Doc's Talk: Viva Palestina's Gleeful PIJ Meeting

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Viva Palestina's Gleeful PIJ Meeting

IPT News

http://www.investigativeproject.org/2289/viva-palestina-gleeful-pij-meeting

Algerian and Turkish members of a Viva Palestina (VP) convoy that brought aid to the Gaza government run by the terrorist group Hamas also met with another radical organization previously not publicly linked to VP – the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.. An Investigative Project on Terrorism investigation uncovered the Algerian visit, while the Turkish meeting was first reported by the Israeli media outlet Ynetnews on Monday.

These convoy participants visited members of the Al Quds Brigades, the military wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), according to one story posted on the Al Quds Brigades website, as well as another originally posted on the Brigades website, and reposted to a Palestinian chat room.

PIJ, an Iranian-inspired terrorist group, seeks to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamic State by carrying out jihad, like Hamas. The terrorist group is responsible for carrying out dozens of suicide bombings in Israel, one which killed 20 civilians, including two Americans, in 1996. PIJ was first officially named a terrorist group by the United States following a 1995 executive order by President Bill Clinton. The group has received support from individuals living in the United States. Most notable is Sami Al-Arian, a former University of South Florida professor who served on the PIJ governing board while living in Tampa. He pled guilty in to conspiring to provide goods and services to PIJ in 2006.

Four Algerians on the Viva Palestina 5 convoy "praised God greatly" after they heard that they would be able to visit members of the Brigades. Upon entering an Al Quds Brigades' military post on a northwest road in Gaza, "the Algerians did not wait for the van to stop before they jumped from it to prostrate themselves to God Almighty in thanks that they were able to see the Gaza Mujahidin and shake hands with them." The Algerians planned "to kiss their feet," but instead, the terrorist operatives said, "'Your coming to Gaza to help us is a Jihad itself'" [Emphasis added].

One Algerian, who participated in the May flotilla to Gaza that ended in a deadly clash with Israeli soldiers, said, "I was on the last Freedom Flotilla on board the ship, and the cowards [Israelis] attacked us. I sought martyrdom and many of us were hit. The Zionists took us to the port of Ashdod" [Emphasis added].

The Al-Quds Brigades terrorists also took the Algerian delegation to buildings where the Israeli army had been located. One Algerian shouted, "Where are they? I want to kill them! They killed my Palestinian brothers." Before the delegation left, "they held Kalashnikovs and began to kiss them and raise them high repeating, 'By this we shall triumph. By this we shall liberate our al Aqsa'" [Emphasis added].

According to the article, this meeting was not the first time Gaza aid convoys have met with PIJ or other terrorist groups: "Arab and foreign men-in-solidarity who came to Gaza on board ships and in siege breaking convoys had previously met with men of the Resistance in their various groups."

In a separate instance during the convoy's visit to Gaza, a Turkish delegation of the convoy, accompanied by leaders of the Al Quds Brigades, toured a number of the brigade's military posts. One Turkish man said to the Al Quds Brigades group:

"You are the pride and glory of the Umma. Upon you we rely to confront the criminal Zionist entity whose aggression against the Palestinian has not stopped," and "I am very proud to stand among dear brothers, Mujahidin, heroes, who risk their lives; proceed in the Way of God; have before their eyes the cause of their Ummah and people; sacrifice much; and expend blood for the sake of liberation and independence and to restore their plundered rights" [Emphasis added].

Pictures of two Turkish men, with their faces blurred, were posted on the Al Quds Brigades' website. One man put on the Brigades' uniform, and posed with PIJ terrorists while holding weapons and rocket launchers. The photos were removed shortly after they were posted.

By meeting with terrorists, the Viva Palestina convoys to Gaza are condoning terrorism and elevating the status of the Hamas regime in the Gaza Strip, rather than delivering aid to needy Palestinians. Hamas official Fathi Hamad, the interior minister in Gaza, articulated this concept when stating this week:

"We are coming to occupy Haifa and Akko. We'll have armies from all around the world, and the convoys arriving in Gaza are carrying a message to our people, saying that we must stick to the path of jihad. The enemy is trying to impose a siege on us, but they are the ones under a siege and behind fences" [Emphasis added].

The convoy spent four days in Gaza before leaving Sunday. Like previous trips, the group was warmly received by the top echelons of Hamas; including Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, Deputy Hamas foreign minister Ahmed Youssef, and Hamas hardliner Mahmoud Zahar, a co-founder of the terrorist group.

At a sermon delivered on October 22nd to the convoy at a mosque, Haniyeh said the arrival of the group was a step towards "the liberation of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa mosque, the restoration of the territories of Palestine and the lifting of the siege of the Gaza Strip." He also echoed Hamas' charter dedicated to destroying the Jewish State of Israel and replacing it with an Islamic state when saying that "Palestine" (all areas of Israel proper) would remain Palestinian, Arab and Muslim, according to a report released Thursday by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center.

Convoy spokesperson and Hamas operative living in the UK, Zaher Birawi, delivered a speech as well, after which those present at the mosque shouted "We will redeem you Al-Aqsa with our lives and blood" [Emphasis added].

At a ceremony held later that day, the convoy and its leaders were honored by Ismail Haniyeh and other senior Hamas leaders. The next day, they visited the graves of Hamas leaders Sheik Ahmed Yassin, Abdel Aziz Rantisi and Sayid Siyyam, where they mixed the soil of their graves with those of Turkish activists killed abroad the IHH Mavi Marmara ship that was part of the May flotilla. IHH operatives on the ship deliberately orchestrated the violent confrontation with Israel in the Mediterranean Sea.

Yassin and Rantisi were designated as Specially Designated Global Terrorists by the U.S. Department of Treasury in 2003. Yassin, the founding leader of Hamas, was assassinated by the Israeli army in 2004. He personally encouraged and approved the operation of three of the most deadly suicide bombings in Israel and the death of hundreds of Israeli citizens.

At a seminar in Beirut on Tuesday, VP founder and leader George Galloway said that Viva Palestina 5 had achieved great success. Convoy leader Kevin Ovenden announced at a press conference before leaving the Gaza Strip that Viva Palestina plans to organize its sixth "aid" convoy to Gaza with the participation of more international institutions, as well as participate in future sea convoys to Gaza.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk