Doc's Talk: The 'Irgun', Jewish Sovereignty and re-proclamation of the Land of Israel

Saturday, April 16, 2011

The 'Irgun', Jewish Sovereignty and re-proclamation of the Land of Israel

Nurit Greenger –April 15, 2011

The story of Baruch Baruch Mizrahi, an Arab turned a Jew and join the Irgun* to fight for the establishment of the State of Israel is fascinating.(http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/143529(

What I find most interesting is how much we do NOT KNOW about non-Jews who scarified and helped the Jewish Nation to realize its Homeland. And now, sadly, the gutless, cowardice, clueless Olsoids unJews, who mismanage the country, are giving the State of Israel away, portion after portion to the State's enemies, with the leading horrific idea of a "Palestine" that will end the Jewish state. An idea is going around named "Operation Joshua": http://grendelreport.posterous.com/never-again-is-now-operation-joshua-one-voice; it is based on the biblical story of Joshua who marched around the city of Jericho blowing the shofar-the horn, until the walls of Jericho fell. We now live in Joshua times of the 21st Century and we must issue a Joshua call until the wall of silence on the United States President's position on an upcoming vote, this coming September 2011, at the United Nations, to establish a Palestinian State, is voiced clearly.

We must know what are Mr. Obama's intentions, regarding any attempt by the world community to establish a Palestinian state under the purview of a United Nations mandate? And, whether Obama stands, unequivocally, against such a resolution and if he does, then we want to know if he will commit to this position today.

'Operation Joshua', One Voice, One Demand to Stop the UN from a possible declaration of a "Palestine," in this coming September, is a good idea. However, besides taking this action, before September 2011, the Government of Israel must return JEWISH Law to the whole of Eretz Israel-the Land of Israel, from the west bank of the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea beaches. The Government of Israel must send the JEWISH police and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to these areas to resume sovereignty, the Jewish Nation lost when it was exiled 2000 years ago.

Jews must resume their sovereignty over all locations where the Islamic invaders would like to steal from Israel. All that land is Jewish National territories, since thousands of years ago, and no government is entitled to "give" that Land away to anyone. This Land was given to the Jews by G-d!

During the 2000 years, in which time, Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel was temporarily ceased and the Jews lived in the Galut-in exile, no other country claimed being sovereign-having sovereignty, in Eretz Israel-Land of Israel. This because G-d had His Finger in it.

Since the "Yishuvniks" - the Jews who settled in Palestine - were declared a government, in 1948, they have abandoned, almost officially, much of our Jewish Heritage, including Temple Mount, large tracks of Hebron, sections of Yehuda and Shomron and even portions of Jerusalem. This most scandalously and despicable act continues, still today, unabashedly.

If the Jewish people, in Israel and worldwide, refuse to take actions to take back all these territories, no action, such as Operation Joshua, an appeal, declaration or protest will not mean a thing; naught!

I pray Israel and all Jews got this, all right?

___

Irgun - shorthand for 'Irgun Tzva'i Le'umi be'Eretz Yisra'el, "National Military Organization in the Land of Israel", or 'Irgun Tzva'i Lochem (That fights) be'Eretz Yisra'el, was a underground Zionist group that operated in the British Mandate of Palestine between 1931 and 1948. The Irgun was an offshoot of the Haganah-which means 'The Defense', the larger Jewish Paramilitary organization that was active in Palestine. Since the group originally broke from the Haganah, it became known as the Haganah Bet, in Hebrew, literally "Defense 'B'" or "Second Defense (Force)", or alternatively, as Haganah Leumit-National Defense. Irgun members were absorbed into the Israel Defense Forces at the start of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War (Israel's War of Independence). In present-day Israel, the Irgun is commonly referred to as Etzel (אצ"ל), an acronym of the Hebrew initials of 'Irgun Tzva'i Le'umi or 'Irgun Tzva'i Lochem.

האצ"ל", ריבונות יהודית והכרזה מחודשת על ארץ ישראל

נורית גרינגר – אפריל 15 2011

הסיפור על ברוך מזרחי הערבי שהפך יהודי וחבר האירגון* שנלחם להקמת מדינת ישראל הוא מרתק לכשעצמו.

