Doc's Talk: "Sick"

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

"Sick"

There's a double entendre here. What I am referring to IS sick, as a way of thinking. And it makes me quite sick to my stomach, as I am guessing it will many of my readers. Sick, because I'm swallowing rage.

To whit:

The Jerusalem Post reports on "growing support in the Cabinet and the Knesset" for the release of Marwan Barghouti. Why? Because he's now been elected to the Fatah Central Committee and stands a chance to become Abbas's replacement.

As far as I can see, this "growing support" comes primarily from members of Labor, who are indeed in the coalition, and members of Kadima, who are opposition members in the Knesset. Are we surprised by this? We shouldn't be. But get a load of the argument from Minority Affairs Minister Avishay Braverman:

"In light of the election results, we must consider releasing him in order to create a moderate and strong political leadership among the Palestinians."

To create a moderate leadership???

~~~~~~~~~~

Barghouti was sentenced in 2004 to five life terms for his involvement in the murder of five Israelis and a Greek monk. He gave orders, and, according to the court, "was responsible for providing the field units with money and arms…." And that was just what we got him on -- his involvement with terrorism was far more extensive than this. In 33 other cases he was not convicted because of lack of evidence of direct involvement, which doesn't mean that he wasn't involved, but rather that he distanced himself sufficiently even though he helped and sanctioned.

Barghouti helped to found, and led, the Tanzim, a terrorist group associated with Fatah, which during the Intifada was responsible for some 50% of the terrorist attacks being inflicted upon Israel. Tanzim militia was responsible for the attack at a bat mitzvah party in Hadera, during which six were killed and over 30 wounded. Israeli security services firmly established at the time that Barghouti knew of the attack in advance, and give it his blessing.

While he denied it, evidence is strong that he also had significant connections to the terrorist Al Aksa Brigades, which in 2002 claimed him as their leader. Some of the most vicious terrorist attacks were committed by this group.

Put simply, according to Avi Dichter, who spoke in his role as Director of the Shin Bet in 2001, Barghouti was in charge of the ongoing terrorist war against Israel.

~~~~~~~~~~

In an interview in the New Yorker in July 2001, Barghouti declared that if he received a complete withdrawal of Israel to pre-'67 lines, he would still seek "bigger things: one state for all the people." By this he meant that he does not seek coexistence with Israel, but rather Israel's disappearance as a Jewish state.

Barghouti provided an interview with an Arab paper, Al Hayat, on September 29, 2001, in which he described his role in igniting what is called the Intifada (the terrorist war, actually), that began in 2000, ostensibly in response to the presence of Ariel Sharon on the Temple Mount. I have his words, which describe his role in inciting the people.

In an interview in Haaretz in November 2001, he stated that for him Ramallah and Tel Aviv are the same.

Before his sentencing, Barghouti said, "I am a proud Palestinian leader and I oppose the Israeli occupation, it is my duty to do so. What do you want? For us to cooperate with the Israeli occupiers? We will never live doing that."

From his prison cell he has promoted unity with Hamas.

~~~~~~~~~~

You will not hear this elsewhere, so it is imperative that you hear it from me. This is the "moderate" that some very sick Israelis think we should free, because he's charismatic and the Palestinians love him. And this is the man that --as sure as I breath -- the Americans and the EU will "encourage" us to release, so that the "peace process" can be advanced.

Wake up! Precisely WHY do the Palestinians love him? And what does it say about our presumed negotiating partner that they DO embrace him?

Do we lower ourselves this much? To embrace such a man and cut him slack?

Infrastructures Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer (Labor), who promoted release of Barghouti previously, is reported to have said now that Barghouti is the only one who can bring the Palestinians to a final deal with Israel. And what sort of deal would that be? What sort of state would the Palestinian state headed by Barghouti be?

Why are some among us so hungry for a deal that they would see Israel reduced in this fashion? I care less than nothing about how "charismatic" Marwan Barghouti may be. He should never see the light of day again.

If there is justice in Israel -- that is not subverted by politics -- he will not.

~~~~~~~~~~

Let's help make certain that there is justice in this regard.

For now, I want to propose contacting members of the government here, whose information I provide below. These are people who, in the main, are likely to hear what you say, and several of whom would agree with you (Barak probably being a prime exception, but someone who should be contacted). Express your outrage, ask them to make sure they do not make concessions here but, rather, to do everything possible to block release of Barghouti. Briefly explain why. Speak about the necessity for justice.

As we see signs of encouragement from Obama's government or the Congress that we release Barghouti, I will encourage voices to be raised there, as well.

As always, talk to people and write letters to the editor, as well, please! It's simple. Say: here's the truth about the man being promoted as a "moderate" and possible successor to Abbas as president of the PA. Here's the truth about what the PA is really like, that this is the sort of man they endorse. Cite a few of the facts I have provided, and oppose his release.

Here in Israel, share this broadly with others, please.

All phone and fax numbers from the US: 011-972, then drop the "0" and proceed with the rest of the number.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu (Likud)

Fax: 02-670-5369

Phone: 03-610-9898

E-mail: pm_eng2@it.pmo.gov.il (underscore after pm)

Minister for Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya'alon (Likud)
Fax: none provided
Phone: 02-6408891
E-mail: myaalon@knesset.gov.il

Defense Minister Ehud Barak (Labor)
Fax: 02-6496117
Phone: 02-6753223
E-mail: ehudb@knesset.gov.il

Interior Minister Eli Yishai (Shas)
Fax: 02-6662909
Phone: 02-6408406/7
E-mail: eyishay@knesset.gov.il

Minister Benny Begin (Likud)
Fax: none provided
Phone: 02-6408022
E-mail: bbegin@knesset.gov.il

National Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau (Yisrael Beitenu)
Fax: none provided
Phone: 02-6408055/4
E-mail: ulandau@knesset.gov.il

Science and Technology Minister Daniel Hershkovitz (Habayit Hayehudi)
Fax: 02-6496159
Phone: 02-6496100
E-mail: dhershkovitz@knesset.gov.il

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman (Yisrael Beitenu)
Fax: 02-6408921
Phone: 02-6408388/9
E-mail: aliberman@knesset.gov.il

Minister of Information Yuli Edelstein (Likud)
Fax: 02-6758919
Phone: 02-6408392
E-mail: yedelstein@knesset.gov.il

Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz (Likud)
Fax: 02-6496579
Phone:02-6408044/5
E-mail: ysteinitz@knesset.gov.il

Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz (Likud)
Fax: 02-6496525
Phone:02-6408172/4
E-mail: yiskatz@knesset.gov.il

Internal Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovitch (Yisrael Beitenu)
Fax: none provided
Phone: 02-6408825
E-mail: iaharon@knesset.gov.il

Tourism Minister Stas Misezhnikov (Yisrael Beitenu)
Fax: 02-6753372
Phone: 02-6408111/2
E-mail: smiseznikov@knesset.gov.il

Immigrant Absorption Minister Sofa Landver (Yisrael Beitenu)
Fax: 02-6496744
Phone: 02-6408183/2
E-mail: slandver@knesset.gov.il

Education Minister Gideon Sa'ar (Labor)
Fax: 02-6753525
Phone: 02-6408131/375
E-mail: gsaar@knesset.gov.il

Communication Minister Moshe Kahlon (Likud)
Fax: 02-6408902
Phone: 02-6408365
E-mail: mcachlon@knesset.gov.il

~~~~~~~~~~
see my website www.ArlenefromIsrael.info

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk