Sultan Knish
Romney has landed in Jerusalem and Obama is threatening to visit Israel
in his second term. This seems like good news for Americans, but
presidential and pre-presidential visits are often bad news for
Israelis.
Romney's trip itinerary covering the UK, Israel and Poland is a clever
road map critique of Obama's foreign policy. Kerry and Obama both
campaigned on a promise to fix America's broken relations with its
allies. Romney is subtly doing the same thing, paying a visit to allies
alienated by the last three years.
When Obama first visited Israel the contentious Democratic primaries had
just wrapped up and Jewish voters and organizations had thrown their
support to Hillary Clinton. Obama had Jewish leftists, but he didn't
have more middle-of-the-road Jewish Democrats. And additionally paying a
visit to the home of the Little Satan was a way of dispelling
suspicions about his Muslim roots.
Obama hasn't bothered with a visit to Israel, but he hasn't bothered
appearing in person at the NAACP either. And that's all for the best.
Israel needs a visit from Obama about as much as it needs more of the
"mysterious fires" being set as part of the Arson Jihad.
A presidential visit to most other countries is a formality while a
presidential visit to Israel is an unpleasantness. Presidents who visit
Israel must also stop off for a visit with the terrorist leaders.
Presidents don't just stop by, have a pita, smell the flowers and do
some handshakes. Instead they arrive tasked with peacemaking duties and
then they task everyone else with their peacemaking.
There is something intriguing, though little good, about Putin's visit
to Israel, because it at least has the air of unpredictability.
Presidential visits to Israel however are painfully predictable. There
is never anything new that comes out of those trips and nothing good
either. They are a lot like family reunions, pleasant in theory, but
uncomfortable in practice. Both have a special relationship that they
can never quite define and the visits always carry with them an aura of
disappointment.
A Presidential visit has the air of a boss coming downstairs to check up
on a lazy employee. On arrival, there are the customary expressions of a
hope for peace. In private whatever Prime Minister is in office will be
upbraided for still not having achieved peace. At a joint press
conference in a capital that the United States still doesn't recognize,
after the usual formalities about the special relationship and the
commitment to Israel's security, the President will tell reporters that
more sacrifices are needed for peace.
"And next time I talk to you there had better be peace," is the unspoken message always left hanging in the air.
The pre-presidential visits are less of a chore, but no more
significant. Candidates stop by Israel the way that they do any other
state. They visit a few significant places, have their picture taken
there, get a brief tour from local officials and fly over the narrowest
point in Israel's border as a demonstration of just how strategically
precarious the situation is.
Like all practiced politicians they are very understanding of the
problems that their hosts have, whatever those problems might be. They
emphasize that unlike the last guy from the other party, they will not
pressure Israel to make more concessions. And then a few years later
they are disembarking from an airplane and frowning at the lack of peace
on the airport tarmac. "Where is that damn peace already? I ordered it
last week."
Israel would be best served if the next American President forgot that
Israel even existed or decided that it was a small country like Slovenia
or Fiji, and need not be bothered with. A great month would be a month
that passed without any State Department statements on Israel or a
single question or answer from the White House Press Secretary about
that small country wedged in between much bigger countries where frankly
more interesting things are going on right now.
Instead no one ever forgets Israel. It's the one country that the
Western world and the Muslim world are equally obsessed with. Asia is
mystified by that obsession and has been ever since the days when it was
being flooded by Nazi propaganda about the Jews controlling the world,
even while penniless Jewish refugees were showing up in China and Japan.
The Jews not only don't control the world, they don't even control their
own borders or get to name their own capital. And not a day passes by
without some pundit putting paws to iPad and pounding out some turgid
prose about the hopes for peace that can only be realized when the
warmongering Israelis get over the Holocaust and help the terrorist
gangs of Fatah and Hamas have their own state.
Other countries have art, science, historical marvels and gleaming
beaches. Israel has those things but they don't exist in the official
narrative. The backbreaking labor of nearly a century is nothing more
than a minor mention in yet another news story about Israeli checkpoints
preventing pregnant women and suicide bombers from reaching Jerusalem
quickly enough.
The dark cloud of the eternal peace process overshadows everything that
Israel is and does. And it defines its relationship with American
leaders who on their initial visits may see Israel as a place but on
their succeeding visits see it as a problem in need of a Two-State
Solution.
The American-Israeli relationship began when the United States began
running out of Muslim allies in the Middle East. It began to decline
when the United States pulled Egypt out of the Soviet camp. It has gone
up and down each time administrations have gone looking for long term
relationships in the Muslim world. The American and Israeli governments
have been like a couple that had to settle for each other because they
have no one else.
Israel lost its French paramour and the United States never found a
Muslim Middle Eastern country that was reliably friendly and whose
leaders didn't need the US Marines to protect them from their own
people. Despite its best diplomatic efforts, the United States has never
found anyone else, but that doesn't stop it from constantly lecturing
Israel on its shortcomings and reminding it how their special
relationship is preventing the United States from getting any of the
gorgeous Muslim states it could have had.
Obama was the best bid for landing a special relationship with the
Muslim world, but despite his best efforts, no such relationship has
materialized. But the blame for that, as usual, doesn't go to Obama, it
goes to the Israelis for scaring away all the potential dates. In
Washington D.C. the diplomats brood over their latest plans for landing
Iran or fixing Egypt so that they can dump Israel for good, and the
Israelis try to flirt with China or Russia; but in the end they all have
to go home together because there is no one else.
Israel and America are stuck with each other. America needs a reliable
partner in the Middle East whose government won't suddenly fall and be
replaced by Jihadist maniacs and Israel needs a friend whose leaders
don't openly talk about how much they hate it. It's not exactly a match
made in heaven, but for two democracies with a certain amount of shared
history and shared problems, it's all they have.
There's not much special about the visits back and forth by American and
Israeli leaders. Mostly they sound like an old married couple having
the same argument for the thousandth time "Make peace with the
Palestinians!" "Do something about Iran or I will." And then with
nothing accomplished everyone goes home with gritted teeth.
There are high hopes that a new president will be different and that
this time the cycle will be broken but then a few years later we are
right back where we started and usually worse off. After a while all the
headlines run together in smears of ink, the broadcasts full of earnest
reporters standing against some dark background somberly reporting
about another blow to the hopes of peace all seem the same no matter how
many fashions have changed and how many decades have passed.
The United States expects Israel to fix its problems with the Muslim
world by completing the peace process. But the problem with this
Two-State Solution is that Israel isn't the source of the problems in
the Muslim world. America's problems with Islam come from the same place
as Russia's problems with Islam and as everyone else's problems with
Islam.
Nevertheless the thinking goes that when Israel finally builds its own
special relationship with the Muslim world, the United States will be
able to build its special relationship with the Muslim world too. And
when every president sits down at the table and is given his briefings,
those briefings place Muslim violence in the context of Israel. And
Israel becomes the Zionist Knot that has to be cut to untangle the
hostility of 1 billion Muslims.
It's easier to cut up Israel than it is to deal with the possibility
that Islam's internal conflicts and external hostilities might not be
solvable. That they are something that we have to deal with without any
easy short cuts through Jerusalem. And politicians are nothing if not
fans of the easy way out. Presidential candidates may come and go, they
may fly over and look at how narrow Israel is, meet with generals and
soldiers in the field, and farmers and ranchers in their own fields, but
when they leave then the Jewish State, that small elongated strip of
land, becomes the knot that must be cut to make the Muslim world stop
the killing and love America.
(a shortened version of this article appeared previously at Times of Israel)
No comments:
Post a Comment