מה שמעניין אותי במיוחד זה כמה שאנחנו לא יודעים על אנשים, לא יהודים, שהקריבו ועזרו לעם ישראל לממש את המולדת שלו. ועצוב לומר שעכשיו ה'דראק' הפחדן, חסר כל מושג, היהודים-שהם לא יהודים שתומכים בהסכמי אוסלו, ש[לא]מנהלים את המדינה נותנים, חלק אחר חלק, את מדינת ישראל לאויביה עם הראיון המוביל המחריד של מדינת "פאלסטין" שייסיים את קיומה של המדינה היהודית.

בימים אילו מפיצים את הרעיון של "מבצע יהושע"**, רעיון המבוסס על הסיפור המקראי של יהושע בן נון, אשר צעד לאורך חומות העיר יריחו ותקע בשופר עד שחומות יריחו נפלו. כיום אנו חיים בזמני יהושע של המאה ה-21 ונדרש מאיתנו לקרוא את קריאת יהושע עד שקיר השתיקה על עמדתו של נשיא ארה"ב, על ההצבעה שתוכרז באו"ם, בספטמבר 2011 הקרוב, להקים מדינה פלסטינית, תהיה מובנת, לחלוטין, לכולנו.

אנחנו חייבים לדעת מה הן כוונותיו של מר אובמה, לגבי כל ניסיון על ידי הקהילה הבינלאומית להקים מדינה פלסטינית תחת אחריות המנדט של האו"ם? והאם אובמה עומד, חד משמעית, נגד החלטה כזאת, ואם כך, אז אנחנו רוצים לדעת האם הוא יתחייב לעמדה הזו היום.

'מבצע יהושע', קול אחד, שיחת טלפון אחת, דרישה לעצור את האו"ם מהכרזה אפשרית של "פלסטין" בספטמבר הקרוב, הוא רעיון טוב. עם זאת, מלבד יישום פעולה זו, לפני ספטמבר 2011, ממשלת ישראל חייבת להחזיר את החוק יהודית לכל ארץ ישראל, מהגדה המערבית של נהר הירדן עד לחופי הים התיכון. ממשלת ישראל צריכה לשלוח את המשטרה היהודית ואת שרותי הביטחון הישראליים-צה"ל לאזורים אלו כדי לחדש את ריבונות העם היהודי שם, ריבונות אותה הוא איבד כהוגלה משם לפני 2000 שנה.

היהודים חייבים לחדש את ריבונותם בכל השטחים שאותם הפולש האיסלאמי רוצה לגנוב ממדינת מישראל. כל האדמה הזו הוא אדמת לאום, מזה אלפי שנים, ואין שום ממשלה שהיא רשאית "לתת" אדמה זו לאף אחד. אדמה זו ניתנה ליהודים על ידי אלוהים.

במהלך 2000 שנה כשהריבונות היהודית בארץ ישראל הופסקת זמנית, והיהודים חיו בגלות, אף מדינה אחרת לא טענה ריבונית על או שיש לה ריבונות בארץ ישראל. זה בגלל שאצבע הקב"ה התערבה.

מאז שהיישובניקים - היהודים שהתיישבו בפלסטין - הוכרזו כממשלה, בשנת 1948, הם נטשו, כמעט רשמית, הרבה מהמורשת היהודית שלנו, כולל הר הבית, שטחים גדולים של חברון, קטעים של יהודה ושומרון ואפילו חלקים של ירושלים. המעשה השערורייתי והבזוי ביותר הזה ממשיך כיום, בלי בושה.

אם העם היהודי, בארץ ישראל ובעולם כולו, יסרב לבצע פעולות כדי לקחת בחזרה את כל השטחים הללו, כל פעולה, כגון ,מבצע יהושע,, ערעור, הצהרה או המחאה תהיה ללא כל משמעות; לשווא!
אני מתפלל שמדינת ישראל וכל היהודים מבינים זאת היטב!

*אירגון - הארגון הצבאי הלאומי בארץ ישראל - או אצ"ל, היתה קבוצת מחתרת יהודית ישראל שפעלה בפאלסטין בשנות 1931 עד 1948.

**http://grendelreport.posterous.com/never-again-is-now-operation-joshua-one-voice

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk