Sultan Knish
The one question I invariably encounter in a conservative movement that
tends toward the gray side is how to engage the youth. And the answer is
usually nothing that the questioners want to hear.
Now the Republican Party has laid the corpse of the last election on the
slab and come up with the expected answers. Some of them are correct,
albeit belated. Many others are the sorts of things that the squishy
side of the party has been recommending for a while.
The Republican Party has gone from denying that there is a culture war
to conceding defeat in the culture war while denying that it ever
existed. Its program now is to push aside the socially conservative
material and stop frightening off minorities. And that misses the whole
point about everything.
The right has its racist elements like the left, but its weakness with
minority groups has nothing to do with what the Republican Party is, but
with what the Democratic Party says it is. The GOP is taking on
responsibility for the things that it never did. That is a bad idea on
the best of occasions, but a terrible idea since it only reinforces the
exact same image that has attached to it.
The Republican Party doesn't poll poorly with minorities because its
party members wear hoods and jump out of cars in minority neighborhoods
while shouting "Boo". It polls poorly with minorities because the
Democratic Party has built up an extensive infrastructure in minority
communities, backed by a national and local media presence.
George W. Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney were not racists, but if you
listen to the media and have no opinion of your own, you might get that
impression. And if you're a member of a group that experiences racism
and your community leaders and role models tell you that they are
racist, then you have excellent odds of believing it.
Clarence Thomas, Herman Cain or Ben Carson are not going to
fundamentally change that because the problem is not really in the
Republican Party. The problem is that the other side has an extensive
investment in depicting Republicans as racist and it controls much of
the media and academia. Its figureheads also happen to be highly
influential in those communities being targeted.
The only way to counter that is to build up an actual working presence
in these communities, focused on their middle class and their small
businesses, finding common cause where it's possible, and doing
something to build up rival community leaders.
And this isn't only true of minorities. Plenty of white communities are
in the same boat. They can occasionally be won over, but they have been
structurally indoctrinated and organized into seeing the Republican
Party as the enemy. That isn't going to change because the Republican
Party goes out of its way to announce that it is now friendly.
A non-retarded Republican Party would have spent the Bush Administration
seeing that all that money from Washington D.C. is going to friendly
organizations, rather than unfriendly ones. The Democratic Party has
spent decades doing just that. But that is very doubtfully the GOP plan.
Instead perhaps there will be a series of LDS-style ads featuring
minorities who announce proudly, "I am Black and a Republican." And
someone will make a lot of RNC money proposing that idea.
That naturally brings us to the youth. A sizable number of them do
believe in gay marriage, abortion and a cradle to the grave nanny state
complete with free contraception and abortion for all. But for various
reasons the Grand Old Party has decided to bend on gay marriage in the
hopes of winning over the kids.
Romney didn't actually lose the white youth vote and going for gay
marriage will likely alienate young religious voters while failing to
attract nearly enough socially liberal/fiscally conservative voters to
make up the difference. Not unless Rand Paul is on the ticket and
probably not even then. But the GOP still isn't thinking with its head.
And like Rob Portman, it's driven as much by personal concerns as by
political ones.
The answer that I give when asked about the youth, that no one really
wants to hear, is that in many cases they aren't 'gettable'. That
doesn't mean that they are permanently off-limits, but that with delayed
employment opportunities and delayed maturity, it will take time until
they actually share conservative economic and social concerns. That's
not true across the board, but it is true of the very voters that the
Grand Old Party wants to get its hands on.
Shifting on gay marriage will not make a difference. It will only
reinforce the image of the GOP as a dated party that lags behind the
Democratic Party's initiatives. And gay marriage does not exist as an
individual cause. It is part of a constellation of social causes
representing progressive social mores. The idea that gay marriage is a
stopping point is laughable. There is no stopping point. That is the
whole point.
The left is not interested in gay marriage because it believes in
marriage, but because it believes in destroying all existing social
institutions. A Republican Party that fails to grasp that has no clue
where it is or what it's fighting. It might as well be sent blindfolded
into the ring with Muhammad Ali. And that is indeed what has been
largely going on. The Republican Party has capitalized on populist
backlashes to the left's culture war without really understanding them
or believing in them.
The Republican Party can go fiscally conservative and socially liberal
and the joke will be on it, because a socially liberal society of broken
families and absent values is naturally dependent on the Nanny State.
Trying to be fiscal conservatives in a socially liberal society makes as
much sense as trying to sell burnt Korans to Mecca.
A socially conservative society can be naturally fiscally conservative,
but a socially liberal society is going to reserve its patches of fiscal
conservatism for the upper classes. A socially liberal and fiscally
conservative party will revisit the old broken Eastern Establishment GOP
with a veneer of radicalism that will quickly rub off once the
Democratic Party takes its proposals and runs with them.
That brings us back to the youth. If we are to believe the brilliant
rebranders of the GOP, then the youth have naturally socially "advanced"
on gay marriage. That is of course utter nonsense. The advance has been
carefully engineered by the left for its own reasons using popular
entertainment and the education system, among other methods. The same
process that branded the Republican Party racist led to this amazing
social revolution in believing what you see on television to be true.
Gay marriage exists as part of a set of progressive social values. To
accept it, you have to accept everything that comes with it... or a year
from now you'll be right where you were before you accepted it. And
the people moving the agenda forward are not your friends. The places
that they are moving the agenda are meant to stagger you and bewilder
you. To make you feel like you are losing your own country.
The natural advance theory is a myth. And trying to keep pace with these
'advances' is hopeless because they are managed culture war strikes,
not some external process naturally progressing at its own pace.
The same problem exists with the youth vote as with the minority vote.
We are not up against a cultural or social misunderstanding, but a
deliberate program that has been developing for over a century and that
is backed by heavy investment in role models, in entertainment and in
ideas. We have not alienated them. They have been alienated from us. The
distinction is an important one because it means that we are not in
control of the process.
Trying to win by evolving is a lost cause. Trying to repackage
conservatism as socially liberal ignores the most basic elements of
human psychology and the entire process of youthful rebellion that
feeds radicalism. All that's left is to get rid of conservatism, rename
the Republican Party the Freedom Party that now stands for everything
the Democratic Party stands for except higher taxes and big government
and wait for the laughter.
The Republican Party isn't competing with issues. It's competing with
schools and comedians. It's competing with the entire messaging
apparatus of the left which is extensive, elaborate and pervasive.
Imagining that the conservative position will get equal time with their
professors and Family Guy because of a shift on gay marriage is the most
deluded idea ever. The problem isn't gay marriage, it's the apparatus
that's the problem.
Imagine a Republican candidate trying to adopt his liberal opponent's
positions in a debate with a one-hour delay. That is how ridiculous the
GOP is being. And its leaders should not doubt that even a crowd of
voters which gets sizable chunks of its politics from its entertainment
will only sneer at them for their hopelessly uncool efforts at trying to
fit in.
The GOP leadership wants a quick fix solution. How to Get Minority
Voters and Young Voters in 4 Easy Steps. There is no such solution.
The left did not get to where it is with quick fix solutions. It thought
in the long term and it acted in the long term. And while we may lack
the time and the committed manpower to replicate its tactics, it's
absurdly silly to think that its cultural advantages, which include,
among other things, control of the education system and your television
set, can be negated by turning on a few positions.
This is a war of values. Whatever your beliefs about marriage or any
other subject may be, every political struggle is about what we believe
about society at large. It is about what we believe other people should
believe. The man who believes in the least amount of government
imaginable still needs a society that agrees with him and is willing to
implement that kind of system or it all comes to nothing.
We are in the middle of a culture war. That doesn't mean our leaders
should go around shouting that to the skies, but they should understand
what it means. This is not really a struggle over ObamaCare or gay
marriage or whether money should be pumped into green energy,
agricultural subsidies or foreign aid to Pakistan. It's a battle over
what kind of society we should have and what its people should believe
and not believe.
You don't win a culture war by opting out. You don't win it by
surrendering on most of the points. And you don't win it by pretending
it isn't there. If you fail to make an argument, then you lose by
default. And then when the polls catch up with you, you chalk up that
failure to changing mores and count yourself clever for catching up to
the bandwagon of your enemies and then fighting a last stand on the next
issue of the day for as long as the polls say that you should.
This is not simply about government. This is about the kind of society
that we want to have and the kind of people that we want to be. This
isn't about enforcing morality, but it is about recognizing that if we
don't have a system of values that we put forward, then we will
automatically lose to those who do. And their system of values will have
very little room for freedom of speech or any other kind of freedom.
Some people vote for parties, swapping them out like yesterday's
laundry. These are the independent voters. Others vote their values and
that is as true in Portland as it is in Salt Lake City. Most vote their
culture. That tribal sense of where they belong. It is why Jewish
support for the Democratic Party is so hard to shake. It is why social
conservatives keep voting Republican even when they see little out of
it.
If the Republican Party ever starts understanding where its voters are
coming from and where the people who aren't its voters are coming, and
the entire process that has been tearing apart the country for
generations then it might have a shot. But that's not a quick fix. It's
not an easy answer. It can't be solved with an online ad campaign full
of videos meant to go viral, but not in the way that the people making
them think that they will.
The GOP used to understand the culture war, now it doesn't. It would
like a unilateral detente. It would like to opt out and just focus on
economic reform. And that plan has as good a chance of succeeding as
interrupting an exchange of shelling in WW1 to ask if this whole thing
can't be settled with a spirited debate. It doesn't work that way.
The real problem is not just that the Republican Party is still
shell-shocked from its defeat, but that it has learned very little from
that defeat. Despite being beaten by a coalition, it has no real plan
for assembling its own coalition. It doesn't really understand its base
or the other side's base and it is thinking in urban liberal terms about
the future of a conservative party.
No comments:
Post a Comment