Doc's Talk: Resetting Israel

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Resetting Israel

Nurit Greenger

In 1948, the key to their ancient homeland was returned to the Jewish Nation, which, at that point, was scattered all over the world. The Jews, whom the Roman Empire expelled from their homeland in Judea and Jerusalem, could finally return to their home from which they were kept away for over 2000 years. This international effort brought the about the case of finally ending, forever, the Jewish victimhood Diaspora mentality. Yet, to a large extent, Jews cannot shake off this mentality. Even Israelis, the privileged citizens of the only sovereign Jewish state in the entire world, still act along a victimhood mentality, this time being the useful idiots victims of the Israeli Left Wing Elite. The Israeli Liberal-Leftist Elite group toxicity is ruing Israel's fiber and is systematically diminishing its possibility to endure and survive.

The time has come to vigorously confront the Israeli Left Wing Elite and its agenda and get the flock that is listening to them, even agreeing with them and their cohorts abroad, to abscond them and join the "other" camp; the Zionist, nationalist and patriotic Israeli camp!

Since the 1967 Six Day War, it is clear that Israelis have been suffering from a progressing failure of collective memory. So so many Jews living outside Israel. They keep on forgetting what are the multiple reasons that have brought Israel to its current position of isolation and forever being attacked, hardly with any justifications, by the international community.

Along with blaming Israel for all of the Arabs' problem s, many accuse Israelis of being racists. However, the real definition of racism is 'Expecting a Jew to die willingly at the expense of the Arabs, aka 'Palestinians', inconvenience." This is true RACISM! Have Jews forgotten this key element already!? Expecting a Jew to give up the right to self defense is Racism! Remember, for over 2,000 years Jews lost this right, now revived, and must be protected by all means.

One huge failure is that the Israeli Left Elite has bought into the Arabs, aka "Palestinians" narrative. They have bought into the GIANT hoax of all, the "Palestinian" nationalism.

Once the Arabs realized that war will not bring Israel to its knees and will not end its existence, the Arabs resorted to a very successful public relations war Israel lost to them years ago. This war is fought with a deceptive narrative that consists of a none existing "Palestinian" nationalism and distorted history that claims the land belongs to them. The true narrative of the Arabs is not to establish a state, rather to dismantle other states. To dismantle the State of Israel. "Palestine" is simply a hypothetical fiction, and the "Palestinian" nation, is an Arab colonial invention.

This narrative must be eliminated. To rebuttal this narrative until it is no more, Israelis, with the help of all their supporters, Jews and non-Jews, must delegitimize the "Palestinians" narrative. Meaning, delegitimizing and depoliticizing the "Palestinian" state from the international agenda.

In the late 1980's Israel's leadership took the first leap of faith step towards possible peace with the Arab without studying and taking into account all the long terms political repercussions the "peace" idea carried. We then first heard the two states for two people, the two state solution idea. This idea took on so many versions, it is now only a meaningless word, mostly used in ill intend rhetoric. BUT, if it comes to par, it is the greatest threat to Israel existence. In fact, Israel will not survive if an Arab state is established in Judea and Samaria!

From a topographic , demographic and security reason, add to it Jewish history and heritage, there cannot be an Arab state in Judea and Samaria. Israelis and the pro-Israel camp must know this and act accordingly.

If the two state [de]solution - delusion becomes reality after all, and the Arabs will be given a state in Judea and Samaria, one might as well look upon the entire State of Israel as one large, high security jail yard and the new Arab state, nestled in the Judea and Samaria hills, as he Jail yard guard towers. This Arab state, many already call "Palestine" will be watching every move the Israeli inmates in the State of Israel yard make. One wrong move, one bad hair day for the guards at the towers, and the guards will be shooting at the Jewish inmates, mowing then down. Agreeing to make Judea and Samaria an Arab state is every Israeli simply giving up the rights to self defense.

One other issue to deal with immediately, is the United Nations Organization that has been horrendous perpetrator of the human problems in the Middle East. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, acronym UNRWA, was established following the 1948 Arab-Israel War, Israel War of Independence. Its only frame of work is to take care of the Arabs, known as "Palestinians" refugees, humanitarian needs but not to merge them into a normal society in which they will be required to be productive members. In the past sixty years UNRWA, with enormous financial backing, has created an Arabic society that lives on the dole. It is, however, the life line of the "Palestinian" refugees and it has had nothing but an approved record of failure. The other UN organization body that helps all other world refugees, is the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, acronym UNHCR. It was established in December 14, 1950 an has an approved record of success. Ending the life of UNRWA will be the beginning or ending the "Palestinian" refugee problem that had been deliberately perpetuated by UNRWA, with the support of the Arab nations and the endless financial backing of the USA and the Europeans.

Once UNRWA will lose its funding, it will simply implode into UNHCR. The world must then demand that the Arab nations end discriminating the Arabs, calling themselves "Palestinians." The world must demand these Arabs are treated by their brethren as they demand of Israel to treat them, with dignity and respect and give them all the human rights they deserve.

The "Palestinians" are the Public Relations Division of the Arabs.

It is not "Peace Now"; it is peace eventually and there are conditions attached to it that must guarantee that the State of Israel survives and thrives. Until then we, the pro-Israel - Jews and non-Jews - camp, collectively, must become the Public Relations Division of the Jewish State of Israel.

Comprehensive solution to the two state [de]solution can only be achieved by the Jewish Nation political determination in its ancient Jewish State. The point of departure: Israel is the home of the Jews. Only when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable it is, it must be the truth on which one must act. To this point, Israelis and Jews have failed the test of history.

We enjoyed the days when Israelis and their leaders had the kind of chutzpa no one had; they were feisty and stood their ground to preserve each square millimeter of their land. We eagerly want to see this type of behavior from Israelis and Israel's leadership rise again and takes control of the country's future.

Total resetting of Israel is the first step to a brighter future.

Rise And Rise Again Until Lambs Become Lions!

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk