Sultan Knish
Revolutions are not unique. Some countries have revolutions all the time
until revolution becomes their national sport. In banana republics the
overthrow of one dictator to make way for another gives everyone a day
off from work.
These
revolutions, no matter how they are cloaked in the familiar rhetoric of
liberty, are nothing more than tyranny by other means.
What made
the American Revolution unique was that its cause was not the mere
transfer of power from one ruler to another or one system to another,
but a fundamental transformation of the nature of rule.
Every revolution claims to be carried out in the name of the people, but it's never the people who end up running things.
The
Declaration of Independence did more than talk about the rights of the
people. It placed the people at the center of the nation and its
government, not as an undifferentiated mass to be harnessed for whatever
propaganda purposes they might be good for, but as individuals with
hopes and dreams.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed."
That is not merely some bland reference to a mass of
people. There is no collective here, only the individual. The greater
good of independence is not some system that will meet with the approval
of the mass, but that will make it possible for the individual, each
individual, to live a free life, not a life lived purely for the good of
the mass, but for his own sake.
In a time when government
mandates what you can eat and how much of it, only one of the ways it
seeks to regulate every aspect of daily life for the greater good-- the
declaration that started it all declares that the purpose of government
is not social justice, a minimally obese population, universal tolerance
or even equality. Equality is acknowledged as a fact, not as a goal.
Instead the goal of government is to allow people to be happy.
That
seems like a silly goal. What kind of great nation gets started by
asserting that government exists to allow people to be happy? But look
at the common condition of any tyranny. Take in that sense of 1984ness
and its most obvious characteristic is unhappiness. People are
persistently unhappy under a tyranny, whether they are rich or poor,
because they are robbed of the necessary freedom to pursue individual
happiness.
They are not allowed to be individuals.
We live
in an age of collective tyrannies under systems that seek to maximize
the ideal welfare of the group. They care nothing for the happiness of
the individual. And they care even less for the notion that the
individual has a right to achieve that happiness by pursuing it on its
own terms, rather than through their socially-approved and market-tested
form of happiness.
The Declaration of Independence lays out the
conundrum that governments exist to allow individuals to pursue their
own forms of happiness.
A government that makes it possible for
individuals to do that cannot be a tyranny. And conversely a government
that makes it impossible is a tyranny.
Modern revolutions are
solution-based. So are modern governments. Redistribute the wealth.
Power to the workers. Put X in charge. Strengthen Laws Y through Z.
Impose your will on everyone else. And there is the Declaration of
Independence, old and worn, offering up an idea as fragile as a
butterfly, that government does not exist to impose solutions, but to
protect the individual's pursuit of happiness.
What
is it that threatens the individual pursuit of happiness? Government.
The proper government that the Declaration of Independence gives weight
to is one that protects the people from government; other governments as
well as their own. It protects from them from being regarded as a mass,
a great porridge of people to be poured into the proper molds. It
protects them from being an undifferentiated mass reduced to a
mathematical average of allotted happiness based on the latest trends in
sociological happiness research.
It protects their individuality.
The
pursuit of happiness is not necessarily wise. It is often foolish. One
man finds happiness in overeating and yet he lives in a society where
his pursuit of gorging on giant sodas and salty snacks is protected from
all the fidgeting experts eager to rush in and begin prodding him into
good health. Another man finds happiness in inventing airplanes and is
free to attempt flight despite all the bearded men and women wearing
fake Indian jewelery and smelling of patchouli who want him to write up
an environmental impact statement.
Happiness is individual and
individuals are eccentric. Their pursuits of happiness will lead to both
good and bad. Individuality is the ultimate diversity and there is no
substitute for it if you want a society that breaks through barriers,
rather than wrestling in the streets over the fortieth revolution that
will finally convince everyone that the right way to live is under
Osceopeology. (It won't.)
The Declaration of Independence was
not only a national statement, but an individual statement as well. It
envisioned a government fit for individuals, rather than massive masses.
A government that would free individuals to pursue their own goods,
rather than enslaving them to the greater good that is intellectually
fashionable at any given moment.
And that is what makes it more
relevant than ever. The Redcoats are not about to march into Boston, but
the Regulators are. The rising power of government has transformed its
laws and systems into a means for the elites to impose their will on the
whole country, to stamp out their private pursuits of happiness for
collective ends.
The nanny state, like every good nanny, is
suspicious of private and unsupervised pursuits of happiness. It accepts
equality not as a fact, but as a goal, whose achievement requires the
absolute and total regulation of all private matters and activities. It
has no truck with liberty because it understands, rightly, that liberty
imposes limitations on its powers of control.
The Fourth is not
only a celebration of nationhood, but of a nation of individuals. It is
as much a celebration of private freedoms as of public ones. It is a
celebration of a nation of individuals capable of voluntarily pursuing
their happiness by securing a nation, rather than a nation of slaves
waiting to be given their marching orders by another government agency.
An
inalienable right can be restricted or taken away, but it never
disappears. It never goes away because its origin source in a Divine
Power transcends governments and ideologies. It is not bound by the
fashions of the day. It is a permanent and absolute statement that the
dignity of the individual is not distributed with a soup ladle in the
shelter of the state, but comes from the individual.
It is not the people that need governments. It is governments that need people.
As
we celebrate the Fourth in an America where the pursuit of individual
happiness has been forgotten and repressed, mark the occasion by
exercising your right to the pursuit of your happiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment