Doc's Talk: Gaza Isn't Warsaw Ghetto

Monday, August 15, 2011

Gaza Isn't Warsaw Ghetto

Nurit Greenger

On August 14, 2011Israel National News published an article, 'Humanitarian Crisis: Gaza Exporting Aid! - http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/146719

If the Gazan 'humanitarian crisis' has grown so deep how come its residents are now exporting aid to Somalia?

The tender, caring folks of the world insist on comparing Gaza to Warsaw Ghetto. Well, didn't the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto take up collections to aid their impoverished brethren in other war zones? This comparison should have the world rolling on their sides in derisive laughter. But no, they really feel the need to break the Israeli blockade on Gaza and end the non-existing "humanitarian disaster" there. The state of health, rate of infant mortality and longevity are better in the Gaza Strip than in Turkey, which is the sponsor and patron of the "aid flotillas" to Gaza. What a farce! What a Machiavellian joke. The problem is not with the anti-Semitic world that is hunting Jews, rather with the state of Israel, because Israel does not make her case right and clear, never did.

Some truth is unfolding right in front of our eyes.

A great number of Arab claims to falsehood and crisis are about to implode.

Gaza has been revealed to be prosperous, not a "Ghetto."

The Israeli Left [unJews], cheerleading and aiding and abetting the Arab's deception and their goal to destroy Israel are gradually ending their cycle in Eretz Israel; just as their "Gaza unilateral disengagement first" process has imploded.

Their conspiracies to govern Israel without true mandates are ending. Even Shimon Peres was slapped down after he was caught conducting secret negotiations with Mahmoud Abbas with no mandate. Sadly, this is Peres' notorious standard procedure with "negotiating" the Oslo Accords as the feather in the cap of his ongoing unmandated conduct.

The "peace process," ala Oslo Accords has abrogated itself, long ago. But it is now crystal clear that it was Israel, and Israel alone to have put any weight – and hope – on this agreement that became worthless the very same day when the first suicide bomber blew himself up in Israel – the second intifada [an Arabic word that translates into English as "uprising"] - taking with him the lives of innocent Israelis, just because the Arabs' mindset is that they are mandated, by their 'God', to kill Jews.

The Second Intifada, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, and the Oslo War, was the second Arab uprising, a period of intensified Arab violence, which began in late September 2000, seven years after the Oslo Accords were signed. The death toll to Israel is over 1100 Israelis, yet Israel still, today, talks about achieving "peace." Peace with whom? With the devil?

By using this political artifact the pro-Oslo camp were unable to destroy the advent of a real Jewish State.

The present "social protests" in Israel, most of it is the Left's alternative plan to sabotage the state, this after they have failed at this goal along the Oslo "peace process", is also fading away even if their talking heads continue to "report" on it.

These protests amassed, at their peak, enough "protesters", using huge funds from overseas donor states and others, to possibly elect, in any future election, about three Members of Knesset to work for them. Today the Left holds on to enough numbers that would possibly elect them two Members of Knesset.

In two months Israel will begin production drilling of natural gas and production for consumption will start in mid 2012. Crude Oil will start flowing later, probably before November 2012.

Checkmate.

Sadly, Israel is so damned careful about pussyfooting "diplomatically" that she ends up looking like someone with a guilty conscience. The time is now to tell the unvarnished truth, right between the eyes.

---

עזה היא לא גטו ורשה

אוגוסט 15, 2011 – ט"ו באב 5771

נורית גרינגר

קובץ: מגיע הזמן שבו אדם לא יכול עוד לשמוע שקרים, הונאה ואחיזת עיניים שבהם משתמשים אנשים – הערבים ועוזריהם - בניסיון להסתיר את האמת. זמן זה הוא עכשיו כי בעוד ששקרים ניתנים להוכחה שהם שקרים, האמת תמיד תזהור בבהירות.

***

עזה היא לא גטו ורשה

אוגוסט 15, 2011 – ט"ו באב 5771

נורית גרינגר

ב-14 באוגוסט 2011 החדשות הלאומיות של ישראל פרסם מאמר, 'משבר הומניטרי: עזה מייצאת סיוע'

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/146719

אם ה-"משבר ההומניטרי" בעזה גדל כל כך איך תושביה כיום מייצאים סיוע לסומליה?

