Sultan Knish
"War is peace," entered our cultural vocabulary some sixty-four years
ago. Around the same time that Orwell's masterpiece was being printed
up, an armistice was being negotiated between Israel and the Arab
invading armies. That armistice began the long peaceful war or the
warring peace.
The
entire charade did not properly enter the realm of the Orwellian until
the peace process began. The peace process between Israel and the
terrorist militias funded by the countries of those invading armies has
gone on for longer than most actual wars. It has also taken more lives
than most actual wars.
War has an endpoint. Peace does not. A
peace in which you are constantly at war can go on forever because while
the enthusiasts of war eventually exhaust their patriotism, the
enthusiasts of peace never give up on their peacemaking.
Warmongers may stop after a few thousand dead, but Peacemongers will pirouette over a million corpses.
Two
decades later the peace process has failed in every way imaginable and
cemeteries on both sides are full of the casualties of peace. Two
decades which have created two abortive Palestinian states at war with
one another and with Israel.
Two decades later, it's still time for peace.
Peace
time means that it’s time to ring up some more Israeli concessions in
the hopes of getting the terrorists and their quarreling states back to
the negotiating table for another photo op in the glorious album of
peacemakers.
And if the photos are properly posed, perhaps there will even be another Nobel Peace Prize in it for all the participants.
It
would be nice to think that the peace disease was one of those viruses
carried only in the bloodstream of liberals. But it's not.
Every
so often I am asked about a solution to the
Israeli-Palestinian-Arab-Muslim conflict and the interrogators are
baffled when I tell them that there is no solution.
"No solution
at all? But there has to be a solution. What of all the moderate voices
of goodwill? What of all the mothers who only want to raise their
children to sing happy songs about peace? What about all the old
soldiers who are tired of war? What if we get them all in a room to
shake hands and pose for photos? Then won't there be peace?"
As
society has become more progressive, it has become progressively more
difficult to explain even even to intelligent people that the world
simply does not work that way.
For two Cold War generations it
was nearly impossible to communicate that there really would be no peace
with the Soviet Union other than the cold kind maintained by a mutual
balance of power. Their children and grand-children appear equally
unequipped to understand that most serious wars end with either one side
definitively losing and fundamentally changing as a result of that
defeat or both sides maintaining a cold peace that will last only as
long as neither side believes that it can squash the other with a
surprise attack.
Israel did have peace until it began peace
negotiations. It wasn't a perfect peace, but aside from the minor
problems of the Intifada, a comparative pinprick set against the
violence that began after that infamous Rose Garden handshake, it was a
good time whose like was then not seen again until Israel stopped
playing peace process with the terrorists and learned to keep them away
instead.
But the relative absence of violence, according to the
amateur peacemakers, isn't peace. A wartime peace isn't what they want.
What they want is a peacetime war. Let there be handshakes and suicide
bombings. Let there be bloody bodies scraped off the sidewalk, but let
there also be children's choirs singing about peace. Let a thousand
tombstones rise, so long as everyone can believe that peace is at hand.
This
vulgar worship of peace as a religion, a creed that restores the faith
of faithless men and women in humanity is a combination of empty
sentimentality and calculated ignorance.
We
must have peace in our time, the peacemakers say. And Israel must
provide it. More territorial concessions must be put on the table. More
goodwill must be shown so that the peacemakers can stare at their
televisions and sigh, their faith in the goodness of every man, woman,
child and suicide bomber restored once again.
Who will Israel
make peace with? President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, who
hasn't run for office since Hamas won the elections, doesn't want to
negotiate. Hamas only wants to negotiate a short-term pause in its
campaign to destroy Israel. When he isn't warring with Hamas, Abbas is
declaring that he shares the same view on terrorism as Hamas. Now that
Abbas is back together with Hamas, there isn't even anyone to negotiate
with.
But peacemakers aren't interested in details. They like
their mindless idealism big picture. And the big picture is that there
must be an answer. Tens of thousands demanded it in London before the
war and Chamberlain delivered it to them. Peace arrived in our time,
shortly before the Nazi bombers. Thousands more demanded it of every
American president who faced a Communist thug across a negotiating
table. And they got it.
There were nuclear treaties that meant
nothing to the Soviets and that did not bring peace, but that made all
the amateur peacemakers feel better about themselves. And then instead
of peace coming across a negotiating table, the Soviet Union collapsed
because a persnickety cowboy wouldn't give up a missile defense program
that every Harvard graduate knew could never work. And now, as another
Harvard graduate proudly tries to take credit for Israel's Iron Dome,
they still know it can't work.
Reagan didn't end the Cold War
with treaties; he ended it by doggedly pursuing superior firepower. And
that is why in the name of peace, the Harvard grad looking over Iron
Dome on his visit to Israel, has shown Russia his peaceful flexibility
by abandoning the final stage of missile defense. Every Harvard grad
knows that missile defense doesn't bring peace.
But what could
anyone expect from Reagan? The poor dummy went to Eureka College. How
could he know that defeating the USSR wouldn't work?
Obama wants
the same thing from Israel that he's trying to get by selling out Poland
on missile defense. Peace. While the only times Israel has had any
measure of peace is in the aftermath of a war.
Harvard grads and
the people who listen to them know that peace only comes about at the
tail end of a long string of concessions and appeasement. And then when
you have finally given your tormentor your house keys, your car keys and
your lucky 2-dollar-bill, then having rifled through your empty
pockets, he will finally nod grudgingly and agree to peace at last.
That is if he doesn't actually want to kill you.
And that is the trouble with peacemakers; they don't really take into account how to make peace with killers.
Most
countries lock up violent murderers when they kill a dozen people for
fun. But when they kill a dozen people in order to liberate other
killers or lay claim to a piece of land, then they are worth negotiating
with.
And the only outcome of the negotiations is establishing murder as a negotiating tactic.
Peace
leads to war because peacemaking rewards the warmakers. It rewards the
obstinate killers who refuse to stop killing. And the more it rewards
them, the more they kill.
That is why Israel has been decades
late in delivering the peace that all the amateur peacemakers want.
Every time it phones Terrorism Inc. to place an order for peace with
extra brotherhood on top, a suicide bomber pulls up to its front door.
And so for two decades, in a pesky reality of peacemaking that none of
the peacemakers care to hear about... peace has meant war.
Every
time a new phase of the endless peace process is launched, more people
die. More people die during the negotiations than otherwise. The
peacemakers explain this by saying that the terrorists who aren't at the
negotiating table are trying to sabotage the terrorists who are at the
negotiating table. The dead are sacrifices for peace and if Israel
fights back against either group of terrorists, then it is guilty of
obstructing the peace process which aside from all the terrorism was
going really well.
The
rational response is that peace simply isn't going to happen. The two
terrorist groups in their two states were set up for the sole purpose of
destroying Israel. They are funded and supported by those countries
that were attacking Israeli farmsteads with tanks around the time that
Orwell was putting his final touches on "War is Peace, Slavery is
Freedom and Ignorance is Strength."
They are not going to stop
trying to destroy Israel because it's all they know and it's their only
reason for existence. And if that weren't enough, they have spent
generations teaching their children to hate and there is no sign
whatsoever of them putting the brakes on the hate machine which
expresses more clearly than anything else that they do not intend to
stop fighting now or even twenty years from now.
Not when their educational system is busy training the suicide bomber of tomorrow.
But
ignorance is a particular strength of peacemakers. They don't want
reasons why it can't happen. Nor do they want to hear that the best kind
of peace with people whose religion tells them that they will go to
heaven if they die while cutting your throat is the heavily armed peace
of cold iron and steel.
War is their peace and ignorance is their strength.
No comments:
Post a Comment