Doc's Talk: Open letter to Charles Krauthammer , Glen Beck and Bill Kristol

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Open letter to Charles Krauthammer , Glen Beck and Bill Kristol

To: Fox News management

To: Mr. Charles Krauthammer, Glen Beck and William (Bill) Kristol

Dear Mr. Krauthammer, Mr. Beck and Mr. Kristol's and their platform Fox Network,

I usually agree with and highly respect Mr. Krauthammer, Mr. Beck and Mr. Kristol's views on most matters but on the Islam issue you are all DEAD WRONG.

However, your attack on the Kafir-infidel Geert Wilders is of no surprise to me when you have to publically please and appease the Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who is Fox News' major stock holder.

After all Talal's money invested in Fox network is Saudi money and Saudi Arabia is the world's leading Wahhabism center. Price Tatal is a Wahhab, a name given to Moslem people who strictly follow the Moslem Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab's philosophy . Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab philosophy advocates to violently purify Islam from what he considered innovations in Islam, its name in Arabic is Bidah. He believed that those who practice innovation in Islam are Kafir or an infidel. The word Kafir comes from the Arabic noun Takfeer, declaring that a person is Kafir. Such declaration by the Wahhabis has many potential consequences which could include execution. Because the Saudis possess the ultimate right to declare people Kuffar, the plural of Kafir or infidels, Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab's followers led an army which occupied Ta’if and Mecca. This was followed by massacres of unarmed Muslims, including men, women, and children, and the destruction of many graves and holy sites. Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab also considered destroying the house where the Prophet Muhammad was born and out of fear that it might be worshipped he destroyed shrines and sacred tombs in Mecca and Medina, including the grave of the Prophet Muhammad and his companions.

I, and I am sure many just like me, hold a view contrary to yours, that Islamism and moderate Islam are one of the same; there is no difference. While many Muslims do not commit violence, the vast majority of Moslems would sympathize with the Islamic terrorists' goals and their Jihad. Publically many Muslims may condemn terror, however, when speaking in their mother's tongue Arabic they sing a different tune. Best comparison is Mahmoud Abbas-Abu Mazen and the Arabstinians. They speak with forked tongue: they tell the world they wish for peace with Israel and in Arabic they teach even their toddlers to hate and kill Jews.

To appease Islam Geert Wilders is an easy target. It is easy to label Mr. Wilders - who has a Judeo Christian background - a "demagogue", as Bill Kristol did or "fascist" as Glen Beck did. No one in the free and sane world will call for punishment Fatwa on you. However, it is not that easy to bash a Moslem, using similar debasing terms, when the basher is an infidel, a person of another faith or a former Muslim, whether secular or totally agnostic.

Criticizing Mr. Wilders so wrongly is simply political correctness, the appeasement and lying disease you have all caught and now suffer from. He is 101% correct about Islam. It would be difficult for political commentators such as you to refute Mr. Wilders claim about Islam while maintaining any credibility. But this you can only do off the air because if you criticize Islam on the air, you will find yourself off the Fox News air forever. Apparently stating the truth about Islam is not worth losing your job for even though you may gain overwhelming credibility in the public opinion; so you lie.

Politically correctness kills. Though the Obama administration has hushed the incident as much as it possibly could and the media wrapped it with endless political correctness articles, only recently, in Fort Hood military base the political correctness disease, now blindly and frivolously covering for Islam, killed thirteen innocent military personnel and wounded many others.

The politically correct view we got from everyone on the panel is dangerous to America and more dangerous than any healthcare bill that would ever pass; it is dangerous to the entire world!

I strongly suggest, but I will not hold my breath to hear a different tune from you after watching it, you watch Sean Hannity's last week interview with Mosab Hassan Yousef, who converted from Islam to Christianity and is the author of the book "the Son of Hamas" and is the son of Sheikh Hassan Yousef the founder of terrorist group Hamas and the Moslem Brotherhood in the "West Bank": http://www.shoebat.com/videos/sonHamas.php and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rafNrSslYUc. This courageous young man who renounced Islam went public to confirms each statement Mr. Wilders makes about Islam and its danger to our free world. Mosab Yousef life is now threatened; Al Qaeda issued a statement: "Whoever changes his religion-kill him," yet he saw it his duty to tell the truth, to warn us about Islam, the truth you are burying. How dare you challenge or refute the claims Mr. Wilders makes about Islam when ex-Moslems totally agree with him? Who knows better?!

In his interview Mosab Yousef dispels the myth about "moderate" Moslems and "moderate" Islam, which is the Western, mostly Leftist media and cowardice "Globalists" invention." He states that "moderate" Moslem does not exist. At the end of the day all Moslems are the same; they all believe in the God of the Quran and that Quran is written, word by word, from that God (Allah) and all Moslems believe in Jihad, which is their God's Word written in the Quran. Mosab Yousef claims that Moslems have morality, responsibility and logic more than their God. The most criminal Moslem terrorist has morality and minimum humanity more than his God and their [the Moslems and terrorist Moslems] God is a terrorist and ignorant. And you dare to state that Mr. Wilders is a fascist and a demagogue when an ex Moslem states that if Moslems allow themselves to listen to this Quran and at the same time believe it is from God, they are [Moslems] sick and they need help! Mr. Wilders is right, you are not!

If you study Islam's 1400 year history, it was always spread by the sword. From 1920, the fall of the Moslem Ottoman Empire and until about 1979, with the fall of the Shah of Iran, we witnessed some sort of Islamic non-violent period. However, this peaceful time is over and Islam is back to its own self. We are now witnessing the new rise of violent Islam, which is also clearly described in the Bible. Islam's ideology is evidence in itself; it is based on the Quran and the writings of all recognized Islamic scholars and their religious jurisprudence, all prove that Islam is not a peaceful religion and Muslims who are peaceful are that way despite the religion and not because of it.

When the Nazis took over Germany they were initially a small minority but it did not stop them from taking over Germany and advancing in their goal to conquer the world ONLY because good people were silent, did little, or did nothing. We are not allowed to repeat this practice and Geert Wilders speaks volume for the good people who will not remain silent.

Nazism and Islam go hand in hand. In his book, ‘The Second World War’, a master piece, for which, he received the Nobel Prize in Literature, Winston Churchill called Adolf Hitler’s book ‘Mein Kampf’ “the new Quran of faith and war, turgid, verbose, shapeless, bur pregnant with its message”. Churchill’s clear comparison of the Quran and ‘Mein Kampf’ is absolutely spot on. The core of the Quran is the call to jihad. Jihad in Arabic is a call for battle. Kampf is German is for battle. Jihad and kampf mean exactly the same. Islam and Nazism mean exactly the same.

No matter how you prefer to call it, describe it, apologize for it, burry the truth about it under your political correctness practice, Islam now present a major problem to the free world, which is mostly the West and all democracies. More so, it is a threat to the Judeo-Christian civilization. Islam is represented by 1.2 billion Moslems which is about 22% of the world's population; it may still be a dangerous minority in Europe, the USA, Australia, New Zealand and other free societies, but like Nazism it can still take over the majority and rule by the sword. If the Islamists take control, the peaceful-moderate Moslems would be subjugated in a way not dissimilar to what happened in Germany before WWII.

Be assured that every single mosque the USA preaches the hatred of infidels Americans, Jews and Israel. The American public is constantly being deceived by its media, commentators like you and their leaders; if we do not end the political correctness practice now it will, no doubt, kill millions of us!; 9/11 will look like a trail run! Ask Zak Izzat a former Muslim born in Detroit, USA and he will confirm this.

Also be assured that all Islamic organizations in America act as front groups for Islamic terrorists and their objective is to subjugate us all under their Sharia law.

Please stop the political correctness and I will rest my case. If you do not wish to speak the truth on Islam, please don't degrade yourself to the level of apologizing for it. Please don't practice the Moslems' sacralized lying, Taqiyya, they use in order to further the interests of the ummah or the Islamic community of believers. Rather say nothing than deliberately appear so ridiculously dim-witted.

Mr. Geert Wilder is not a bigot, a fascist or a demagogue; he is a courageous man, a true champion of freedom, fearless, true and right on. With the assistance of people like you, they Moslems will be successful; they will not only silence us all, including you, who have the right to freedom of speech but will also kill us too, starting with you Mr. Krauthammer and Mr. Kristol, because you are Jews, the Saturday people, and then you Mr. Beck, the Sunday people.

I ask you to voice the truth and stop assisting the Islamic cause on account of all free people.

Respectfully yours,

Nurit Greenger

USA

1 comment:

Alexander Maccabee said...: If one allows Islam to ruin the world, why bother with all the lessor issues Mr. Beck et al concern themselves with.; 7:51 AM

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk