Prof. Paul Eidelberg
No
one should be surprised, let alone shocked, by the scandalous and
illicit behavior of various members of the Obama Administration. Nor
should anyone be amazed by the laxity and irresponsibility of this
Administration: its fostering the penetration of various government
agencies by Muslims, including members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Spreading throughout the Middle East, the long-known goal of that
terrorist organization is the subversion of the United States to
facilitate the global ascendancy of Islam.
Only
fools and useful idiots fail to see that the name of the game, which
was evident even before 9/11, is not international terrorism but
theologically animated ISLAM. This is the Islam of the Quran and the Hadith and
not any euphemistic or abbreviated version of Islam. It is the Islam of
Muhammad, now armed by the technique of twentieth-century propaganda
and Internet and approaching the nuclear threshold this is the name of America’s enemy.
And
if this were not enough, today Islam has the support of no less than
the President of the United States, whose Muslim outreach policy leaves
no doubt about the subversion now taking place in America.
Nothing
less should be expected given two obvious facts: Mr. Obama is a
post-American president not only animated by the doctrine of moral
relativism propagated by all levels of American education, but he is
also a self-professed Muslim who has publicly and unabashedly exalted n
his words the “Holy Quran,” a creed that exemplifies absolutism!
The contradiction is dissolved by Islam itself, by its military concept of taqiyya,
the art of dissimulation. As Professor Y. Harkabi, a former director of
Israel military intelligence has indicated, mendacity is "second
nature" to Muslims. This mendacity is concealed by another eastern
talent, the art of ingratiation. Arabs excel in this art.
A
sociologist of Arab birth notes that the Arab changes his identity with
little reluctance. With Asians he is oriental, with people from the
West he is occidental, with the old societies he is a traditional man,
with the new a modern.[1]
An
American journalist observed that Egyptian President Abdel Nasser was
an engaging man to meet. He was equally endowed with natural charm and
cunning, and he used his charm advantageously. His visitors were
immediately at their ease. He was the incorruptible puritan
revolutionary who never lost the simplicity of his tastes or the
naturalness of his manners; the autocrat who disliked elaborate
formalities and used the relaxed approach of democracy.[2] .
Secretary
of State William Rogers experienced the same ingratiation in his
meeting with Nasser’s successor Anwar Sadat. As Rogers was later to say
of his meeting with Sadat: “We felt at ease in each other’s company.”
No wonder: Sadat constantly referred to Rogers, whom he had met for the
first time, as Bill. When Kissinger replaced Rogers, he became “dear
Henry” just as quickly. The American media hailed Sadat as a man of
peace. Forgotten was his cunningly planned attack on Israel in the Yom
Kippur War.
But thanks to his mastery of taqiyya,
the avuncular pipe-smoking Sadat conned Washington as well as Jerusalem
and recovered the Sinai without firing a single shot.[3] ?
One
last word: Since Barack Hussein Obama was raised as a Muslim, who to
this day exalts the “Holy Quran,” did his preceptors produce in this
rather mysterious man another master of taqiyya?
[1] Gil Carl AlRoy, Behind the Middle East Conflict (New York: Capricorn Books, 1975), 107.
[2] Ibid., 108.
[3] See Paul Eidelberg, Sadat?s Strategy (Montreal: Dawn Publications, 1979), Ch. 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment