Gideon Israel
The recent breakdown in the
Israeli-Palestinian negotiations and its apparent implications
distorts the day to day reality in Israel. Furthermore, the comments
made by John Kerry paint a bleak picture of a country on the verge of
becoming a pariah in the international community, or at the least
indicate that it would be fair for Israel to be treated that way. While
many are predisposed regarding the prospects of the peace process and
who is at fault for the most recent breakdown, for those seeking the
truth, it is of utmost importance to understand the reality on the
ground. If we can move past the ambiguous phraseology and political
rhetoric used by the United States and the international
community concerning the “peace process” and lamenting its
deterioration, we can begin to understand a less harsher reality, whose
implications are far from the ominous remarks that John Kerry has made
recently and in the past.
Since 1993, the Israelis and Palestinians have been involved in a
“peace process,” which might imply that the sides are at each other’s
throat and incessantly fighting. Furthermore, it would indicate that
this “peace process” is the only way to bring an end to the incessant
fighting and bloodshed. However, nothing could be further from the
truth.
The reality is that Israel, not only as a country, but as individual
citizens, lives at peace with the Palestinians. Hard to believe – but
it’s true. Since 1947, when Israel accepted the U.N. Partition Plan,
which gave them sovereignty over a crumb of land, Israel has
continuously reached out to the Arabs for peace, only to be met with a
just as continuous chant of no, no, no.
Palestinians, or any Arabs for that matter, are able to travel
anywhere in Israel without feeling threatened. From Judea and Samaria
to Tel Aviv, Jerusalem to Eilat, Arabs don’t have to worry that someone
will threaten them simply because they are an Arab. They might raise
suspicion, and hence be checked, but that is to merely determine that
they have no terrorist intentions. This is certainly understandable in a
country where at anytime, ordinary civilians could be on the receiving
end of a bus blowing up or a suicide bomber in restaurant.
Many Arabs know that Israelis are a very sympathetic and kind
people. It is not unusual to hear of stories where soldiers, or
Israelis living in Judea and Samaria (AKA West Bank) help out
Arabs in need, whether it be a woman who needs to give birth, a sick
person or any other situation where an Arab could not find the help they
need from their local community. Even at various checkpoints,
Palestinians know that they can play on the sympathies of IDF soldiers
in hoping to be let through. When the Palestinian terrorism was at its
height in the first decade of the 21st century, Palestinian
ambulances had replaced local taxis for transportation through
checkpoints since Israel would always permit ambulances to be allowed
through checkpoints because of its sensitivity to the sick, even though
most of the passengers in the ambulances were not sick ( I was a soldier
there and saw this firsthand).
Palestinians with work permits are hired and work for various Israeli
companies in pre-1967 Israel, and many other Palestinians work for
Israeli companies at various industrial parks throughout Judea and
Samaria (Barkan, Mishor Adumim). It is well known that many Arabs and
Palestinians work for the Supermarket chain Rami Levi.
Despite all of the rhetoric, there is no Israeli group, either on the
political left or the political right who advocates violence against
the Palestinians simply because they are Palestinians. While some
groups may propose harsh responses to Palestinian terrorism, initiating
violence against the Palestinians is virtually unheard of in Israel.
While there have been some incidents of violence, the perpetrators are
immediately condemned by all as radicals who have absolutely no
political representation or social support for their acts. Even those
‘radicals’ who propose removing Palestinians from Israel, openly
proclaim that the only way to do so is by offering them economic
incentives to live elsewhere.
Israel teaches tolerance in its schools, accommodates Arabs at
government offices recognizing it as one of the languages of the
country, has organizations that collect charity for poor Arabs, treats
patients from Gaza, the Palestinian controlled territories in Judea and
Samaria, and from a variety of other Arab countries in the Middle East
at its hospital and medical clinics – specifically those in need of
unique medical treatments that are not available in their home
countries.
Israel’s media even gives the Palestinians a platform to present
their anti-Israel views. I recall a newscast during Operation Cast Lead
where following an interview with Homeland Security Minister,
Avi Dichter, who stated that Hamas was hiding militants in Shifa
hospital, a Palestinian doctor was interviewed and claimed that
Dichter’s comments were nonsense.
If a peace agreement were signed tomorrow, the Israeli people would
not have to undergo any societal change, because we have been at peace
with Palestinians and Arabs for many years now – we were merely waiting
for them to let us know that they have truthfully given up their goal of
destroying Israel and the Jewish people.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said regarding the Palestinian
political leadership or the general populace. No sane Israeli would
travel to any of the Palestinian controlled cities. Not only is it
forbidden by Israeli law, but it is a possible death wish. The reason
Israel forbids its citizens to enter Palestinian controlled areas is
that the IDF knows that there is good chance that an Israeli travelling
in a West Bank city will most likely need to be rescued by an army
operation. Even travelling through certain Arab villages in pre-1967
Israel can be a dangerous undertaking for a non-Arab.
While some Palestinians might be ambivalent, or even friendly toward
Israelis, lynching incidents, including the brutal lynch and disfiguring
of two Israeli reserve soldiers by a Palestinian mob
in Ramallah in October, 2000, indicates that the general populace is at
least quietly supportive, if not openly supportive, of such acts. The
only counter argument to this would be to say that the Palestinians are
afraid to speak against these acts for fear of retribution by the
government or terrorist groups (this could include being accused of
treason, placed in front of a firing squad and then being taken for a
complimentary tour of the city tied to the back of a car), which is
certainly a good reminder to Israelis (and the international community)
as to the type of people sitting opposite them at the negotiating table.
Most Israelis would not knowingly ask Palestinians or Arabs for help,
unless the situation is so extremely dire, and even then, would only be
done hesitantly as a last resort. Israelis whether in Jerusalem, Tel
Aviv, or Judea and Samaria, are always on guard if there is an Arab
walking behind them or milling around in the area; not because they
don’t like him, but because they have no idea if he may be a terrorist.
Israelis will not frequent parks at night where there is a significant
Arab population that also frequents these parks for fear of a possible
attack.
Israelis would never possibly consider going to an Arab medical
center for fear of leaving dead – and not because of natural causes.
The Palestinian schools teach incitement against the Israelis in their textbooks.
Their textbooks and maps do not even mention Israel’s existence.
Palestinian and Arab media continually incite violence against Israel –
from political talk shows to children’s programs
all advocate jihad against Israel. The incitement is so venomous and
on such a large scale – yet ignored by the West and others in a fantasy
world - that there is a website called Palestinian Media Watch
dedicated to monitoring it.
Israelis do not work for Palestinian companies because 1) they can’t
travel to Palestinian controlled cities; 2) they wouldn’t be hired
anyway; and 3) even if hired they would always be taking the risk of
being killed on the job. Furthermore, PA chairman Abu Mazen has
repeatedly said that no Israelis will be allowed to live in a
Palestinian state.
Palestinian leaders have not made any goodwill gestures to Israel or
ever said anything positive about Israel itself, despite sending ill
family members to hospitals in Israel for treatment. Palestinian
leaders continue to spread lies throughout the international community
about Israel and Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians.
Direct negotiations between the Israeli and Palestinian leadership
have temporarily ceased, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be peace or
co-existence. Israel and its citizens will continue to work to improve
the lives of Palestinians living in Judea and Samaria, even though the
official Palestinian Authority policy continues to be the total
destruction of Israel. The Palestinian Authority will continue beating
the drums of war, violence, and delegitimizing Israel in the
international community. Their incessant media incitement will provoke
terrorist attacks, and thus exact an Israeli military response, which
undoubtedly will be widely condemned in the international community.
Inevitably, the Palestinians will return to the peace process and
direct negotiations since it has been expedient for them, as sitting at
the table keeps the western money faucet running. When they do return,
let us call the process by a name that will better reflect the reality
on the ground and what is necessary for a real settlement: The process
of Palestinian rehabilitation from hate and destructive behavior
syndrome.
Gideon Israel is a research analyst for Sohlberg Consulting and the author of a comprehensive policy paper on the US aid to Israel. In the past, he has worked on projects with former Israeli Government Minister, Benny Elon, on issues such as UNRWA, Palestinian refugees, and int’l law in Judea and Samaria (West Bank).
No comments:
Post a Comment