האנשים טובי הלב בעולם, שאכפת להם כל כך, מתעקשים להשוות את עזה לגטו ורשה. ובכן, האם יהודי גטו ורשה לא אספו תרומות לעזור לאחיהם העניים באזורי מלחמה אחרים? השוואה זו צריכה לגרום לעולם להתגלגל על צדו בצחוק לגלגני. אבל לא, הם באמת מרגישים שיש צורך לשבור את המצור הישראלי על עזה ולסיים את ה-"אסון ההומניטרי" שלא קיים שם. מצב הבריאות, שיעור תמותת התינוקות ותוחלת חיים טובים יותר ברצועת עזה מאשר בטורקיה, שנותנת את חסות הפטרון שלה ל-"משטי הסיוע" לעזה. איזו מהתלה, בדיחה איזו בדיחה מקיאוולית.

הבעיה היא לא עם העולם האנטישמי שנמצא במסע ציד של היהודים, אלא עם מדינת ישראל, כי ישראל לא מציגה את המקרה שלה נכון וברור, ומעולם לא עשתה זאת.

האמת מתגלמת ממש מול עינינו:

מספר רב של תביעות הערבים לשקרים ומשברים עומדות לקרוס.

עזה התגלה להיות משגשגת, לא "גטו".

קבוצת השמאל הישראלית [אנג'וז], המעודדת, מסייעת והשותפה לתרמית הערבית ומטרתם להשמיד את ישראל, בהדרגה מסיימת את מחזוריותה בארץ ישראל, בדיוק כמו שתהליך ה-"התנתקות חד צדדית ראשונה מעזה" כבר קרס.

הקונספירציות שלהם למשול בישראל ללא מנדטים אמיתיים עומדות להגמר. אפילו שמעון פרס קיבל נזיפה ונעצר במעשיו אחרי שנתפס שהוא ניהל משא ומתן חשאי עם אבו מאזן, ללא מנדט. למרבה הצער, זה הנוהל המקובל הידוע לשמצה של פרס וה-"משא ומתן" שניהל באוסלו הוא הנוצה בכובע של מנהגיו חסרי המנדט אותם הוא מנהל מזה שנים.

"תהליך השלום", א-ל-א הסכמי אוסלו כבר ביטל את עצמו, לפני זמן רב. אבל עכשיו זה ברור כשמש שישראל, וישראל בלבד שמה על ההסכם משקל - ותקווה - הסכם שהפך חסר ערך באותו יום שמחבל ההתאבדות הראשון פוצץ את עצמו בישראל - האינתיפאדה השנייה [מילה ערבית שמתרגמת ל"מרד"] - ולקח איתו את חייהם של ישראלים חפים מפשע, רק בגלל שתפיסת הערבים היא שיש להם מנדט, מה- 'אלוהים' שלהם, להרוג יהודים.

האינתיפאדה השנייה, המכונה גם אינתיפאדת אל אקצא, מלחמת אוסלו, היתה ההתקוממות הערבית השנייה, תקופה של אלימות ערבית חריפה, שהחלה בסוף ספטמבר 2000, שבע שנים אחרי שהסכמי אוסלו נחתמו. מניין ההרוגים בישראל הוא מעל ל- 1,100 ישראלים, אך ישראל עדיין, היום, מדברת על השגת "שלום". שלום עם מי? עם השטן?

באמצעות חפץ פוליטי זה מחנה תומכי אוסלו לא היו מסוגלים להרוס את שחר המדינה היהודית האמיתית.

"המחאה החברתית" הנוכחית בישראל, רובה היא תוכנית חלופית של השמאל לחבל במדינה, זה אחרי שהם נכשלו במטרה זו לאורך "תהליך השלום" של אוסלו, הוא גם הולך ונמוג גם אם ראשי המדברים שלו ממשיכים ל-"דו"ח "עליו.

מחאות אלה צברו, בשיאן, מספיק "מפגינים", באמצעות קרנות ענק ממדינות תורמות בחו"ל ואחרים, כדי לעזור לבחור, בבחירות עתיד, בכשלושה חברי כנסת שיעבדו בשבילם. היום השמאל נאחז במספרים שאולי יבחרו בשבילם שני חברי כנסת.

בעוד חודשיים ישראל תתחיל בקידוח הפקה של גז טבעי וייצור לצריכה יתחיל באמצע 2012. נפט גולמי יתחיל לזרום מאוחר יותר, כנראה לפני נובמבר 2012.

מט!

למרבה הצער, ישראל היא כל כך זהירה לגבי ביצועיה ה-"דיפלומטים", שהיא בסופו של דבר נראית כמישהו שיש לו מצפון לא נקי. השעה הגיעה לספר את האמת ללא כחל ושרק, ישר בין העיניים!

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk