Nancy Morgan
New revelations have come to light casting yet more doubt on the UN backed science data being used to buttress man-made global warming claims. The Russian media is reporting that the Hadley/CRU, whose e-mails were hacked last month, deliberately distorted the climate of 1/8 of the planet. [T]he Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.
The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory.
Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the country’s territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports.
Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations.
The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.
The London Telegraph’s James Dellingpole succinctly sums up the latest indication of the massive fraud and manipulation of data which appears to invalidate the claim of a global warming crisis,
“What the Russians are suggesting here, in other words, is that the entire global temperature record used by the IPCC to inform world government policy is a crock.”
Meanwhile, over in Copenhagen, the push to adopt a global redistribution of wealth based on what could be phony science, proceeds. Africa is demanding an immediate $10 billion bucks per annum for three years to alleviate the effects of this non-crisis and world leaders, including Gordon Brown and President Obama have agreed to a climate fund with an initial funding of $30 billion bucks. Just to “jump-start” the process.
The media in the United States, with a few exceptions, has yet to cover this Silent Scandal, which mirrors the treatment of this scandal by the world media. Earlier this month 56 papers in 45 countries published a joint editorial saying,
“Unless we combine to take decisive action, climate change will ravage our planet, and with it our prosperity and security. The dangers have been becoming apparent for a generation. Now the facts have started to speak”
Like the UN, the media has decided to redefine ‘facts’ to fit their ideological agenda, leading this author to the conclusion that media malfeasance has the potential to be a bigger threat to our planet than the unproven, unsettled science of a global warming crisis. And if you’ll be kind enough to give me $10 billion bucks, I’ll be able to prove it.
To date, Chris Horner, a senior fellow at Competitive Enterprise Institute, and the blog Wall Street Pit are the only media in the United States that have reported on this latest outrage. The rest of our media are deliberately ignoring all ClimateGate stories, in hopes that our representatives currently attending the Copenhagen Climate Conference will be able to “jump-start” the process and get global climate policies enacted before anyone catches on that the emperor has no clothes. Hey, it just might work.
No comments:
Post a Comment