Sultan Knish
The end of free speech will not necessarily come when there are soldiers
in the streets, secret police in the alleyways and a mustachioed man
screaming at you on a television set that can't be turned off no matter
how hard you turn the knob or click the buttons.
Some
of these things certainly existed in totalitarian countries. But they
were there to sweep up the hardened dissenters who refused to be
silenced. The vast majority of citizens did not have bugged phones or
men in trench-coats following them around.
That was what their friends and neighbors were for.
The
first line of offense by a totalitarian society against freedom of
speech is crowdsourced to the people in the streets. It begins with the
imposition of a social norm, escalates to punishments for violating that
norm and concludes with gulags and firing squads.
No secret
police force is large enough to spy on everyone all the time. Nor does
it need to. That is what informers are for. Some of the informers are
committed fanatics. Others do it because they accept whatever they are
told. And the worst do it for the pleasure of destroying someone else
using the power of the law.
Whatever their varying motives,
ideology or malice, such people become even more dangerous in groups
where they become a morality mob.
The Two Minutes Hate in George
Orwell's 1984 is repeated on a regular basis in our society today with
hysterical lynchings like those of of Justine Sacco; one of a long list
of disposable victims of opportunity. The Two Minutes Hate was a
Pavlovian exercise to stimulate the hate reflex. Modern counterparts
like #hasjustinelandedyet with its overt malice are the genuine thing.
The
process by which these ugly events happen has a good deal in common
with any other form of mob violence. There are familiar elements from
Shirley Jackson's disturbing story, "The Lottery". There is a ritual
aspect to the whole thing. The crowd knows what is coming. Like many
rapists and murderers, it derives pleasure from a victim who does not
yet know what is about to happen and eagerly anticipates the moment of
shocked revelation when that will change.
"When is Justine
landing?" they whisper eagerly to each other. Sadism is no good if the
victim doesn't know what is being done to her. The anticipation sharpens
their appetite for the revelation.
Behind it all is a moral
structure. The crowd in the Two Minutes Hate does not randomly lash out.
The very name with its time limit is a demonstration of civilization.
For two minutes they will become hateful animals in reaction to a
profound ideological offense. And then they will turn the outrage
machine off.
Anyone can be a mob, but they are a morality mob.
They do horrible things because the ends, such as fighting racism,
justify the means. They hate for two minutes and then go back to their
daily lives.
Structure maintains the illusion of morality. Like
The Lottery, it has to pretend that it isn't random so that the
participants can make believe that they are doing this for some nobler
reason than the primal joy of bashing another human being's head in with
a rock.
Modern social media is The Lottery. You type things into
it. You type them in when you're sober or drunk. When you're on top of
the world or miserably depressed. You tweet and get retweeted. You like
and are liked in turn. The sentiments you express move beyond your close
circles of family and friends.
Sometimes
you win the lottery and become famous. Your Twitter feed gets turned
into a CBS sitcom. Other times you lose the lottery and your equally
stupid tweet gets you picked to be stoned to death.
Each time you
participate in the global mass of the internet, you are pulling a
ticket out of the lottery. And even if you don't participate, a crazy
lesbian waitress can tell the world that you refused to give her a tip, a
former friend or lover can make your letter, stripped of context, go
viral and what passes for reporters in the new media looking for
pageviews can make you a target to fill a daily quota.
The
Internet is going crazy for, the headlines on the same sites that create
the frenzy say. The Internet is exploding. The Internet lashed out. The
Internet lynched someone. But it's not the internet. It's the cowardly
individuals in the morality mob hiding behind their collective malice in
a hashtag who want to hurt someone from the physical and moral safety
of the mob.
The morality mob is attracted to pettiness. It
rarely takes on big things because it knows its own weakness. A morality
mob is a bully without the courage and it needs easy targets that it
knows it can hurt. It attacks individuals for minor social offenses. It
targets them for perceived sins against their social consensus, but it
is truly animated by the perception that its targets violate these norms
because they are elitist, because they view themselves as special and
above the rules that apply to everyone.
The modern internet
morality mob began in China. A country that is not only Communist, but a
place where sticking your head out is its own crime. The Chinese
version of the Ugly Duckling story doesn't end with the duckling turning
into a swan, but being eaten because he was only a foolish duck who had
the ridiculous idea that he was a swan.
"It was just the latest
example of a growing phenomenon the Chinese call Internet hunting, in
which morality lessons are administered by online throngs and where
anonymous Web users come together to investigate others and mete out
punishment for offenses real and imagined." That is how the New York Times described it in 2006.
The
phenomenon has since spread to America, but it predictably enough began
in a collectivist society ruled by the iron hand of the Communist
Party.
Totalitarianism relies on harnessing the darker
emotions in the human catalog; fear, sadism, hate, contempt and the
sense of power that derives from causing harm to another beneath the
mask of the self-righteous inquistioner whose moral authority allows him
to both inflict and enjoy the torment.
Beneath these responses
is a deeper sense of helplessness and insecurity. The anonymous mass of
society has become even more chokingly cramped and anonymous on the
internet than in the biggest twentieth century cities. For some of the
uglier faces in the crowd, the only way to feel real is to hurt someone.
And their leftist ringleaders know exactly how the game is played.
The
morality mobs on the internet are mostly of the left. That is because
the left is better at organization and rhetoric. It also holds the
commanding heights of social morality dictating what behaviors are
acceptable and which are not.
Morality mobs crowdsource the
left's values enforcement. While its activist groups concern themselves
with Phil Robertson, its morality mobs band together to target ordinary
people. The organized left can make examples out of famous people while
the ad-hoc left can make examples out of ordinary people by making their
morality mob lynchings go viral.
The
left responded to criticism of its actions in the Phil Robertson case
by arguing that they are not violating the First Amendment. And they
aren't. Directly. Though indirectly their entire culture of activism and
the promotion of their values is funded by the government. But free
speech can be structurally suppressed without ever officially involving
the authorities in the dirty work.
If the outcome is the end of
free speech, then the details of how it got that way become academic. If
instead of a top-down solution, the actual death of free speech
involves a mid-level intervention by an oligarchy of media and new media
outlets, activist groups and fearful businesses banding together to
make free speech impossible while the authorities go on smiling and
insisting that speech is still free; then the destination is the same.
Only the road we took to get there will have changed.
The First
Amendment was not just a legal safeguard against government abuses, but a
statement that an open society is best. The letter of the law protects
the people from government intervention, but the spirit of the law is an
argument for an open society in which the freedom to worship, to speak
and to protest against the government make all our freedoms possible.
The
left aspires to a society in which dissent is suppressed. And a society
without dissent is totalitarian whether it is ruled by the hateful mob
of the Two Minutes Hate or by Big Brother.
No comments:
Post a Comment