Bruce Thornton On July 31, 2012 @ 12:44 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage
Republican
presidential candidate Mitt Romney is under attack for speaking an
important truth about the Arab-Israeli conflict. At a fundraiser in
Jerusalem on Monday, Romney made the obvious, even banal, point about
the economic disparity between nations. Speaking of Israel and the
Palestinian-run West Bank, Romney said, “Culture makes all the
difference.” Rejecting the geographic determinism that claims geography,
climate, and species distribution account for the greater power and
wealth of the West, Romney added, “you look at Israel and you say you
have a hard time suggesting that all of the natural resources on the
land could account for all the accomplishment of the people here.”
Romney’s point was part of a larger discussion of global economic
disparity that he has brought up previously in numerous speeches and in
his book No Apology, and that scholars like David Landes and Thomas Sowell have developed in their work.
When it comes to Israel, however, no comment, no matter how sound
its scholarly pedigree, that challenges the orthodox narrative favored
by the Arabs and their Western shills will be allowed to pass without
attack. Saeb Erekat, an aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas,
responded, “It is a racist statement and this man doesn’t realize that
the Palestinian economy cannot reach its potential because there is an
Israeli occupation.” Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian legislator and
official in the Palestine Liberation Organization, claimed the
Palestinians “have to build an economy when they have no freedom of
movement, no human rights, no fundamental freedoms.” International
reporting on the remarks backed up the Palestinian interpretation by
citing the “occupation” and “blockade” as the real explanation for why
the Palestinians are failing economically.
These reactions are drearily predictable, including the incoherent
charge of “racism” against somebody making a cultural argument. More
important, once again Palestinian revanchist obsessions, anti-Semitism,
and the jihadist death cult are ignored, and the reasons for Israeli
defensive measures passed over, while Western materialist obsessions
like “racism” “colonialism,” and “national aspirations” are used to
explain destructive behavior the origins of which lie in cultural and
religious dysfunctions.
Thus if you want to explain Palestinian economic backwardness,
start with the Arab rejection of Israel’s legitimacy, one grounded in
Islamic doctrine and culture. For all the duplicitous talk of the
“two-state solution,” a critical mass of Arabs simply does not recognize
Israel’s right to exist. Nor is this rejection a consequence of an
“illegal occupation” of an “Arab homeland” by neo-colonialist Jews
abetted by Western imperialists. When four Arab armies invaded Israel in
1948, its purpose was not to create a Palestinian nation, something
that has no historical reality. Rather, after they destroyed Israel, the
aggressor nations planned to carve up among themselves what was left of
mandatory Palestine. This rejection of Israel has been a constant over
the last 60 years, as historian Efraim Karsh points out: “Had Arafat set
the PLO from the start on the path to peace and reconciliation, instead
of turning it into one of the most murderous terrorist organizations in
modern times, a Palestinian state could have been established in the
late 1960s or the early 1970s; in 1979 as a corollary to the
Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty; by May 1999 as part of the Oslo Process;
or at the very latest with the Camp David summit of July 2000.”
The fact is, Israel was and is an abomination to Muslims not
because there is no Palestinian state, but because it is a country
comprising what Muslims consider dhimmi, a conquered inferior people
whose lands and lives are forfeit to Muslims by decree of Allah. Nor
does it help that Muslims especially loath Jews, hatred based on the
authority of the Koran, Hadiths, and 14 centuries of Islamic theology
and jurisprudence. Hence the rank anti-Semitism rampant among
Palestinian Arabs, who routinely and publicly indulge invective and
genocidal rhetoric redolent of Der Stürmer. The continuing
existence in the Middle East of an economically and militarily powerful
Israel, populated by despised dhimmi, is a daily humiliation for the
peoples who consider themselves the “best of nations” destined to rule
the world. Ending the “occupation” or lifting the defensive blockade of
Gaza wouldn’t change this irrational, religiously sanctioned hatred.
This deep-seated hatred, justified by religion, is also manifested
in Palestinian culture by the cult of martyrdom, murder, and death that
has legitimized terrorist attacks on Israelis for decades. Rather than
promoting secular education, the acquisition of entrepreneurial skills,
and the creation of a legal system conducive to economic development,
too many Palestinians have instead financed, idolized, and reinforced
with public honors the “martyrs” who blow up themselves and innocent
Israelis on the promise of paradise. A people who dress up preschoolers
as suicide bombers and make heroes out of murderers have other
priorities than increasing exports, growing new businesses, or
increasing GDP. Nor is this sickening death-cult the preoccupation of a
fringe. A few years ago, alleged “moderate” Palestinian president
Mahmoud Abbas named a public square in Ramallah after a terrorist who in
1978 killed 38 Israelis, including 13 children. Such hatred is a
cultural dysfunction inimical to the cosmopolitan tolerance necessary in
a globalized economy.
The decades of terrorist assaults on Israel bring us to the truth
always ignored by those who explain Palestinian dysfunction by decrying
“blockades” and “occupation.” All these defensive measures exist for one
reason: the intransigence of Palestinians whose religiously inspired
hatred of Israel and Jews is so great that they will not just send their
children to murder Israelis, but do so knowing they will provoke the
responses that contribute to their failure to develop their economy and
society. Those who complain about the blockade of Gaza never confront
the simple truth that if Hamas stopped raining rockets on Israel and
attempting to export even more lethal weapons, this blockade wouldn’t be
necessary. And if economic development had been a priority for the
Gazans, they wouldn’t have destroyed and plundered the commercial
greenhouses left behind when the Israelis were evacuated in 2005.
Instead of taking over and exploiting this industry, the terrorist
outfits put all their energy into manufacturing more rockets and
smuggling in more weapons.
These are the facts about the condition of the Palestinians that
are ignored by Arab propagandists and Western haters of Israel. Quite
simply, if enough Palestinians had wanted to develop their society and
economy, they would have long before now. Their opportunity came in
1993, when the Oslo accords transferred control over the West Bank to
the Palestinian Authority, which was and continues to be financed by
billions of aid from the West. With control and money, Palestinian
leaders eager for economic development would have stopped terrorist
attacks on Israel, which over time would have lessened the need for
defensive measures like checkpoints and army patrols. They would have
eradicated the cult of martyrdom from popular culture and school
curricula. They would have passed laws that favored businesses, invited
foreign investment, and promoted entrepreneurs. They would have built
universities and other infrastructure. They would have created genuine
democratic governance that respected human rights. And they would have
taken measures to root out the government corruption and cronyism that
have made billionaires of a few Palestinian “leaders” while the mass of
people are compensated with hatred of Israel, genocidal anti-Semitism,
and celebrations of terrorist murderers. But rather than doing all these
things, the Palestinian leadership continued to send terrorists to kill
thousands of Israelis in order to achieve their long-term goal of
destroying Israel.
The reasons for this destructive behavior are obvious. For cultural
and religious reasons, the Palestinians who want to destroy Israel
outnumber those who want to create a state, live in peace, and provide
prosperity to their people. That’s the simple truth, one so toxic for
the haters of Israel that any statement even indirectly alluding to it
must be attacked, as Romney’s was.
No comments:
Post a Comment