On
the issues about which the world is obsessed, Israel’s new government
is basically a continuation of the old one. That is the key point to
keep in mind regarding the new coalition which has a comfortable 68-seat
majority, well over the 61 minimum
parliamentarians required.
Basically,
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in a strong position as these
things go. It is notable that there is not a single other person
seriously considered to be a serious candidate for prime minister. Of
course, he will have the usual headaches of managing a disparate
coalition in which parties will quarrel, threaten to walk out, and make
special demands.
The
coalition consists of Netanyahu’s Likud; Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid party,
which might be called traditionally liberal in American terms; Naftali
Bennett’s right-wing and dati religious (Modern Orthodox, in American
terms, Habayit Hayahudi; Tsipi Livni’s rather shapeless Hatnuah party;
and Shaul Mufaz’s tiny Kadima party. A key element of this coalition is
the alliance of Bennett and Lapid in opposition to the Haredi
(mistakenly called “ultra-Orthodox” in the West) religious parties.
Of
the three key ministries, Netanyahu will be foreign minister, holding
that post “in trust” for indicted
former foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman, whose old party ran on a
joint list with the Likud. In practice, this means Netanyahu will have
close control over implementing his policies internationally. The
defense minister is the very able Moshe Yaalon, a Likud member and
former head of military intelligence.
Lapid
will run the Finance Ministry, dealing with issues on which he has no
experience at all. This is not so unusual in parliamentary systems,
where senior civil servants actually run the ministries. But Lapid holds
this post because his signature issues are to urge reforms in the
economy. His party will also get education, social services,
health, and science and technology.
Here
is something of a paradox. Israel has been one of the most successful
countries in the developed world because it has refused to join the
high-spending, high-debt, subsidy-oriented policies of Europe and now
the United States. Unemployment and inflation has been low; growth has
been relatively high. The problem, though, is that prices are also
relatively high compared to incomes, causing problems especially for
young people and consumers generally.
Lapid
is expected to revise the management of the golden eggs without doing
harm to the goose that laid them. Arguably, the number-one issue for
this government is whether Lapid can perform well. His father, a popular
journalist, followed the precise same course as the son a few years ago
and failed completely. The junior Lapid has no actual political
experience and does have characteristics of Tel Aviv beautiful people
society. If he falters, his party will disintegrate in the next
election.
As
for Bennett, the
amusing spin on much coverage is that his party has succeeded, that
settlers even dominate the government, because he will have a couple of
minor ministries which don't have much power. Actually, he got less than
I would have expected. While the settlements might benefit a little
economically from these positions--and from the party's holding the
chairmanship over the Knesset finance committee--they will not have much
authority and control little money directly.
If
there is a big winner in the new government it is Lapid's reformist
liberals (in the old American sense, not the redefinition imposed on
that word by the American far left). They are going to
have a chance to show if they can improve social services, a fairer
distribution of resources (the issue isn't so much between rich and poor
but across different sectors), and an economy that retains its growth
while managing the problem of high prices, among other things.
Meanwhile,
although the world is obsessed with non-existent issues regarding the
long-dead “peace process” or fantasy options for Israel to make friends
with neighboring Islamist regimes by giving even more concessions,
Israel strategically is focused on defense.
Four
of the six bordering entities—Egypt, the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, and soon
Syria—are ruled by radical Islamist groups that openly declare their
goal of wiping Israel off the map. And that list doesn’t even include
extremely hostile Iran (whose drive toward nuclear weapons cannot be
forgotten for a moment) and the virulently anti-Israel regime in Turkey.
The
fifth neighbor, the Palestinian Authority (PA) is totally uninterested
in negotiating toward peace. Its
strategy revolves around trying to establish unilateral independence
based on the UN General Assembly, which lightly bestowed on it the
status of non-member state. Only Jordan, among the neighbors, can be
deemed to be friendly when it counts, given the monarchy’s own
interests.
This
looks like a rather grim strategic situation and it is one generally
disregarded by the West. Yet Israel has maneuvering room:
--Prospects for a third intifada (guerrilla-terrorist war) in the PA has dissipated for the moment.
--A
quarrel between Hamas and the Cairo regime, which rules the Gaza Strip
and has played too many games allowing revolutionary Islamists to attack
Egypt in the Sinai, has cut off arms and reduced political support for
Hamas.
--In Lebanon, Hizballah has to cope with the loss of its patron, Syria.
--And the PA’s diplomatic strategy is fruitless, incapable of bringing about change.
--Finally,
the Sunni-Shia clash among contending Islamists and the consolidation
of power by Islamist regimes at home are also factors making Israel’s
situation easier.
We need your support. To make a tax-deductible donation to the GLORIA Center by PayPal or credit card: click Donate button: http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com. Checks: "American Friends of IDC.” “For GLORIA Center” on memo line. Mail: American Friends of IDC, 116 East 16th St., 11th Fl., NY, NY 10003.
Please be subscriber 32,186 (among about 50,000 total readers). Put email address in upper right-hand box: http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com
------------------------
The
glib idea that the situation is “unsustainable” is no truer than it has
been for most of the past 65 years. Aside from the momentous decision
on whether to attack Iranian nuclear facilities—something that won’t be a
serious prospect in the next year—the Netanyahu government doesn’t have
many big decisions on foreign policy.
And
if Bennett’s presence protects the Israel settlements on the West Bank,
the absence of any serious “peace process” means that this will be an
easy task, except for some potentially nasty skirmishes over funding. So
desperate is the effort to portray Bennett as the winner that even the
coalition agreement's not talking about the peace process is claimed as
evidence. Obviously, if anything had actually been written to limit
Netanyahu's autonomy on the issue, one could make the case far better.
Bennett's failure to get assurances on that point is hardly a sign of
victory for him. Quite the opposite.
As
this analysis indicates, the main battles will be over budget,
economic, and social issues. In particular, Bennett and Lapid are
committed to reduce Haredi benefits. Note that this isn’t an
“anti-religious” issue because Bennett’s party is largely religious.
While the most visible issue is army service, Haredi housing and child
benefits might be more likely areas for change.
Indeed,
perhaps the most interesting cabinet appointment is that of Rabbi Shay
Piron, from Lapid’s party, as education minister. In the past, such a
selection would have caused a firestorm of protest among secular
Israelis. But Piron is a liberal rabbi and will likely spend more time
trying to modernize religious education than to affect the secular
aspects of teaching.
The
problem of this government is more likely to be one of personalities,
marginal issues that get blown up in importance, and jockeying for
financial benefits for different constituencies. There will be a lot of
fireworks but far fewer explosions. And if any coalition party wants to
test Netanyahu's power at the polls before the government's
four-year-long term ends, they know that he will win the prime
ministership again.
Professor Barry Rubin, Director, Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center http://www.gloria-center.org
The Rubin Report blog http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/
He is a featured columnist at PJM http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/.
Editor, Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal http://www.gloria-center.org
Editor Turkish Studies,http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713636933%22
No comments:
Post a Comment