Doc's Talk: Iran at Forefront of Multi-pronged War against Israel, the West

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Iran at Forefront of Multi-pronged War against Israel, the West

As Iran supplies Gaza-based Hamas increasing quantities of longer-range rockets along with continued funding and training, the Islamic Republic has emerged as the architect of a multi-front war against Israel and Western countries. In addition to Hamas' attacks against Israel from the south, Iran is re-arming its proxy Hezbollah in Lebanon, north of Israel, for future potential strikes against Israel.

In Tehran, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has continued his threats to annihilate Israel and attack the west while continuing to defy the International Atomic Energy Agency and the international community’s orders to halt uranium enrichment [1] that could be used to create a nuclear weapon. Today (March 3), the United Nations Security Council adopted new sanctions against Iran. [2] Ahmadinejad has said he plans to share his nuclear know-how with other like-minded countries. [3]

Said Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, founder and president of The Israel Project, “Iran has said it’s the ‘Number one power in the world’ and now they’re trying to demonstrate that, whether through their interference in Afghanistan; arming Venezuela against Colombia; their outreach in Iraq; or arming, training and funding Hezbollah. Now, by increasing the supply of weapons, funding and training for Palestinian terrorists, Iran is continuing its quest to expand its dangerous influence worldwide. Iran’s president has said he wants Israel ‘wiped off the map’ and there’s no reason to doubt he means it.

“All of this is also a way of distracting the world from the even bigger threat – the potential of Iran with a nuclear weapon,” Mizrahi said. “Today, however, the U.N. Security Council put forth a powerful message that the world wants to resolve this crisis peacefully and constructively so that all of us can have a safer future.”

During the most recent barrage of rocket fire from Gaza, 20 were Grad-type Katyusha rockets imported from Iran. [4]
That amounts to more than three times the number of Grads fired into Israel during the last two years combined. [5] Grads have a longer range than the Qassam rockets that are manufactured in Gaza. [6]

At a cabinet meeting on Sunday, March 2, IDF Chief of Military Intelligence Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin said the recent upsurge in violence began after Israel targeted Hamas operatives who had received training in Iran and were planning a terrorist attack against Israel. [7]

Iran-backed terrorists have shot more than 4,000 rockets at Israel since Israel voluntarily evacuated all of its roughly 9,000 residents from the area two-and-a-half years ago in hopes of paving the way for an independent Palestinian state. Hamas, like Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other groups funded, trained and armed by Iran, fires rockets at Israeli civilians and targets elementary schools from densely populated areas in Gaza, using civilian homes and schools as launching pads [8] and is now openly threatening to attack Israeli children. The use of civilians as human shields violates the Fourth Geneva Convention. [9] [10]

In addition to providing military training and smuggling weapons to Hamas operatives [11] in Gaza through Egypt, [12] Iran provides Hamas $20 million to $30 million annually [13] and pledged an additional $50 million to the Palestinians' Hamas-led government, according to mid-2007 estimates.[14] The Islamic Republic also shared its expertise as the group prepared to take over the Gaza Strip last June. [15]

Iran continuously provides training, weaponry and money to Hezbollah at the rate of $100 million [16] to $200 million [17] annually, according to tallies as of mid-2007. After Hezbollah attacked Israel from Lebanon without provocation in July 2006, enmeshing Israel in a 34-day war, Iran reportedly gave Hezbollah another $300 million. [18] Since the war, Iran has re-armed Hezbollah and provided it greater and more advanced weaponry. [19] Iran’s weapons supplies to the Shiite terror group have included Katyusha rockets, surface-to-air rockets and anti-tank weapons. [20]

In addition to Ahmadinejad’s diatribes against the West, an Iranian group has recruited 40,000 suicide bombers to carry out attacks against Europe and other Western countries. [21] And, according to Ahmadinejad’s apocalyptic doctrine, Iran will lead a war with other Muslim countries against the West to Islamicize the world. [22] [23]

Footnotes

[1] Asculai, Ephraim. “The Latest IAEA Report (22.2.2008) and Iranian Nuclear Weapons Development.” Institute for National Security Studies, Feb. 29, 2008, http://www.inss.org.il/publications.php?cat=21&incat=&read=1656

[2] Charbonneau, Louis, “UN council imposes new sanctions on defiant Iran,” Reuters via Yahoo! News, March 3, 2008, http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080303/wl_nm/iran_nuclear_un_dc

[3] "Iran 'could share nuclear skills,'"offers to arm enemies of Israel with rocket arsenal," BBC News, April 25, 2006, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4943782.stm

[4] Grinberg, Mijal, “MI: 20 Grad-type missiles fired at Israel over course of Gaza op,” Haaretz, March 3, 2008, http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/960262.html

[5] “Rocket threat from the Gaza Strip, 2000-2007,” Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, Dec. 2007, http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/rocket_threat_e.htm

[6] Frenkel, Sheera Claire, “W. Bank will become another Gaza if peace talks stop,” The Jerusalem Post, March 3, 2008, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1204473067282&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

[7] Sofer, Roni, “Intelligence chief: Don't forget Iran, Syria,” Ynetnews, March 2, 2008, http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3513864,00.html

[8] Keinon, Herb, Katz, Yaakov, “‘Hamas smuggled advanced arms,” The Jerusalem Post, Feb. 3, 2008, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1201867287240&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

[9] "Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War," Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 12 August 1949, http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm

[10] Ibid.

[11] Keinon, Herb, Katz, Yaakov, “‘Hamas smuggled advanced arms,” The Jerusalem Post, Feb. 3, 2008, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1201867287240&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull; El Deeb, Sarah, “Haniyeh: Iran Pledges $250M in Aid,” The Associated Press, Dec. 11, 2006, http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2006/12/11/haniyeh_iran_pledges_250m_in_aid/; “Hamas,” Council on Foreign Relations, http://www.cfr.org/publication/8968/, accessed March 3, 2008

[12] Keinon, Herb, Katz, Yaakov, “‘Hamas smuggled advanced arms,” The Jerusalem Post, Feb. 3, 2008, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1201867287240&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull; El Deeb, Sarah, “Haniyeh: Iran Pledges $250M in Aid,” The Associated Press, Dec. 11, 2006, http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2006/12/11/haniyeh_iran_pledges_250m_in_aid/; “Hamas,” Council on Foreign Relations, http://www.cfr.org/publication/8968/, accessed March 3, 2008

[13] Hamas," Council on Foreign Relations Web site, http://www.cfr.org/publication/8968/, accessed July 2, 2007

[14] "Iran pledges $50m Palestinian aid," BBC News, April 16, 2006, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4914334.stm

[15] Rabinovich, Abraham, "Hamas digs in for war in Gaza," The Australian, March 16, 2007

[16] Aversa, Jeannine, "Levey: Iran 'central banker of terror'," Associated Press via Iran Focus, Aug. 28, 2006

[17] Wilson, Scott, "Lebanese Wary of a Rising Hezbollah," The Washington Post, Dec. 20, 2004, A17, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12336-2004Dec19_2.html

[18] Ghattas, Kim, "Regional powers fight over Lebanon," BBCNews, April 27, 2007, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6595909.stm

[19] “One year since the acceptance of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the second Lebanon war: An interim report,” Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, April 12, 2007, http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/un1701_0807.htm

[20] Hughes, Robin, "Iran Replenishes Hizbullah's Arms Inventory," Jane's Defence Weekly, Jan.3, 2007

[21] Karimi, Nasser, "Iran test fires longer range missile," The Guardian via The Associated Press, Nov. 2, 2006, http://www.guardian.co.uk/breakingnews/International/0,,6187658,00.html; Colvin, Marie, Smith, Michael, and Baxter, Sarah, "Iran suicide bombers 'ready to hit Britain,'" The Sunday Times, April 16, 2006, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2136638,00.html

[22] Taheri, Amir, "A Clash of Civilizations," Newsweek International, Sept.5, 2005.

[23] Taheri, Amir, "The frightening truth of why Iran wants a bomb," The Daily Telegraph, April 16, 2006
The Israel Project is an international non-profit organization devoted to educating the press and the public about Israel while promoting security, freedom and peace. The Israel Project provides journalists, leaders and opinion-makers accurate information about Israel. The Israel Project is not related to any government or government agency.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk