Fatah cadres were jailed in Lebanon and elsewhere. Some Arab states criticized Fatah for not coordinating with them or for “regionalism” – Palestinian rather than an Arab nationalism. The pro-Nasser newspaper al-Anwar in Beirut called them CIA agents while the Saudis labeled them as Communists. By mid-1967, some 250 Palestinians suspected of being Fatah’s members and sympathizers were in various Arab states’ Prisons.



Increasingly open clashes between the Palestinians and government forces led President Franjieh to authorize the Lebanese air force to dive-bomb the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps, which were hotbeds of Palestinian militancy. (Ib. p. 174) It was before the Falangists' attack on the same camps, a year or so later.

A pattern of violence that continued over 30 years later involved relatively underreported Palestinian cross-border attacks (Cp. the shelling Israel with missiles by Hamas), to which the Israelis regularly responded with either air strikes or expeditions using their prodigious Armour, a spectacle that enabled the Palestinians to posture as David versus Goliath to an international media that always found the response more newsworthy than whatever provoked it, not being interested either, in who ordered the guerrilla fighters on the border to attack Israel.

Given his analysis, the terrorist strategy was logical. The PLO’s attacks, Arafat said in 1968, were designed “to prevent immigration and encourage emigration…to destroy tourism, to prevent immigrants becoming attached to the land, to weaken the Israeli economy and to divert the greater part of it to security requirements. By achieving these objectives, the PLO would “inevitably” prevent Israel’s consolidation and bring its disintegration. In these early years, Arafat hoped that “a quick blow by the regular armies at the right moment” would then finish Israel off. Hamas was pursuing the same goals.



Sharon came away from meetings with Haig in May 1982 convinced that he had the green light for major operations in Lebanon...

An Associated Press report on 15 September 1982 stated:

Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, in a statement, tied the killing [of the Phalangist leader Gemayel] to the PLO, saying: "It symbolises the terrorist murderousness of the PLO terrorist organisations and their supporters." Habib Chartouni, a Lebanese Christian from the Syrian Socialist National Party confessed to the murder of Gemayel, and no Palestinians were involved. Sharon had used this to instigate the entrance of the Lebanese militias into the camps.

In its 21 February 1983 issue, Time published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Although the jury concluded that the Time story included false allegations, they found that Time had not acted with "actual malice" and so was not guilty of libel.

Andrew Sullivan, writing in the Sunday Times of London (Dec. 20), said Israel: “has become, among many European elites, the object of hate that dares not speak its name…Not since the 1930s has such blithe hatred of Jews gained this much acceptability in world opinion…Sixty years ago such hatred of Jews – unchallenged, appeased, excused, ignored – led directly to Auschwitz. Its prevalence now in the Middle East should remove any doubt about the morality of Israel’s self-defense in these perilous times and shame anyone who traffics in it…No US paper ever condemned the previous attack on the same camps by the Lebanese air force.

The Israelis failed to notice the shocking effect of sustained aerial bombing and shelling on wider internatioional opinion, one of the major flaws in their future responses to cross-border terrorism. This prompted a tense telephone exchange between Reagan and Begin. 'Menachem, this is a holocaust,' the President remarked. 'Mr President, I'm aware of what a holocaust is, the Israeli leader replied. The bombing ceased and the PLO prepared to embark on its third exodus, having brought nothing but chaos and violence in Lebanon. Nearly eleven thousand Palestinian fighters were shipped out on vessels chartered by the US, and payed by the US taxpayers. Arafat himself left for Greece on the Atlantis, his final destination being Tunis. He left a city in ruins with nineteen thousand dead and another thirty thousand wounded. Four hundred Israelis also died. As they negotiated their evacuation with R. Reagan's envoy, Habib, the PLO team were insistent on the shipment of their fleet of BMWs and Mercedes, and other manifestations of the good life in their Beirut strongholds. (ib 186)

On April 14, 1982, Reagan commended Prof. Roger Pearson's “valuable service”, voiced appreciation for his “substantial contribution to promoting and upholding those ideas and principles that we value at home and abroad.” In late 1950s, R. Pearson helped to found the northern League and the journal Northlander, an initiative designed to foster the “interests and solidarity of all Teutonic Nations.”


Arafat was on the high seas when Reagan began his nationally televised address, in which he stated for the first time that the US won't support the occupation of Judea and Samaria. In his own words, Arafat quit Beirut because his Moslem allies begged, “Please, Yassir, (Please, Nasrallah, Haniyeh) this is enough: 52, 000 killed and wounded, almost half of them Lebanese!” Today, Arafat admits, “They had a right to say that. I felt because I began to feel the responsibility of killing their children.” And yet it was not Y. Arafat who was accused by American press of war crimes, but Israeli commander-in-chief Gen. A. Sharon. According to the Annual 1983 of The Encyclopedia Americana that was what happened.

In 1991, Y. Arafat was being skewered in the Arab media. Musa Sabri, an Egyptian journalist felt free to write these stinging words: “You are a corrupt war criminal, you clown. You betrayed those who fed you and meanly stabbed those who helped you. You are the clown of every circus…It is time you retire away from us, you treacherous bloodsucker.” (Cited in Uri Kupferschmidt, Egypt, 1993, p. 361) Musa Sabri had written his “fatwa” when International peace conference, with participation by Palestinians under PLO control, was being convoked to Madrid, Spain. The Egyptian government closed down the one and only English-language newspaper in the country. The corrupt war criminal was received 14 times by Pope John Paul II and 6 times by Pres. B. Clinton.

U.S. President Never Called Yeltsin to stop the “Holocaust” in Chechnya

Encountering resistance in Grozny, most of whose citizens were ethnic Russians, the Russians spent five weeks bombarding the city with heavy artillery and waves of bombers. As the Chechen rebels had fallen back to wage a guerrilla campaign from the mountains, most of the twenty-seven thousand dead in the ruined city were innocent civilians, who unlike the Chechens had no village teips or clans to seek sanctuary within.

The Chechen wars were fought with terrible brutality on both sides, even before the Chechens resorted to spectacular terrorist violence. The Chechens used mines and ambushes to disrupt Russian movement, while the Russians many of whose commander were routinely drank, pulverized towns and villages with artillery fire that took no account of a civilian presence. Torture of prisoners was similarly normal on both sides. After the Russians killed eleven members of Basayev's family by dropping two six-ton bombs on his uncle's house, fatalities which included the rebel commander's wife and child, no captured Russian pilot would survive.

A Second Chechen War erupted in August 1999 as the Russians sought to reverse the de facto independence that Maskhadov had achieved in the first war against Russia's conscript rabble. From a Russian perspective there were various grounds to restart the war. General lawlessness and kidnapping for huge ransoms were endemic in Chechnya, while the Chechen diaspora in Russia itself was heavily involved in organized crime. Obviously there were many gangsters from other nationalities, but the Chechens enjoyed a reputation for blood feuds and savagery low even by local standards...

Using air power and contract professional soldiers rather than hapless conscripts, the Russians attacked Chechen separatists that autumn. They dropped cluster bombs and hit villages with artillery shells and rockets, without any regard for civilian casualties. The Russians dominated the northern Chechen plains and pulverized the ruins of Chechnya's cities. In February 2000 they took Grozny after weeks of fighting that had reduced it to the condition of Dresden in 1945.

Support the Palestinian Terrorists and the Arabs will forgive all your Murders

On April 27, 2002 the Eurasian Party of Russia, an influential Muslim political group gathered to a congress in Moscow. Gadzhi Makhachev, a representative of Dagestan at the congress called for Ariel Sharon to be hanged and the delegates responded with enthusiastic applause. The congress was attended by some leading Russian nationalists. In every issue, Zavtra, (See below) a leading Russian ultranationalist and anti-Semitic weekly praised “Comrade Arafat” and justifies Palestinian suicide bombers, calling them heroic fighters who are punishing the Israeli occupiers (See, Jewish Sentinel, June 1-13, 02, pp. 6,27). Recall that “Comrade Arafat” was embraced by Pope John Paul II 14 times!

According to Michael Burleigh (Blood and rage. A Cultural History of Terrorism), the destruction of WT Center caused a major shift in Bush's Middle East policy; after the attack, in an act of an appeasement, his administration started supporting establishment of an independent Palestinian state. On June 12, 2002 Barry Schweid of the Associated Press reported “Powell Says Palestinians May Have An Interim State; U.S. Intends To Deal With Arafat”. Powell told reporters that the administration was talking to other countries about setting up a provisional Palestinian state and taking up the idea at a Mideast Peace Conference this summer. Without saying which countries, Powell said, “an interim state would create a ‘political horizon’”.

JTA DAILY BRIEFING Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006,12:02pm

The Bush administration wants Palestinian Authority elections to take place Jan. 25 as scheduled, with voting in eastern Jerusalem as well.


Now, Prochanov editor-in-chief of the above mentioned neo-Nazi Zavtra expressed Jan 25, 2006 his deep satisfaction with the victory of Hamas even before it was officially announced. Zavtra is a Russian counterpart of the neo Nazi New Order organ of the American Branch of NSDAP published in Nebraska by one Gary Lauck.

В Москве всегда уважали и будут уважать демократический выбор палестинского народа (ITAR-TASS): Moscow will always approve of democratic choice of Palestinian people.

Steven Cook, Mideast specialist and fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations asked in his interview for Ted Phillips How will the U.S. deal with Hamas answered: “I think we’re going to follow the Israeli lead. If the United States seeks to isolate or undermine a Hamas-dominated government, it will reveal, from the Arab perspective, the U.S. efforts to promote change and democracy in the region as a sham.”


The Bush policy of of promoting Hamas's election victory was closely following the British sabotage of Partition which was deliberately undertaken in order to insure British base rights in Palestine in perpetuity, as well as to safeguard British oil and trade and military interests in the Middle East


And now, consider these publications; in an article in the Saudi daily Al-Riyadh, ‘Adel Bin Zayd Al-Tarifi, a Saudi researcher at the European Research Institute of Birmingham, U.K. presented a scathing critique of the Hamas leadership and its willingness to forgo international aid and live off “wild thyme and olives.” The author assured his readers that Hamas Doesn’t Truly Believe in Democracy; Nazis in Germany and Fascists in Italy also won at the Ballot Box. (www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD117706). Tzipi Livni was inspired by this article when in Moscow she stated that "Elections are not some kind of a washing machine whereby a terrorist organization can wash itself. Terror is terror.” And genocide is genocide.


(07.03.06, 14:12)

Mkhaimar Abusada, a political science professor at Al Azhar University who recently organized a conference on the Gaza economy, where business leaders aired their grievances concurs with the Opinion of Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni: “The Gaza Strip is full of thugs these days. As a Palestinian I’am ashamed to say that, but it is part of the problem.” (The New York Times, As Gaza’s Plight Worsens, Palestinian Businesses Leave, July 4, 2006). The Hamas thugs match the Nazi SA.

Hundreds, possibly thousands of neo-Nazis and "white power" extremists have infiltrated U.S. forces in a deliberate strategy to get training in weapons, urban warfare and covert operations, the Pentagon's own investigators report. This infestation is being actively abetted by the Bush regime. Who says? Well, Defense Department investigator Scott Barfield, for one. "Recruiters are knowingly allowing neo-Nazis and white supremacists to join the armed forces, and commanders don't remove them from the military even after we positively identify them as extremists or gang members," Barfield told the Southern Poverty Law Center in a report issued last week.


The percentage of "moral waivers" being granted to recruits for past misdeeds -- and for previously disqualifying factors such as violent extremism or gang membership -- has "more than doubled since 2001," the Chicago Sun-Times reports. Some recruiters are even helping skinheads cover up their telltale Nazi tattoos to get them into the military, Barfield says. Meanwhile, officers in the field are routinely failing to report obvious neo-Nazi activity, and those now-uncovered tattoos, when they spot them. Wouldn’t that explain what happened in Abu Ghraib and other places? Reassessment of Hitler’s genius helped them much.

In an interview in 2002, Samantha Powers, who serves as a senior member of Obama's national security council, effectively called for the US to invade Israel in support of the Palestinians.


Sheldon Cohen’s Israel, Foreign Preference – Foreign Influence Cases in Insight Magazine of the Washington Times of June 27 to July 4, 2006 should be read in this context. We learn from the article that the Pentagon asks American Jewish applicants for security clearance the question: “Would you be willing to join a U.S. attack on Israel and abandon your relatives if the Jewish State was threatened?” By posing such a question the Pentagon has sought to increasingly restrict access to American Jews with relatives in Israel for jobs in the FBI, CIA, NSA, etc. The applicants know that The Pentagon would like them to fight against the country where their religion and soul resides only because Arabists, slaved to oil, want the only Jewish nation to be obliterated as the Europeans – at the behest of the German Nazis attempted to do to show their gratitude to their Islamofascist collaborator Hajj Amin el-Husseini.

Al Arabiya Monday, 12 October 2009

No Israeli will face Gaza war crimes charges

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday that Israel would not allow its citizens to be tried for alleged war crimes over its deadly assault on Gaza as Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas defended his controversial decision to support deferring a vote on a damning United Nation report on Gaza

"This warped document... written by this warped committee undermines Israel's right to self defense. This report encourages terror and endangers the peace," he said, repeating comments he made at the annual U.N. Meanwhile Abbas said the Palestinian delegation at the Geneva-based council backed the Oct. 2 postponement of a vote on the so-called Goldstone report which was highly critical of Israel in order to gather maximum support for the measure

١٤٣٠/١٠/٢١٠/٢٥/٢٥٢٥.poles4israel, Roman Pytel, Ph.D

2 comments:

kupferschmidt said...

I never wrote this:
In 1991, Y. Arafat was being skewered in the Arab media. Musa Sabri, an Egyptian journalist felt free to write these stinging words: “You are a corrupt war criminal, you clown. You betrayed those who fed you and meanly stabbed those who helped you. You are the clown of every circus…It is time you retire away from us, you treacherous bloodsucker.” (Cited in Uri Kupferschmidt, Egypt, 1993, p. 361)
Can you please tell me from where this was quoted ??
Prof. Uri M. Kupferschmidt
University of Haifa
kpfrschm@research.haifa.ac.il

GS Don Morris, Ph.D./Chana Givon said...

Professor-Your comment is presented-it was part of the afore-mentioned piece-apologies due to you from that author