Sultan Knish
Good news for those of you who enjoy taking your shoes off in airports.
Al-Qaeda's chief bombmaker, a cheerful fellow named Ibrahim Hassan
al-Asiri, who sent his younger brother off on a suicide bombing mission
with a bomb up his rectum, has been working on turning everything into a
bomb. Cameras, printer cartridges and even pets.
The good news is that al-Asiri isn't very good at it. His bomb did a
good job of killing his brother, but not much else. The original
underwear bomb worn by the Christmas bomber didn't work out. The bad
news is that with enough cannon fodder and enough attempts, sooner or
later al-Asri or another college dropout will get it right. But even if
he doesn't, the force multiplier of the threat alone will do the job.
All it took was one shoe bomber to get us to take off our shoes. A
failed plan to blow up airliners with liquid explosives led to the
liquid ban. In the age of underwear bombs we have naked scanners. What
is going to happen when the next plot involves explosives embedded in a
laptop or surgically implanted in a pet?
A bomb anywhere is a bomb everywhere. When the bombs are everywhere,
then so are the security measures taken against them until life is one
big bomb and one giant security measure.
We may sooner or later hunt down al-Asiri and blow him away, but taking
out a twenty-something graduate of a Saudi university after a long
manhunt at a cost of countless millions of dollars will not be some
grand achievement. There are plenty of Saudi, Kuwaiti and Pakistani
chemistry students who can step into his place.
We are not fighting a war against toothpaste, shoes or underwear. Nor
against bombs. Bombs after all don't make themselves or detonate
themselves. That's what people are for and until we come to grips with
the people making and detonating the bombs, then we will live in a world
of bombs, where every item, no matter how innocuous, is treated as a
potential explosive device, and every person in line as a potential
explosive weapon.
The formula for fighting a War on Terror without defining a vector for
that terror has led to a state of terror, in which everyone is either
terrified or terrorized. The official word is that anyone and everyone
can be a terrorist, and even though they all seem to be Muslim, the
official position is that this is a complete coincidence, a
misunderstanding of the religion of peace or a result of our foreign
policy.
To believe any of these things is to also believe that history is bunk.
Al-Asiri's last name indicates that he comes from the Asir province, the
heartland of fanaticism in Saudi Arabia. Asir means "difficult" in
Arabic. Six of the 9/11 hijackers came from Asir and Bin Laden praised
its tribes as "forming the lion's share". Asir had been a source of
violence and Islamic fanaticism long before American foreign policy
mattered to anyone one outside the hemisphere. The Asiri Wahhabis had
fought the Ottoman Empire in Asir going back to the early 1800's and
then they fought the House of Saud. With global access, Asiris are able
to extend their wars deep into our territory. To launch attacks well
beyond their desert home.
It's not the bomb on the planes that are the problem, it's the planes
themselves and what they carry. It is the transportation links that
relay Muslims out of their lands and into our own. Muslims term their
lands the Dar-al-Islam and our lands, the Dar-al-Harb, the realm of the
sword. But the irony is that it is Islamic lands which are the true
realm of the sword, forever in conflict, Muslim fighting Muslim, while
repressing and enslaving Jews, Christians, Hindus and any other
minorities under Muslim rule.
The sword has given way to the bomb, though it is still used
occasionally on hostages, and by importing Islam we have imported the
way of the sword and the rule of the bomb. When the followers of the
sword take the plane, then sooner or later they will bomb the plane or
use the plane as a guided missile. There is no avoiding that.
The other meaning of "Asir" is prisoner. Without transportation, Muslims
in Asir were imprisoned in their barren unwelcoming land. Given
transportation we have all become their prisoners. Terrorist threats are
enough to turn us into prisoners being herded into lines. While every
courtesy is given to the Sons of Asir, lest we infuriate them further,
the native population is imprisoned by regulations crafted to resist the
attacks of an enemy whose name may not be spoken.
Rather than terrorizing the terrorists, our governments terrorize us.
They make us into the prisoners of an endless terror while they appease
the terrorists. By failing to define a clear enemy, we have all been
made into the enemy.
The raid is as indigenous to Arabia as its sand. As Islam has become
indigenous to America and Europe, the raid is becoming indigenous to
Western nations as well, and no game of 'three monkeys' will change
that. Islam spread by sword and terror, it survived by sword and terror,
and it thrives by sword and terror. The body count of those slain by
Muslim terrorists has translated directly into a quantum increase in
Muslim political influence. The Mohammedan religion, once obscure, is
now at the helm of foreign and domestic policy. Every aspect of
government all the way up to NASA is tasked with winning its followers
over and defusing the ticking time bomb of their violence.
When we finally hunt down Ibrahim al-Asiri somewhere in Yemen, which
once laid claim to Asir and has a history of contending with the House
of Saud, among the tribes who have feuds and grudges as old as the
desert sands, we will be nowhere closer to winning the War on Terror.
Not so long as we have our heads stuck in those same sands.
Demographics alone dictate that there will be more young men to replace
al-Asiri than there will be to replace the American men going off to war
against his cronies. And in a polygamous society, even upper class
young Saudi men are not only replaceable, they are competition for the
harems of the Bin Ladens, the elderly men trying to make their paradise
on earth with the help of Viagra and wealth. Many of these young men
will have university educations and ample encouragement to join the
Jihad to carve out more territory for the Dar-al-Islam.
Some will emigrate to London or New York and carve out professional
roles for themselves while participating in Muslim political groups to
build their influence. Others will make bombs or blow them up. Either
way they will be doing what young men in the Arabian Desert have always
done, raiding to expand the territory of Islam, and the prestige of
their families and tribes.
It's easy to snicker at the discrepancy of force between al-Asiri,
embedding his bombs in underwear and a jet plane, but the bomb can bring
down the jet. And the Sons of Asir can bring down the West. All it
takes is enough time and effort, and so long as we give them money and
an open door, the Muslim world will have plenty of both.
The latest conquests of Islam may take a century to complete, but if the
demographic trends continue, then they will cover the territory from
the warm coasts of Spain to the frozen depths of Russia. The raids will
soften up the lands of the sword, cut away their people, intimidate
their governments into making concessions and use brute numbers to swarm
them and become the majority. It has happened for over a thousand
years, long before American foreign policy was anything more than a
dream, and it is happening now. All around us.
The demographic bomb is the most explosive of all the devices and it
doesn't show up on even the most intrusive airport scanners. Arafat
called the womb of the Arab woman his strongest weapon. The House of
Saud liked to say that they had built their nation with a sword of steel
and a sword of flesh. These two quotes explain the miserable state of
the Muslim woman and the quiet ticking of the demographic clock, the
bomb whose components are veiled women, trundling in groups behind a
single man, the girls exploited by Muslim 'Asian' sex gangs and the
rising number of female converts.
The biggest component of the bomb by far is still the jet plane, the
passing shape that can either be a direct weapon or an indirect one.
Before the 9/11 hijackers could hijack domestic flights, they had to
obtain permission to arrive here on international ones. As the domestic
population increases, the next wave of terrorists, men like Nidal Malik
Hasan, Tariq Menhanna or Anwar Al-Awlaki, don't even need the planes.
When the number of Muslims proliferates, so does the number of bombs;
the kind that al-Asiri makes and the kind that Arafat and the House of
Saud made. The kind that blow up right away and the kind that tick
slowly away from generation to generation, embedding themselves into a
society, undermining it, chipping away at its roots, until it is time
for them to go off. But whatever kind of bombs they are, when they go
off they destroy our lives and our freedoms. And when there are enough
Muslims around us, then life is a bomb.
No comments:
Post a Comment