Doc's Talk: PROOF OF IMMINENT BETRAYAL

Monday, October 01, 2007

PROOF OF IMMINENT BETRAYAL

Emanuel A. Winston
Mid East Analyst & Commentator

Even the most naive among us knows that when politicians assure the public that they are "not up to no good", that’s the time to hide the silverware
The White House is responding to a growing ground swell of objections to its coming November International "Peace Conference". This calls together most, if not all, of Israel’s dedicated armies to discuss what Israel must give up for that illusory word: "Peace".

The White House is clearly getting nervous if it is now vomiting up assurances that "nothing conclusive will be done at this gathering". There is nothing as frightening as when diplomats and politicians give out sincere promises to the public. It is a sure sign that they are going to gang up on someone, be it a nation or a person, for an old fashioned lynching.

Israel is to be the designated victim and the hanging mob will be led by President George W. Bush, Secretary Condoleezza Rice and former Secretary James Baker III, within the pro-Arab U.S. State Department’s usual agenda. Other bar-room thugs officiating will be the rest of the so-called "quartet", including the U.N., E.U., Russia, the Arab League, Egypt and (if they agree to come to the lynching...Saudi Arabia).

The idea is to pacify all of us so we won’t swamp the pro-Israel American Congress with demands for their presence and protests. They also do not want protesters anywhere near the site of the meeting so it has to take place at a center where the public can be held far away - like Camp David, or Wye, or Crawford, Texas or somewhere that the Military, Police and/or National Guard can block any democratic challenge to a government policy intended to disassemble the Jewish State of Israel.
After all, a public lynching is not what the Bush Administration wants before national elections. Also the Europeans do not want to be seen again arranging for a Jewish Genocide as they participated in during WWII.

The propaganda machines in the bowels of Foggy Bottom (the U.S. State Department) and the White House are burning the midnight oil drafting news releases that speak about the Grand Peace Israel will receive from Syria, Hezb’Allah, Hamas, Fatah, PFLP, the Muslim Brotherhood and all those Arab nations with Charters that call for the absolute destruction of the so-called "infidel" Jewish entity - as mandated in the Koran.

In Israel, Olmert has tasked the Leftist Media to assure the people that he will consult with his Cabinet and the Knesset before he "implements" the "Declaration of Principles" which he has already committed to in writing with Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen). Abbas released the "secret" document to the Media and Olmert promptly denied its existence That "Declaration of Principles" lists the Israeli Land, given by G-d to the Jewish people, which Olmert has stated he will surrender to the Muslim Arabs: In addition to Gaza (which as predicted has become a Global Terror Kassam Rocket launching base), Judea, Samaria, the Jordan Valley, the Golan Heights and all those parts of Jerusalem which was occupied and desecrated by Jordan for 19 years from 1948 to 1967. Those territories of Israel’s ancestral heartland also include 2/3rds of Israel’s fresh water resources.

Olmert, to insure that there will no revolt of his Kadima Cabinet, has arranged what can only be called a "Cancellation Committee". Any negative vote taken by his own Kadima Cabinet cannot go into force until it passes a review of this new "Committee of Three" (all of whom happen to be close friends of Olmert). They have arrogated the right to themselves to investigate, consider, ponder what a ‘negative’ vote means. This consideration could go on for months and possibly never conclude their investigation - thereby insuring that the vote would be DOA (Dead On Arrival).
Something like the Winograd investigation of Olmert’s government handling of and losing the War in Lebanon against Hezb’Allah. Winograd, Olmert’s appointed friend and investigator, has essentially banned the investigation and its conclusions by refusing to release its findings. IF the scheme worked with Winograd without interference by the extremely Leftist Israeli Supreme Court, why not do it again with a three-man Commission who will kill any vote not favorable to the Bush-Rice-Baker Plan to divide and de-Judaize what was once the Jewish State?

Rice as the talking head for propaganda is saying things like: "The Implementation of these decisions will be difficult." Take that to mean that she and the lynch mob will push very hard for the agreements to divide Israel into smaller, digestible chunks - hoping everyone will believe that, if she says it’s difficult to implement, it will all take a long time or not happen at all. That’s called "Friendly Persuasion" but, otherwise it’s known as a street lie.

Then they proclaim that they will not be setting up any deadlines which you may read as definitely setting up deadlines. These deadlines which if NOT met will be followed by sanctions such as embargoes, cutting off aid, cutting off military assistance, cutting off contracts, spare parts, fuel supplies, pressuring American Jews with threats that an unhappy Bush Administration will raise the specter of anti-Semitism so they too must pressure Israel to cave in to all demands made during the November lynching.

Some will recall how George Herbert Walker Bush (Father Bush), in a telephone call to the Saudi King, promised that his son George would take care of the King. Well, the Bush lynch mob will more than prove that George will keep that promise in a November surprise.

There is growing concern in the White House that Congress may condemn the idea of dividing Jerusalem and further disassembly of Israel so that President Bush and Secretary C. Rice can leave their offices with a false positive historical legacy of having brought "Peace in our Time to the Muslim/Jewish Conflict".
There is further concern of a growing alarm among Christian Friends of Israel who will lobby Congress and show up ‘en masse’ in Washington at the lynching in November to protest.

It is always possible that the passive Jewish organizations like AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, the UJC (United Jewish Communities) and others will wake up and protest. Jewish leadership has always been an embarrassment when it came to challenging the Arabist State Department in order to defend Israel.
Regrettably, the Republican Party will be tarred with the same brush as Bush-Rice and Baker going into national elections.

I wonder what the candidates running for President, both Democrats and Republicans will say (or avoid saying) before the November lynching? Let’s ask them.
The more they assure us that the gathering of Israel’s enemies to discuss the future existence of the Jewish nation is nothing to be concerned about - the more concerned and active we must be.

Please send this to your Congressional representatives and then call his or her office. Also, please send this analysis to your local papers, talk show and Israel’s Christian friends. Let President Bush and Secretary Condoleezza Rice know how you feel about these plans to betray a friend and ally as their legacy.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk