No legislation regarding
"unauthorized" communities in Judea and Samaria came to the floor of the Knesset
today.
Prime Minister Netanyahu requested
that the sponsors of these bills give him two weeks to work out the
situation in Ulpana without legislation. One can never be sure what
he'll pull out of his sleeve, but I advise my readers not to expect a miracle
solution from him.
Credit: Huffington
Post
While Likud MKs had been released
from coalition obligations, he had not given Likud ministers latitude to vote
their conscience -- they would have been expected to vote according to coalition
instructions. This in itself made a win unlikely. Ministers can buck
coalition discipline, but are liable for disciplinary action if they do.
And they'd be very unlikely to do so in light of the prime minister's
request. Which meant that pulling the legislation off the floor was a prudent
move.
First MK Zevulun Orlev (Habayit
Hayehudi) withdrew his proposed legislation.
Credit: Times of
Israel
Ya'akov -Ketzeleh- Katz
(Chair, National Union) withdrew with great reluctance and only at the last
minute.
Credit:
IsraelMatzav
~~~~~~~~~~
I've been told by a source inside
the Knesset that Netanyahu pledged that Defense Minister Barak would make no
move towards the demolition of the Ulpana houses until after the two
weeks.
Then I was told that there was a
"sort of" commitment from Netanyahu to release the ministers from coalition
discipline if he is unable to resolve the issue and the legislation is brought
to the floor. Can't say exactly what "sort of" means.
~~~~~~~~~~
For the record, I've been advised
that there are some real (if not overwhelming) differences between the two
versions of the legislation, with Katz's version more broadly applicable to a
variety of communities.
~~~~~~~~~~
I want to turn to the issue
of Iran. It is by far THE overriding issue. The number of statements
being made, and of words flowing from computer keyboards with regard to
what is going on is rather daunting.
In a nutshell: The world is being
"had."
Or is allowing itself to be "had,"
and there's a very good case to be made for this position. See "Talks aim
not to thwart Iran nukes, but to stop Israeli attack":
~~~~~~~~~~
Two things are going on.
Negotiations have begun again in
Baghdad. Just days ago the NY Times announced that the
representatives of the international community who are negotiating with Iran
(the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany) have said they
are prepared to offer "an incentives package" if Iran will agree to end
enrichment of uranium.
Incentives? That was
fast in coming.
Meanwhile IAEA chief Yukiya Amano
has been in Tehran for talks with Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Saeed
Jalili. On Monday they announced an agreement regarding
inspections of nuclear sites. But there is so very much wrong with all of
this. Amano announced before the meeting that he and Jalili had determined
that they would come to an agreement.
This being the case, we can
speculate with reasonable certainty that Amano didn't go in with
intentions of being tough. He did not declare, "You want an
agreement? THIS is what we demand." It was more like, "Oh, we've
already said we need that agreement, so let's see how we can arrange this."
Questions have been raised regarding the cleaning of key sites prior to any
inspections, and time limits that Iran wants placed on the IAEA's right to do
inspections.
You don't have to be a nuclear
scientist (forgive the awful pun) to see what's going on here.
The world is ever so hungry for
"success." Iran will accommodate to a point, to give the international
community the sense of having achieved something -- and then will run rings
around them all.
~~~~~~~~~~
In the face of all of this, I
remain relatively calm, for the simple reason that I know neither Israel's prime
minister nor defense minister is buying into all of this.
Monday night, Netanyahu said
(emphasis added):
"Iran wants to destroy Israel and
it is developing nuclear weapons to fulfill that goal. Leading world powers need
to display determination and not weakness in the face of this malicious
intention. They should not make any concessions to
Iran.
"They
need to make clear and unequivocal demands that Iran stop all of its
nuclear enrichment activity, remove all the material that has been enriched
until now and dismantle the underground nuclear facility near Qom. Only
then can we be sure Iran will not get an atomic bomb."
Netanyahu made it
clear that Israel's views on this matter "will not change."
~~~~~~~~~~
And today,
in an Israel Radio interview, Barak said (again, emphasis added):
"Obama and
the representatives of the West are not naive. But they want
to achieve progress, so they are willing to
compromise.
"Israel is
demanding a complete halt to Iranian uranium enrichment." Barak added that
the West was setting the bar too low and demanding too little. "We
mustn't blink, concede, or cave at the last minute."
As to Amano's
negotiations in Tehran, Barak observed:
"The Iranians
orchestrated things in such a way that when the Baghdad talks rolled around they
would be able to tell the world powers that they were already coordinating the
procedural details with the IAEA, and when Amano wanted to talk about the
essential issues they could say that they were working those out with the world
powers. It gives them a little wiggle room."
~~~~~~~~~~
Please,
understand this critical point, which is being made by Israeli officials in the
Prime Minister's Office, the Defense Ministry and the Foreign
Ministry:
The IAEA
agreement only relates to monitoring and is not enough to halt Iran's nuclear
progress.
As one senior
official was cited as saying (emphasis added), "The problem is [that]
Iran's program is continuing unabated and needs to be stopped. We have
seen what happened with agreements between the IAEA and Iran in the past. Terms
were agreed but facilities were still set up openly, like Natanz in 2002 and Qom
in 2009. The latest IAEA report reveals Iran's scams and
deceptions."
~~~~~~~~~~
Maj. Gen. Itai Baron, head of the
Military Intelligence research department, provided a briefing yesterday for the
Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee
What he said was
that Iran was moving ahead with its nuclear program — enriching
uranium and maintaining full operation of the facilities near Qom and
Bushehr. Iran has trebled its pace of uranium
enrichment to 20 percent. Baron estimates that by the end of
2012, Iran will have enriched sufficient uranium to 20% to build a
single nuclear device.
I've read elsewhere that beyond
this point it would take Iran somewhere between six and 18 months to
produce a bomb.
So, with so many people
patting themselves on the back with regard to "progress" in Iranian
negotiations, precisely who is paying attention to this critical
information?
~~~~~~~~~~
In closing, I leave you with this:
Barak has made it clear, once again, in the face of these "negotiations," that
Israel does not rule out any option. What this means is that if a deal is
struck with Iran, and Israeli leaders deem it insufficient, so that Iran remains
a danger to Israel and the world, we will act as we see
fit.
We'd stand alone, and so be
it. It would hardly be the first time.
~~~~~~~~~~
©
Arlene Kushner. This material is produced by Arlene Kushner,
functioning as an independent journalist. Permission is granted for it to be
reproduced only
with
proper attribution.
This material
is transmitted by Arlene only to persons who have requested it or agreed to
receive it. If you are on the list and wish to be removed, contact Arlene and
include your name in the text of the message.
No comments:
Post a Comment