Doc's Talk: Palestinian Terrorist Uses Axe to Kill 13-year-old, Wound 7-year-old

Friday, April 03, 2009

Palestinian Terrorist Uses Axe to Kill 13-year-old, Wound 7-year-old

The Israel Project

A terrorist on Thursday (April 2) infiltrated Bat Ayin in the Gush Etzion region of the West Bank and killed Shlomo Nativ, a 13-year-old Israeli boy, by striking him in the head with an axe. [1]

• The terrorist also attacked a 7-year-old boy with the axe, hitting and wounding him in the head. He was taken to Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem and is in moderate condition. [2] • Iran-backed Palestinian Islamic Jihad and an organization calling itself the Imad Mughniyeh Group claimed responsibility for the attack, although this has not been confirmed. [3]

• From Jan. 1 – Feb. 28, 2009 there were 64 terrorist attacks that took place in the West Bank or were carried out by terrorists from the West Bank. [4] Since Israel’s Jan. 18 ceasefire, at least 154 rockets and mortars have been fired at Israel by terrorist groups in Gaza. [5]

A Palestinian terrorist on Thursday (April 2) attacked two Israeli children with an axe, killing one and seriously wounding the other in the town of Bat Ayin in the West Bank. Shlomo Nativ, 13, died after the terrorist struck him in the head with the axe. The second child, 7-year-old Yair Gamliel, suffered moderate injuries. [6]

The terrorist was confronted by a passerby who fought with the assailant and wrestled the axe from him. The terrorist then fled the area and Israeli security forces combed the area in search of him. Residents of the area were asked to remain indoors as the search was conducted. [7]

The passerby, who identified himself as Avinoam, said, “He tried to stab me. I kicked him, he kicked me…I saw the seven-year-old boy running, the axe-wielding terrorist was running after him,…I ran toward the terrorist and he tried to raise the axe over me with the aim of killing me…First I caught the hand holding the axe so that he couldn't kill me, I somehow managed to grab the axe. He succeeded in escaping and I shouted to somebody to run after him.” [8]

Recent Palestinian Attacks and Attempted Attacks on Israelis

2009

On March 15, a Palestinian terrorist shot Israeli Senior Warrant Officer Yehezkel Ramzarkar, 50, and Warrant Officer David Rabinowitz, 42, as they patrolled near the northern Jordan Valley town of Massua. [9] The so-called Imad Mughniyeh Group claimed responsibility for the murder, which occurred when a terrorist cell staged a vehicle breakdown and then shot at a police car that had stopped to assist, killing the two policemen inside. [10]

On March 21, 2009, a large bomb weighing almost 100 lbs. (45 kilos) was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot of a mall in the city of Haifa. A source in the Palestinian Authority said Iran-backed Hezbollah or another Lebanese terror group may have been responsible for the attack. [11]

On March 5, 2009, a Palestinian resident of East Jerusalem attacked a police car and civilian bus with his bulldozer in southern Jerusalem, injuring two police officers. [12]

On Feb. 8, a 19-year-old student from Washington, D.C. who was attending the Hebrew University of Jerusalem was stabbed by three Palestinian teenagers after he got lost in East Jerusalem. The assailants slashed the student in the neck and cheek with a utility knife. [13]

2008

In 2008, there were 762 terrorist attacks originating in the West Bank, including 619 incidents involving the throwing of petrol bombs; 78 instances of small arms fire; 52 incidents involving improvised explosive devices; 10 stabbing attacks; 3 attacks using vehicles and other miscellaneous terrorist incidents. [14]

Despite the attacks, Israel removed more than 100 dirt roadblocks and a number of checkpoints in 2008 to facilitate movement for Palestinians. [15]

Imad Mughniyeh was a commander of the Iran-backed Lebanese terrorist militia, Hezbollah. He was killed in Damascus in February 2008. Various terrorist factions, including Hezbollah, accused Israel of responsibility for Mughniyeh’s death and have threatened to attack Israeli targets in revenge. [16]

Palestinian Islamic Jihad is an Iran-backed terrorist group, which receives $2 million annually from the Islamic Republic, [17] most of which is used exclusively for terrorist attacks and weapons. [18] The group is designated a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S., EU, Australia and Canada. [19]

Contacts Available for Comment

Yael Bosem-Levi, Spokeswoman, Hadassah-Ein Kerem Hospital – Treating injured 7-year old
Tel: 972-50-404-8666

Micky Galin, Spokesman for the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories
Tel.: 972-50-623-4081

Yerucham Mandola, Spokesman for Israel’s Medical Emergency Service Magen David Adom
Cell: 972-52-256-9955; Email: dover@mdais.co.il

Micky Rosenfeld, Israel Police Spokesman
Tel: 972-50-627-5870

Dr. Jonathan Spyer
Fields: Middle East Affairs, Israel-Palestinian Affairs, International Relations
Affiliation: Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center at the Inter-Disciplinary Center in Herzliya.
Cell: 972-52-878-3591
E-mail: jspyer@idc.ac.il

Daniel Diker
Fields: Contemporary Middle Eastern affairs, Internal Palestinian conflict in Gaza, freedom of press in Palestinian territories
Affiliation: Director of Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA); serves as Knesset Affairs correspondent for Israel Broadcasting Authority’s English news
Contact via Adam Shay, JCPA Project Coordinator
Tel.: 972-2-561-9281; 972-2-563-2947

Footnotes

[1] Pfeffer, Anshel; Lis, Jonathan; Shragai, Nadav, “13-year-old killed in West Bank terror attack,” Haaretz, April 2, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1075941.html

[2] Pfeffer, Anshel; Lis, Jonathan; Shragai, Nadav, “13-year-old killed in West Bank terror attack,” Haaretz, April 2, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1075941.html

[3] Pfeffer, Anshel; Lis, Jonathan; Shragai, Nadav, “13-year-old killed in West Bank terror attack,” Haaretz, April 2, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1075941.html

[4] “Monthly Review of Palestinian Terrorist Activity: February 2008,” Israel; General Security Services, http://www.shabak.gov.il/SiteCollectionImages/ñ÷éøåú%20åôøñåîéí/ðúåðéí%20òãëðééí/feb09/monthly-review-feb09.pdf (Hebrew)

[5] "News of Terrorism and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, March 24-31, 2009," Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/ipc_e020.htm

[6] Weiss, Efrat, "Teen killed in West Bank terror attack," YnetNews, April 2, 2009, http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3696287,00.html

[7] Pfeffer, Anshel; Lis, Jonathan; Shragai, Nadav, “13-year-old killed in West Bank terror attack,” Haaretz, April 2, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1075941.html

[8] “‘He tried to stab me. I kicked him, he kicked me.’,” Haaretz, April 2, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1075967.html

[9] “Victims of Palestinian Violence and Terrorism since September 2000,” Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accessed April 2, 2009, http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+since+2000/Victims+of+Palestinian+Violence+and+Terrorism+sinc.htm

[10] Lappin, Yaakov, “Mughniyeh Group behind shooting,” The Jerusalem Post, March 16, 2009, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1237114833392

[11] Einav, Hagai, “Police dismantle bomb planted near shopping mall,” YnetNews, March 22, 2009, http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3689908,00.html; Issacharoff, Avi; Harel, Amos; Eyadat, Fadi, “PA source: Iran-backed group may be behind Haifa bomb attempt,” Haaretz, March 23, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1073099.html0020

[12] “Two policemen hurt in bulldozer terror attack in Jerusalem,” Haaretz, March 5, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1068909.html

[13] Lefkovits, Etgar; Cheifetz, Tori, “US student knifed by Arabs in e. J'lem,” The Jerusalem Post, Feb. 9, 2009, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1233304715382

[14] “Statistics and Trends of Palestinian Terrorism: Yearly Review 2008,” Israel General Security Services, December 2008, http://www.shabak.gov.il/SiteCollectionImages/ñ÷éøåú%20åôøñåîéí/2008-terror-summary.pdf (Hebrew)

[15] Interview with IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, April 2, 2009

[16] Black, Ian, “Profile: Imad Mughniyeh,” The Guardian, Feb. 13, 2009, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/13/israelandthepalestinians.terrorism; “‘We'll soon avenge Mughniyeh's death’,” The Jerusalem Post, Aug. 23, 2008, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1219218617708

[17] “Terrorist Organization Profile: Palestinian Islamic Jihad,” Start: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, March 1, 2008, http://www.start.umd.edu/start/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile.asp?id=82

[18] “The Islamic Jihad,” YnetNews, Dec. 22, 2007, http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3484933,00.html

[19] “Terrorist Organization Profile: Palestinian Islamic Jihad,” Start: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, March 1, 2008, http://www.start.umd.edu/start/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile.asp?id=82

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk