Doc's Talk: Obama and Abbas-Abu-Mazen, Buzz Off!-correction

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Obama and Abbas-Abu-Mazen, Buzz Off!-correction

Nurit Greenger

May 29, 2009

The narcissism, elitism and arrogance of this administration towards Israel is incomprehensible, unacceptable and must be stopped. Obama is diligently working with and for the Arabs with no clue of right from wrong, reality or myth; like the Arabs, Obama thinks that Israel is the culprit—Leftists always blame the evil on the victim—and she must give, give, give, and the Arabs who want and want must be given, given and given all they want. This is the picture Israel is facing:
Obama and Clinton, tutored by their own chosen ignorance, denial of truth and bizarre acceptance of the Arabs lies along with Obama’s Islamist trends and his zealous desire to appease the Muslims are pointing political spears and daggers at Israel.

“Natural Growth”: Obama and Clinton decided that Jews are not entitled to live comfortably or have large families that can all live in the same village or town. If Israeli families, who settled in Judea and Samaria, expanded over the past forty years from a father, a mother and three children, to become approximately sixty family members, in Obama and Clinton’s mind they are forbidden of adding more rooms in their homes, so each family member can lives comfortably, or build more homes to accommodate their entire clan—this is called natural growth. Israel needs to ask Obama if he will be permitted to demand and apply such policy in the USA. Will Obama tell Israel next how many children each Israeli family is allowed to have?

Israel cannot and must not cave into this most offensive and disparaging demand of the USA administration to stop all building homes for Jews in Judea and Samaria that are needed due to the “natural growth” of each family! This may be called anti-Semitism of some sort

Obama wants to see full halt to settlements—not some settlements, not outposts, not natural growth exceptions: Settlements—shmettlements; all existing settlements in Judea and Samaria that have been in existence for more than five years must remain and flourish. If, in the near of far future, Israel and the Arabs can arrive at some agreement that will not undo Israel’s right to secured borders, the Israelis and the Arabs can then negotiate what land the Arabs will live on and what land the Jews will live on. Right now, Samaria and Judea is the Land of Israel and Jews are allowed to live on each inch-centimeter of this land.

The PA, with full support from Obama are adamant that they will not negotiate with Israel unless Israel meets the ‘halt all settlements’ demand: When was the last time the PA have met any demand the International Community have assigned them to meet and they agreed to? Never! The PA has nothing to sell to Israel and Israel has nothing it wants to buy from the PA. Israel is the Seller not the Buyer and the PA must begin getting accustomed to this. Therefore Israel must not capitulate to the PA demands and must stop feed the hand that is standing ready to kill Israelis’ in each way possible, with any concessions or appeasements until the PA show they deserve Israel’s listening ear.

Last year, Condoleezza Rice, at that time still U.S. Secretary of State, reversed American policy and defined as a “settlement” the neighborhood of Har Homa, which has the same legal status as the French Hill, Talpiot, Ramot and Gilo. All of these neighborhoods were annexed to Jerusalem nearly 30 years ago but are not recognized by the international community as part of the capital: Who is Israel lying to but itself? The international community does not openly recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, not even the USA. There is not one foreign Embassy and very few Consulates in Jerusalem. It is most egregious and obnoxious of the USA to interfere in another sovereign country’s internal policy as if the USA has a legal mandate in Israel. Israel, not the USA, must decide what land belongs to her and where Jews can or cannot live. After all, the entire land, west of the Jordan River, is the legal Land of Israel and not one inch legally belongs to an Arab. The land the Arabs live on was and is stolen from Israel and they live on it illegally.

Obama is still delusional thus he has hopes that a “Land for Peace” agreement will end the 100-year-old Zionist-Arab conflict: Obama thinks that Israel has not learned what he refuses to learn. The concept ‘land for peace’ has brought about more war unto Israel and more loss of Israeli lives. The Israeli citizen will not allow such concession to take place again; they are already well learned on this verse. Besides there is no more land to concede as Israel gave back to the Arabs 90% of the land she gained in 1967. So Israel must ask Obama: what land you refer to? Is it Tel Aviv or is it Tel Aviv and Haifa?

Abbas completely dependents on the United States to remain in power he no longer has much of among the Fatah people. His Arab slimy character worked hard and was successful to appeal to Obama’s listening ear now firmly behind him. Abbas does not insist on the return of five million Arabs into Israel. However, he does not say how many Arabs he would ‘insist’ to be allowed into Israel. He also says that he is not trying to “destroy Israel”: Destroy Israel…not now because he cannot but given a chance he will. How do we know this? Abbas rejects Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s demand that the PA recognize Israel as a Jewish state. If it is not a Jewish State, then what is it…in the future, if Abbas has his way, an Arab state? Obama did not ask Abbas to define what type of state he sees Israel to be now and in the future .

Abbas will not resume direct talks with Israel because Netanyahu refuses to immediately accept the principle of creating a PA state on the land of Judea, Samaria and Gaza: is there a base for such state with the irrevocable guarantee that this state will not end up being a extension of Hamastadn or a Fatahstan that will work endlessly to destroy Israel? No such guarantee because the Arabs’ underlined goal is to gain as much land, carved out of Israel, so they can cause more havoc on Israel from the nearest border line.

Abbas [of course] adopts Obama’s idea of a ‘regional peace‘; an overall agreement that will include the return of Golan Heights to Syrian sovereignty: where was Israel when these two agreed on all this? Isn’t right that Israel should be allowed to negotiate and agree on its own providence? These two—one is a president of a country and the other one is a leader of a terror organization and a Holocaust denier—behave as if Israel is nothing but a name, not a sovereign nation and a member of the International Community that it is. Israel is the only country in the world that every other foreign leader sees fit to muddle in its affairs. It is time that Israel takes a stand and disallows any nation, even not the USA, to muddle in its affair, as it is responsible and capable enough to do so all by itself.

Now, when the Arab world has their man in the White House, this little Jordanian King Abdullah II is raising his bar demanding that Israel must accept the Saudi 2002 Plan offer that, if met by Israel, it will ‘finally be recognized by the 56-member Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), which includes Iran: who this Abdullah is kidding? How delusional can one be? What is he smoking or taking? More so, Amr Mussa, the Arab League secretary declared that the monarch simply misunderstood the gist. The OIC is not prepared to wave the Israeli flag over their capitals as Obama has [dreamt] suggested. Why don’t they all coordinate their insane declarations?

The Obama administration, supported by the mass media, is continuously failing to mention how miserably the PA failed to meet any, even one, of the previous American demands, such as halting incitement against Israel: why does Israel have to cave in and meet one demand? Israel must make it clear to the world that this unilateral business has come to final end; cease and desist. The more toughness Israel shows, the less it will be pestered.

Since Obama works for the Arabs, he accepted most of the PA demands, including Israeli surrender of the Old City of Jerusalem: who manages Israel? Obama or the Israeli government elected by the Israel citizens? Obama can hardly manage his own country therefore Israel must make it clear to him to stay away from her affairs.

Finally, Obama has to learn to separate the Israeli-Arab conflict, regional peace and Iran’s fast progressing nuclear ambitions: like Israel, the Arab nations and the Western world fear that Iran might use nuclear capability to dominate the Muslim world if not more that just the Muslim world. If a nuclear bomb hits Israel it will not discriminate a Jew from an Arab; they will all die. And then there will be no more Israeli-Arab conflict Obama is so pre occupied with but a major world in trauma for him to deal [or not to deal] with. Is this what Obama is seeking; to destroy the world? He is sure heading this way!

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk