Sultan Knish
"War is peace," entered our cultural vocabulary some sixty-four years
ago. Around the same time that Orwell's masterpiece was being printed
up, an armistice was being negotiated between Israel and the Arab
invading armies. That armistice began the long peaceful war or the
warring peace.
The entire charade did not properly enter the realm of the Orwellian
until the peace process began. The peace process between Israel and the
terrorist militias funded by the countries of those invading armies has
gone on for longer than most actual wars. It has also taken more lives
than most actual wars.
War has an endpoint. Peace does not. A peace in which you are constantly
at war can go on forever because while the enthusiasts of war
eventually exhaust their patriotism, the enthusiasts of peace never give
up on their peacemaking.
Warmongers may stop after a few thousand dead, but Peacemongers will pirouette over a million corpses.
As you read this, Obama is probably stumbling through some ceremony or
speech in Israel. The speeches all say the usual things, but there
really is only one purpose to the visit. There really ever only is one
purpose to these visits. The revisiting of the endless peace war.
Two decades after the peace process has failed in every way imaginable.
Two decades after cemeteries on both sides are full of the casualties of
peace. Two decades which have created two abortive Palestinian states
at war with one another and with Israel.
Two decades later, it's still time for peace.
Peace time means that it’s time to ring up some more Israeli concessions
in the hopes of getting the terrorists and their quarreling states back
to the negotiating table for another photo op in the glorious album of
peacemakers. And if the photos are properly posed, perhaps there will
even be another Nobel Peace Prize in it for all the participants.
It would be nice to think that the peace disease was one of those
viruses carried only in the bloodstream of liberals. But it's not.
Every so often I am asked about a solution to the
Israeli-Palestinian-Arab-Muslim conflict and the interrogators are
baffled when I tell them that there is no solution. "No solution at all?
But there has to be a solution. What of all the moderate voices of
goodwill? What of all the mothers who only want to raise their children
to sing happy songs about peace? What about all the old soldiers who are
tired of war? What if we get them all in a room to shake hands and pose
for photos? Then won't there be peace?"
As society has become more progressive, it has become progressively more
difficult to explain even even to intelligent people that the world
simply does not work that way.
For two Cold War generations it was nearly impossible to communicate
that there really would be no peace with the Soviet Union other than the
cold kind maintained by a mutual balance of power. Their children and
grand-children appear equally unequipped to understand that most serious
wars end with either one side definitively losing and fundamentally
changing as a result of that defeat or both sides maintaining a cold
peace that will last only as long as neither side believes that it can
squash the other with a surprise attack.
Israel did have peace until it began peace negotiations. It wasn't a
perfect peace, but aside from the minor problems of the Intifada, a
comparative pinprick set against the violence that began after that
infamous Rose Garden handshake, it was a good time whose like was then
not seen again until Israel stopped playing peace process with the
terrorists and learned to keep them away instead.
But the relative absence of violence, according to the amateur
peacemakers, isn't peace. A wartime peace isn't what they want. What
they want is a peacetime war. Let there be handshakes and suicide
bombings. Let there be bloody bodies scraped off the sidewalk, but let
there also be children's choirs singing about peace. Let a thousand
tombstones rise, so long as everyone can believe that peace is at hand.
This vulgar worship of peace as a religion, a creed that restores the
faith of faithless men and women in humanity is a combination of empty
sentimentality and calculated ignorance.
We must have peace in our time, the peacemakers say. And Israel must
provide it. More territorial concessions must be put on the table. More
goodwill must be shown. More ends must be bent over backward so that the
peacemakers can stare at their televisions and sigh, their faith in the
goodness of every man, woman, child and suicide bomber restored once
again.
Who will Israel make peace with? President Abbas of the Palestinian
Authority, who hasn't run for office since Hamas won the elections,
doesn't want to negotiate. Hamas only wants to negotiate a short-term
pause in its campaign to destroy Israel. When he isn't warring with
Hamas, Abbas is declaring that he shares the same view on terrorism as
Hamas.
Hamas or Abbas, whichever the peacemaker chooses will surely make him an ass.
But peacemakers don't fancy details. They like the big picture. And the
big picture is that there must be an answer. Tens of thousands demanded
it in London before the war and Chamberlain delivered it to them. Peace
arrived in our time, shortly before the Nazi bombers. Thousands more
demanded it of every American president who faced a Communist thug
across a negotiating table. And they got it.
There were nuclear treaties that meant nothing to the Soviets and that
did not bring peace, but that made all the amateur peacemakers feel
better about themselves. And then instead of peace coming across a
negotiating table, the Soviet Union collapsed because a persnickety
cowboy wouldn't give up a missile defense program that every Harvard
graduate knew could never work. And now, as another Harvard graduate
proudly tries to take credit for Israel's Iron Dome, they still know it
can't work.
Reagan didn't end the Cold War with treaties; he ended it by doggedly
pursuing superior firepower. And that is why in the name of peace, the
Harvard grad looking over Iron Dome on his visit to Israel, has shown
Russia his peaceful flexibility by abandoning the final stage of missile
defense. Every Harvard grad knows that missile defense doesn't bring
peace. But what could anyone expect from Reagan? The poor dummy went to
Eureka College. How could he know that defeating the USSR wouldn't work?
Obama wants the same thing from Israel that he's trying to get by
selling out Poland on missile defense. Peace. While the only times
Israel had any measure of peace is in the aftermath of a war, Harvard
grads and the people who listen to them know that peace only comes about
at the tail end of a long string of concessions and appeasement. And
then when you have finally given your tormentor your house keys, your
car keys and your lucky 2-dollar-bill, then having rifled through your
empty pockets, he will finally nod grudgingly and agree to peace at
last.
That is if he doesn't actually want to kill you.
And that is the trouble with peacemakers; they don't really take into
account how to make peace with killers. Most countries lock up violent
murderers when they kill a dozen people for fun. But when they kill a
dozen people in order to liberate other killers or lay claim to a piece
of land, then they are worth negotiating with. And the only outcome of
the negotiations is establishing murder as a negotiating tactic.
Peace leads to war because peacemaking rewards the warmakers. It rewards
the obstinate killers who refuse to stop killing. And the more it
rewards them, the more they kill.
That is why Israel has been decades late in delivering the peace that
all the amateur peacemakers want. Every time it phones Terrorism Inc. to
place an order for peace with extra brotherhood on top, a suicide
bomber pulls up to its front door. And so for two decades, in a pesky
reality of peacemaking that none of the peacemakers care to hear
about... peace has meant war.
Every time a new phase of the endless peace process is launched, more
people die. More people die during the negotiations than otherwise. The
peacemakers explain this by saying that the terrorists who aren't at the
negotiating table are trying to sabotage the terrorists who are at the
negotiating table. The dead are sacrifices for peace and if Israel
fights back against either group of terrorists, then it is guilty of
obstructing the peace process which was otherwise going well.
So here we are with Obama t-shirts on sale to liberal American Jewish
tourists in Jerusalem kiosks, a city whose Jewishness the man on the
t-shirts will not recognize because it would harm the prospects for
peace. And the question on their minds is how are we finally going to
make peace happen.
The rational response is that peace simply isn't going to happen. The
two terrorist groups in their two states were set up for the sole
purpose of destroying Israel. They are funded and supported by those
countries that were attacking Israeli farmsteads with tanks around the
time that Orwell was putting his final touches on "War is Peace, Slavery
is Freedom and Ignorance is Strength."
They are not going to stop trying to destroy Israel because it's all
they know and it's their only reason for existence. And if that weren't
enough, they have spent generations teaching their children to hate and
there is no sign whatsoever of them putting the brakes on the hate
machine which expresses more clearly than anything else that they do not
intend to stop fighting now or even twenty years from now.
Not when their educational system is busy training the suicide bomber of tomorrow.
But ignorance is a particular strength of peacemakers. They don't want
reasons why it can't happen. Nor do they want to hear that the best kind
of peace with people whose religion tells them that they will go to
heaven if they die while cutting your throat is the heavily armed peace
of cold iron and steel.
War is their peace and ignorance is their strength.
No comments:
Post a Comment