Rachel Hirshfeld
In October 2010,
the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights broadened its
interpretation of Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. In
addition to prohibiting discrimination based on race, national origin or
color in federally funded programs, the provision added protection
against “harassment of members of religious groups based on shared
ethnic characteristics,” which in practical terms includes Jews.
However, this expansion has led to a heated debate within the
Jewish community, which will be further discussed at the Jewish Council
for Public Affairs (JCPA) summit in Detroit, regarding whether Jews
should use this right to initiate federal suits against anti-Semitic and
anti-Israel activity on campus or whether they should have to meet
higher standards than other groups when issuing a claim.
The Zionist Organization of American, which spearheaded efforts to
broaden the definitions of Title VI, asserts that anti-Israel activities
on campus quickly become incidents of anti-Semitic harassment. Other
groups, however, claims that events, while perharps distatful, in no way
amount to a breach of the civil rights of Jewish students on campus.“We believe it is the
spines of those who claim to represent American Jews that must be
stiffened, and not the pre-requisite standards allowing Jews use of
Title VI,” said Lori Lowenthal Marcus, executive committee chair of the
National Conference on Jewish Affairs (NCJA).
“To suggest, as the JCPA has done, that Jews are more likely than
other groups to assert frivolous Title VI claims, or that the aura of
First Amendment or academic freedom impedes Jews, and only Jews, from
seeking redress, is a double-standard which can only harm Jewish
students,” said Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, who chairs the NCJA Task Force
on Academia and Campus Life, and who co-authored NCJA’s Statement on
Campus Anti-Semitism and Title VI.
In June 2009 Rossman-Benjamin, a lecturer at University of
California Santa Cruz, filed a Title VI complaint against her
university, claiming that some faculty and administrators had abused
their positions and university resources in order to promote hatred of
the Jewish state and its supporters, which in turn had created an
intellectually and emotionally hostile environment for Jewish students.
According to Rossman-Benjamin, “it is irresponsible for the leaders of
major Jewish organizations to promote a stricter standard for Jews to
meet than for non-Jews in order to seek redress under Title VI.”
No comments:
Post a Comment