The following is an article from Paul Marek (author of the outstanding piece, Why the Peaceful Majority is Irrelevant). Reprinted with permission.
Mubarka is a Canadian born woman of Pakistani
parents. She grew up in Toronto among other Canadian children and
attended university where she received a degree in commerce. Today she
holds a prominent position with a transportation company.
Mubarka used to be as mainstream as any Canadian young adult can
be; in fact, those who met her for the first time may have been struck
by her vivacious personality. Her effervescence went hand in hand with
her distinct Asian beauty which she shamelessly displayed with stylish
clothing including the occasional low cut top. Mubarka used to converse
for hours over topics as varied as business practices in Canadian
politics to contemporary music.
It comes, therefore, as a shock, when one learns what path Mubarka
has recently chosen for herself. She will be wedding a Pakistani man...a
devout Muslim, whom she has never met but who was chosen for her when
she was an infant. Not only that, but she has donned the Hijab for the
first time in her life and is strictly observing Muslim tenets. She has
chosen subservience to a man and subservience to his religion over the
gender freedom offered her by the Western democracy she grew up in, and
she's done so without so much as a whimper of protest.
When asked why she has picked the life of Sharia, Mubarka simply
states that it is as Muhammad would will, and that there is no greater
prophet than Muhammad. When asked how she will raise her children, Mubarka makes it clear...they will be raised as Muslims first, and Canadians second.
Hardi is perhaps one of the most pleasant Canadian women
anyone could ever meet. In her capacity as a caregiver of seniors, she
is gentle, loving, and incredibly patient. She laughs deliciously at the
kind of comical moments that only seniors can deliver and her mood
seems to be permanently stuck on happy. Hardi is an angel.
Those who encounter Hardi for the first time will be struck not by
her character, that comes later, but by the fact that she is virtually
covered from head to toe by traditional Indonesian Muslim attire. She
covers her entire body with colourful costume that leaves only her hands
and face exposed. Hardi is devout, in fact, so devout that during
Christmas any appreciation given her by way of gifting must be void of
any reference to the season. Furthermore, during quiet moments when
Hardi is free to discuss her Muslim faith, it becomes clear she believes
wholeheartedly in the strict observance of Sharia. For her, Islam in
its pure non-secular form, is truth.
Both Hardi and Mubarka present us with a perplexing conundrum because they are members of what has become known as the "peaceful" Muslim majority.
They don't have a violent bone in their bodies, and are clearly law
abiding and productive members of Canadian society. But, they are also
both part of a very small minority within Canada where they and their
fellow Muslims have very little effect on Canadian politics or on the
evolution of Canadian cultural norms. What if though, Hardi and Mubarka
were part of a Muslim majority where they and their co-religionists held
the power?
Both women are Muslims first and Canadians second.
No matter how much respect one may have for either woman's character,
there is little doubt where either would place her loyalty if faced with
choosing between the Canadian traditions of liberty for all, or Sharia.
There is also
little doubt that if they were part of a majority, they would acquiesce
to the demands of the Muslim clerical class and choose Sharia for all
Canadians.
It is therefore irrelevant in the grand scheme of things whether or not Hardi or Mubarka are "good" people; most people on the planet are, no matter their religion, race, or culture. What matters in the greater sense, is that as
parts of the Muslim collective, neither woman would set aside her
Muslim beliefs in order to safeguard and protect the full rights of
non-Muslims to live as they choose. What's even more disturbing, is that both women have experienced the gender freedoms afforded them in Canada, yet both have voluntarily resigned themselves to the greater Muslim collective.
As long as each woman is part of a small minority within Canada, she offers Canada much; but once she becomes part of a significant minority, or heaven forbid, a majority, she becomes dangerous.
Why? Because Muslims wherever they form a majority choose Islamic norms
over the broader more tolerant standards of the West. If given a
chance, as has been clearly demonstrated the world over, they would
unravel hundreds of years of hard fought human rights gains and replace
them with the medieval practices of their faith. As such, both Hardi and
Mubarka are simply bit players in a monstrous and destructive Muslim
vortex that would drag civilization backwards hundreds of years.
No comments:
Post a Comment