In a West Bank Culture of Conflict, Boys Wield the Weapon at Hand is Jodi Ruderon's seeming contribution to the start of a new intifada or rather to the on-going current "low-intensity conflict" (if you search that term at this blog, you should be able to findover 80 weekly to bi-weekly reports of many hundreds of incidents of stone-throwing, molotov/firebomb tossing as well as shootings and stabbings over the past year). It's as if the NYT is preparing for the breakdown of the talks and what is expected, and indeed promised, to be the next stage: an outbreak of violence.
Of course, her piece could simply be following the B'tselem input she received and felt, stemming from her own personal and professional judgment, that a story on Arab youngsters who feel they must try to kill Jews is worthy of coverage. After all, it's their "hobby":-
"Futility"?
Yehudit Tayar's reports on behalf of Hatzalah of Judea and Samaria have counted 5,635 attacks in the first half of 2013 against Jewish inhabitants of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem, and the Greater Jerusalem regions alone, including 611 molotov cocktail attacks and 5,144 rock attacks. In addition, there were 8 shooting attacks and 3 stabbing attacks. In total, the violence left 1 person dead and 171 injured, including a 3 year-old girl who was seriously injured. The summary is here.
Jodi could have come to me for assistance and suggestions as we have corresponded and I even managed to meet her face-to-face at the American Consulate in Jerusalem, albeit briefly.
My neighbor's son, a 5-month old infant could have been a Bar Mitzvah in a few months. Yehuda Shoham was killed by a rock that came through the windshield of his parents' car traveling home to Shiloh.
And did you know these children (17-year olds actually) play?
Wow. Jodi is getting a bit too joyful here, even if she is simply describing. But she is not, heaven forbid, judgmental in her writing. Note: "settlements" are usually noted as "illegal" but is stone-throwing a crime? In the United States it is as in other civilized places.
Jodi finally gets some stats in:
But, again, her emphasis is on attaching, constantly and consistently, sympathy and understanding to violence and evil.
And this description is downright ridiculously irrelevant:
Wikipedia even notes that
It's a place where they even fly the Nazi flag.
Jews do get a word in.
However, no specific there and I'll quote a note I just received:"How sentimental - or acceptable in terms of journalistic integrity - is it that the Rudoren article describes the deaths of "a man and his 1-year-old son who died" (Asher Palmer and his son Yonatan) without saying the ring leader of the gang hurling the "stones" was convicted of murder? And others from the same gang are on trial on similar charges?"
And I am going to make an educated guess here that Jodi was fed a wrong chronology for this following incident:
I think that stonethowing preceded the gas and our 'hero' Muhammed was simply continuing the "sport".
And here is the problem - with no comment by Ruderon:
And more claptrap:
Jodi, they do it because their grandfathers and great-grandfathers did - because the hate Jews.
Jodi even went out on a field-trip observation for her research:
I'd love to ask Jodi if that was, well, exciting. Really exciting, although not necessarily arousing?
And there's the "play" element:-
Muhammad is also practicing, perhaps, to escalate from stone to knives, like the Fogel Family incident:
Although, again, Ruderon covers for him with a security blanket:
This is a rerun of the "radical chic" of the late 1960s, the new "radical sheikh".
This story is disappointing.
It is imbalanced. It is inadequate. It is swooning in its portrayal. It avoids any humanity for the victims, the Jews. It blames everyone but the "playful" Arabs. Educators to not fulfill their roles and no comment is offered.
^
Of course, her piece could simply be following the B'tselem input she received and felt, stemming from her own personal and professional judgment, that a story on Arab youngsters who feel they must try to kill Jews is worthy of coverage. After all, it's their "hobby":-
“Children have hobbies, and my hobby is throwing stones,” Muhammad [Abu Hashem, 17] explained weeks before his most recent arrest. “A day with a confrontation is better than a free day.”...Here in Beit Ommar...rock throwing is a rite of passage and an honored act of defiance. The futility of stones bouncing off armored vehicles matters little: confrontation is what counts.
"Futility"?
Yehudit Tayar's reports on behalf of Hatzalah of Judea and Samaria have counted 5,635 attacks in the first half of 2013 against Jewish inhabitants of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem, and the Greater Jerusalem regions alone, including 611 molotov cocktail attacks and 5,144 rock attacks. In addition, there were 8 shooting attacks and 3 stabbing attacks. In total, the violence left 1 person dead and 171 injured, including a 3 year-old girl who was seriously injured. The summary is here.
Jodi could have come to me for assistance and suggestions as we have corresponded and I even managed to meet her face-to-face at the American Consulate in Jerusalem, albeit briefly.
My neighbor's son, a 5-month old infant could have been a Bar Mitzvah in a few months. Yehuda Shoham was killed by a rock that came through the windshield of his parents' car traveling home to Shiloh.
And did you know these children (17-year olds actually) play?
When they are not actually throwing stones, the children here play Arabs and Army, re-enacting the clashes and arrests. And when 17-year-old Bilal Ayad Awad was released in June after 16 months in prison, he was welcomed like a war hero with flags and fireworks, women in wedding finery lining the streets to cheer his motorcade.
Wow. Jodi is getting a bit too joyful here, even if she is simply describing. But she is not, heaven forbid, judgmental in her writing. Note: "settlements" are usually noted as "illegal" but is stone-throwing a crime? In the United States it is as in other civilized places.
Jodi finally gets some stats in:
The Israeli Army commander in the area counts 5 to 15 stone-throwing incidents per week, and the July 8 arrest of Muhammad and his father, Ahmad, brought to 45 the number of Beit Ommar residents taken into custody since the beginning of 2013, 35 of them ages 13 to 19. A teacher at the local high school said 20 boys missed class while in prison last year. A few, including Muhammad, were out more than 60 days, forcing them to repeat a grade.
But, again, her emphasis is on attaching, constantly and consistently, sympathy and understanding to violence and evil.
And this description is downright ridiculously irrelevant:
Beit Ommar, a farm town with roots in the Roman era,
Wikipedia even notes that
Beit Ummar is believed to be the site of Biblical village of Maarath [Joshua 15:59]
It's a place where they even fly the Nazi flag.
Jews do get a word in.
Menuha Shvat, who has lived in a settlement near here since 1984, long ago lost count of the stones that have hit her car’s reinforced windows. “It’s crazy: I’m going to get pizza, and I’m driving through a war zone,” said Ms. Shvat, who knew a man and his 1-year-old son who died when their car flipped in 2011 after being pelted with stones on Road 60. “It’s a game that can kill.”
However, no specific there and I'll quote a note I just received:"How sentimental - or acceptable in terms of journalistic integrity - is it that the Rudoren article describes the deaths of "a man and his 1-year-old son who died" (Asher Palmer and his son Yonatan) without saying the ring leader of the gang hurling the "stones" was convicted of murder? And others from the same gang are on trial on similar charges?"
And I am going to make an educated guess here that Jodi was fed a wrong chronology for this following incident:
It was the June funeral of a 2-year-old girl accidentally crushed by a relative’s bulldozer that led to his most recent arrest. “They were shooting gas, and I was with my mother in the car while the soldiers’ jeep was entering the town,” Muhammad admitted to a police officer after the arrest. “So I got out and threw stones at them.”
I think that stonethowing preceded the gas and our 'hero' Muhammed was simply continuing the "sport".
And here is the problem - with no comment by Ruderon:
Musa Awad, a teacher at Beit Ommar’s high school,...like many here, views the stone throwers with a mixture of pride at confronting Israel and fear for their safety. “Nobody dares to criticize them and say, ‘Why are you doing this?”
And more claptrap:
They throw because there is little else to do in Beit Ommar — no pool or cinema, no music lessons after school, no part-time jobs other than peddling produce along the road. They do it because their brothers and fathers did.
Jodi, they do it because their grandfathers and great-grandfathers did - because the hate Jews.
Jodi even went out on a field-trip observation for her research:
One Friday in July, two soldiers stood sentry on a hilltop several hundred yards inside the village. Five border police officers were stationed under an olive tree near the wholesale fruit market. More soldiers were on nearby rooftops, army jeeps in the middle of a road.
Three young men with slingshots crouched between trees, sending a little brother out to scout. They whipped the woven-string contraptions over their shoulders one, two, three, four times, then the stones disappeared in the distance. Two stones, five, seven. The boy reported that soldiers were coming closer. The young men retreated to a lower ridge.
Two soldiers with riot helmets and rifles appeared on a rock wall a few feet from where the stone throwers had been. Too late.
I'd love to ask Jodi if that was, well, exciting. Really exciting, although not necessarily arousing?
And there's the "play" element:-
Muhammad Abu Hashem participates in a role-playing game constructed around being arrested for throwing stones. Boys wearing fatigues and toting toy guns kicked on the front door and Mr. Abu Hashem opened it, smiling. While one of the “soldiers” checked his green ID card, another imitated a defensive military maneuver to secure the house. “It is a wrong ID,” a boy said in a mixture of Arabic and Hebrew. “Where is Muhammad Abu Hashem?”
Muhammad appeared at the doorway, and was blindfolded with a black sweatshirt. “Come with us,” the soldier-boy ordered. “You are under arrest.” Girls’ screams of mock horror were punctuated with giggles as Muhammad vanished into the midnight darkness.
“You are lucky if you meet Muhammad here next week,” his father said. “He can be arrested for real any moment.”
Muhammad is also practicing, perhaps, to escalate from stone to knives, like the Fogel Family incident:
He recently sneaked into a settlement before dawn to steal apricots he finds especially delicious because they grow on land he sees as stolen from his people.
Although, again, Ruderon covers for him with a security blanket:
One of his hobbies is rescuing abandoned bird eggs and nurturing them in cages warmed by light bulbs until they hatch. “When they fly,” he said, “it’s like a person in prison, and he will take his freedom.”
This is a rerun of the "radical chic" of the late 1960s, the new "radical sheikh".
This story is disappointing.
It is imbalanced. It is inadequate. It is swooning in its portrayal. It avoids any humanity for the victims, the Jews. It blames everyone but the "playful" Arabs. Educators to not fulfill their roles and no comment is offered.
^
No comments:
Post a Comment