Doc's Talk: Leadershipless unJews

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Leadershipless unJews

Very well formulated and even better written. You have a central role to play in any new true leadership as well.

As I mentioned several times, there is a slow shift on attitudes and preparations here about "regime change". True regime change.

As it is common for the unJews they assumed the concept themselves to appear to be doing the "change" thing as they did the "peace" thing.

This time they fool only themselves.

The tides are rising and they know it.

YET!

They unJews are preparing to destroy the State rather than allowing for system of government and participants true change.

This must be exposed as well.

KOL HAKAVOD

Professor SHmuel Halevy

AND

---

Hi Nurit:

I admit, I don’t get around to read all your essays. This one I read, andlike it much, much.

There is one little detail I would have added, and that is make exception of a few, either by naming them or not.

But is now water under the bridge.

hugs, Goldi, Canadians for Israel's Legal Rights (CILR)

AND

---

I sent your essay to Salomon, see his message to you below.

from Salomon

Goldi...I don't know where it will be published but I think she makes many excellent points.

On Avram Burg, for Instance, I couldn't agree more.

If you happen to talk to her, give her a HUG from me!;-)

xoxoxo Salomon Benzimra Author of the book: The Jewish People Rights ti the Land of Israel

----------

Israel is a young country and in its short lived time has accomplished much more than countries that have been on earth for much longer. But Israel is now at a cross road as a Jewish democratic state. Changes are now required so it can continue on the path of its success and even better it.

---

Nurit Greenger

The recent death of Yitzhak Shamir, the state of Israel 7^th Prime Minister prompted me to write this essay.

I personally yearn to see leadership and at present I see none in Israel or anywhere else in the world.

What does leadership really mean?

Leadership means resolve and courage and dedication to the people of your nation. Yitzhak Shamir was unconditionally and totally devoted to the state of Israel and its land.

Leadership means projecting nationalism, steadfast mind, cautiousness and thorough thinking and evaluation of each circumstance the state is facing and how to resolve it to the best benefit of the state. Shamir operated along these lines and apart for few instances almost to no fault.

Leadership means modesty. Shamir was one such man.

Shamir knew all so well that Never Again means Never Again; when he was once seen vacationing in a remote Italian Kosher resort, though not religious, when asked why there and not in any other resort, his reply was, "I can relax among Jews." Shamir projected love for his people, the Jews.

That brings me to the subject of love for nation and country.

The people we see taking position in Israel's leadership today, and in fact for a long while, do not project leadership. They literally make me rather nervous because their line of operation sways like a leaf in the wind. Nothing about their actions appears consistent and steadfast and in many cases they operate against the interest of the Jewish state and seem to be a clear line of thoughtless actions.

So to say about people who take positions in Jewish organization worldwide. In many cases they are collaborationists with people who have the worst interest of Israel at heart.

Best example of dubious leadership is the Oslo Accords, where Israeli leaders conceded to have another Arab state on Israel's legal land, or Israel's unilateral evacuation from Gush Katif as well as the ongoing destruction of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria without any obvious or legal reason. Simply a collaborationism with the enemy of the state or a deep dislike to it.

These leadershipless people are deservingly now called unJews. And they have followership in Israel itself and the Diaspora.

Some say that they are operating under the control of foreign powers that all have a long held plan to destroy the State of Israel and the Jewish Heritage so it is brought to its end and then can never be reborn.

The Israelis call it "combina," meaning, trickery along which these people shred every item of evidence that is supporting Jewish rights. And thus we see one decree after another to destroy Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria. That not only raises one's blood pressure but simple does not make any sense, especially when thousands of Arabs live in illegal communities and build illegally on land that is not allocated or belongs to them while the unJews close both eyes and continue drinking from the well of leadershipless and senselessness.

The entire generation of the Oslo Accords has remained in control of Israel and has been continuing the destruction of the Jewish state plan, which Oslo represents.

One good example of an unJew is the former Knesset Speaker Avraham Burg who has expressed support for a recent decision by several countries to label, separately from products made in other parts of Israel, products produced in Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria (Yehuda and Shomron). That means opening the door wide to those who still insist that Judea and Samaria are not part and parcel of the entire state of Israel to boycott these products along their belief in such falsehood: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/156660#.T9FLJcVG0dc

Shimon Peres, the current president of Israel, for instant is a light unJew. I am certain that he has good intentions about Israel's survival. However, his actions at times put his ego ahead of good nationalism, something Shamir would have never done. Peres cannot bring himself to finally admit that he has made a grave mistake when he gave birth to the Oslo Accords disaster, which killed thousands of his nation's innocent citizens and then close the file he has so thoughtlessly opened. Peres is still calling for a two state solution of some sort when all indications lead to believe that such state will be the end of Israel; this is a very unJewish behavior and acts.

Many sources inside Israel claim that the unilateral "construction freeze" in Judea and Samaria that Prime Minister Netanyahu declared in November 2009 has never been fully lifted. (Netanyahu declares 10-month settlement freeze 'to restart peace talks' - http://www.haaretz.com/news/netanyahu-declares-10-month-settlement-freeze-to-restart-peace-talks-1.3435)

To begin with it was a very unJewish act, thus make Netanyahu unJew light too. Why did he pass such a decree when Judea and Samaria are legally part of the state of Israel as was ruled by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922? (Marking the End of the Construction Freeze in Judea and Samaria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rurf7HajFIs)

Real changes are now required for Israeli society to produce real leadership. However, rather than supporting a REAL and good change, and there are groups that can lead the way, even activists who charge for such changes go back to people from "within"; go back to the unJews and their misleadership.

I am sure people would love to see and will support leadership they can trust, but can they?

Time to end the unJewish behavior and bring new people on board, such as Caroline Glick, Professor Emeritus R. Aumman, Sarah Honig, Professor SHmuel HaLevi, Professor Emeritus J. Golbert, Professor Steven Plait, and there are many others and create a new system of government.

Raze the self elected courtiers and give the people the right to freely elect fair and balanced judges. After all Israel is a democracy, meaning by the people for the people.

In the new system make sure that the military is totally apolitical, which is not the case today.

Allow a Radio Free Israel to have a voice. Enough of hearing only the Leftist and deceitful media that dominates Israel.

End the treasonous behavior of the Arab-Israeli members of the Knesset. It is not healthy for the Israeli citizenry and people from abroad to see such denigration of the state, which represents the disrespect of all the constituents.

End the overwhelming illegal infiltration into the country. We all understand that there is a deep concern for humanity involved here and the need to help the needy, but the law is the law and illegal is illegal. Anyone wants to come live in Israel must apply to do so through the right channels and allow the state to decide if he or she are welcome. Just like immigration is conducted in every country on earth. Israel is not a lawless state as this infiltration advocates; that anyone can enter it and stay.

Only describing the settings is not enough. Solutions must be implemented and the removal of the unJews from all spheres of government must be an immediate act. Remember unJew is the one who projects doubtful interests in the state and its citizenry.

How? By leading millions into a march to Jerusalem to demand the changes; if they can march for social justice, they can march for political justice.

Right now it appears that many of Israel's echelon are very unJewish and thus are unfit to lead the Jewish people.

Shalom, Nurit

---

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk