Thursday, November 15, 2007

Israel should say to US, Bring it on?

Ted Belman

It is obvious that the Arabs by refusing to recognize Israel as a
Jewish state in addition to everything else they are refusing, dont
want peace, but surrender. The US for its part has removed the gloves and are down to bare
knuckles or should I say brass knuckles, at least when it comes to
Israel. Rice has made it clear that Israel must march to the US
drummer or else. She is now demanding that that Israel make it clear
that it will be withdrawing from Judea and Samaria by enforcing the
settlement freeze and dismantling the illegal outposts built since
2001.

Her ostensible authority for demanding this is Israels acceptance of
the Roadmap. Need I point out that the Roadmap arrived stillborn and
that the Arabs have never complied. In addition, Israels acceptance
was subject to Fourteen Reservations

. So one doesnt have to be a lawyer to understand that Israel isnt
bound by it.

So the time is fast approaching for a dustup. The US used to argue
that the Roadmap is about process. Now it is arguing that it is no
longer about process but about the goal. Nothing, not even process,
will stand in the way of the creation of a Palestinian state.

A settlement as envisioned by the US will impact Israel in very
significant ways,

1. Economically. It will cost Israel about $90 billion just for
relocation.

2. Security. It will greatly endanger Israel causing a vast increase
in the Defense Budget

3. Socially. Israel society will be further divided to the breaking
point. Also the lives of 200,000 citizens will be seriously disrupted
as witnessed by the Gush Katif expellees.

4. Ideologically. It will bring the end of Zionism and will gut
Judaism.

Israel as a Jewish state will not survive.

Allow me to speculate what will happen if Israel just says no.

The US could divorce itself from Israel totally but the American
people would not let this happen.

The US could withhold military grants of about $3 billion a year.
This also is unlikely to happen as giving Israel these credits
justifies selling arms to the Arabs. The millitary/industrial complex
in the US would strenuously object. Even if it did happen, Israel
could develop its own industry without restraint and would find much
cheaper good elsewhere. Israels exports would boom.

Economically Israel would be much better off doing without the US
arms grants than disengaging and incurring $90 billion in expenses.
Even with a US Guarantee of any borrowings necessary, it would cost
Israel far more to disengage than to say no and loose the grants.

Disengagement in Gaza and Lebanon has cost Israel dearly in human and
economic terms. Her defense budgets have greatly increased and many
more lives were lost as a result of disengagement than occupation. It
is cheaper and provides more security for Israel to stay in Judea and
Samaria.

The US would then start a debate on whether the US should pressure
Israel or go along with it. No such debate has yet to take place
because both parties support peace and the two-state solution. This
debate is long overdue. It is a debate that supporters of Israel will
win.

Similarly, in Israel, rejection of Oslo will be debated in earnest.
The rejectionists there will also win.

Bring it on.

No comments: