Monday, January 25, 2010

Obama asks War? What war?

Charles Krauthammer

Janet Napolitano — former Arizona governor, now over-matched secretary of homeland security will forever be remembered for having said of the attempt to bring down an airliner over Detroit: “The system worked.” The attacker’s concerned father had warned US authorities about his son’s jihadist tendencies. The would-be bomber paid cash and checked no luggage on a transoceanic flight He was nonetheless allowed to fly, and would have killed 288 people in the air alone, save for a faulty detonator and quick actions by a few passengers. Heck of a job, Brownie.
The reason the country is uneasy about the Obama administration’s response to this attack is a distinct sense of not just incompetence but incomprehension. From the very beginning, President Obama has relentlessly tried to downplay and deny the nature of the terrorist threat we continue to face. And, just to make sure even the dimmest understand, Mt Obama banishes the term “war on terror.” It’s over, that is, if it ever existed.

Mt Obama may have declared the war over. Unfortunately, A1-Qaeda has not, giving new meaning to the term “asymmetric warfare.” Linguistic and logical oddities littered Mr. Obama’s public pronouncements following the Christmas Day attack. In his first statement, Mr. Obama referred to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as “an isolated extremist.” This is the same president who, after the Fort Hood shooting, warned us “against jumping to conclusions” — code for daring to associate Nidal Hasan’s mass murder with his Islamist ideology Yet, with Abdulmutallab, Mr. Obama jumped immediately to the conclusion, against all existing evidence, that the bomber acted alone.

More jarring still were Mr. Obama’s references to the terrorist as a ‘suspect” who “allegedly tried to ignite an explosive device.” You can hear the echo of FDR: “Yesterday, Dec. 7, 1941 a date which will live in infamy — Japanese naval and air force suspects allegedly bombed Pearl Harbor.”

Mr. Obama reassured the nation that this “suspect” had been charged. Reassurance? The president should be saying: We have captured an enemy combatant — an illegal combatant under the laws of war: no uniform, direct attack on civilians and now to prevent future attacks, he is being interrogated regarding information he may have about Al-Qaeda in Yemen. Instead, is dispatched to a Detroit area jail and immediately lawyered up. At which point — surprise! He stops talking.

This absurdity renders hollow Mr. Obama’s declaration that “we will not rest until we find all who were involved.” Once we’ve given Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, we have gratuitously forfeited our right to find out from him precisely who else was involved, namely those who trained, instructed, armed and sent him.

The logic is perverse. If we find Abdulmutallab in an Al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen, where he is merely preparing for a terror attack, we snuff him out with a Predator — no judge, no jury no qualms. But, if we catch him in the United States in the very act of mass murder, he instantly acquires protection not just from execution by drone but even from interrogation.

The president said that this incident highlights “the nature of those who threaten our homeland.” But, the president is constantly denying the nature of those who threaten our homeland. On Tuesday, he referred five times to Abdulmutallab (and his terrorist ilk) as “extremist.”

A man who shoots abortion doctors is an extremist. An eco-fanatic who torches logging sites is an extremist. Abdulmutallab is, in fact, a jihadist. Jihadists have cells all over the world; they blow up trains in London, nightclubs in Bali and airplanes over Detroit (if they can); and are openly pledged to war on America.

Any government can through laxity let someone slip through the cracks. But, a government that refuses to admit that we are at war, indeed, refuses even to name the enemy — jihadist is a word banished from the Obama lexicon — turns laxity into a governing philosophy.

Charles Krauthammer’s e-mail address is

No comments: