Doc's Talk: Lowering Heads for Vicky

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Lowering Heads for Vicky

Nurit Greenger

For those who, for one reason or another, do not know or have, for one reason or another, forgot, on July 4^th, 2002, ten months after 9/11, the first Islamic-jihad attack on innocent people took place in Los Angeles, California.

On July 4, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, a 41-year-old Egyptian national Moslem, living in Orange County, south of Los Angeles, California, carrying a 45-caliber semiautomatic Glock pistol, a 9-millimeter handgun and a 6-inch knife, shot and killed Victoria 'Vicky' Hen, a 25 year old ticket agent, who was working at the El Al counter, the state of Israel national airlines, at Bradley International Airport Building, LAX, Los Angeles. He then opened fire on a line of 80-to-90 people who were waiting in line for El Al's outbound flight #106 to Toronto and ultimately to Tel Aviv, killing 46 year old Yaakov Aminov and wounding four others. Hadayet was then shot dead by Haim Sapir, an El Al security guard.

After the attack, when the police searched Hadayet's apartment, they found a sign taped to his door saying, "Read the Koran."

The FBI concluded that the attack was terrorism, although the gunman acted alone. In September 2002, Federal investigators concluded that Hadayet hoped to influence the US government policy in favor of the Arab-Palestinians, and that the incident was a terror act.

Vicky Hen was on her job with El Al for only two months; she was greeting and assisting passengers flying business class. Coworkers said that Vicky had a talent to take care of people and problems always with a smile. The following day, her fiancé was to have formally ask for her hand in marriage in a family gathering.

Victoria Hen was buried in Los Angeles and survived by her parents, Avinoam 'Avi' and Rachel Hen, and her young brother Udi.

Like each year, for those who remember this Islamo-jihad terror act, the 4^th of July celebrations' day began with remembering Vicky Hen, Yaakov Aminov and the horrific terror attack. At exactly 11:20 AM, while standing by the plaque in Vicky's memory, placed in a small yard on the side of Bradley International Airport Building, LAX, the attendees lowered their heads for a moment of silence in memory if the innocents their lives were cut short.

Due to the diligent and influential work of Vicky's father Avi Hen, Orly Halevy, a professional photographer, a community activist and a friend of Hen family and Scott Jacobs, of Democracy Broadcasting News, unlike previous years, this year the media came in full force to cover the memorial ceremony LAX El-Al Terror Attack: 10 Year Memorial - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwszhHtPBYA&feature=youtu.be

Scott Jacobs moderated the commemorating ceremony. Danny Gadot, Consul of Consular Affairs at the Consulate General of Israel, Los Angeles, spoke and said that all people must stay together against terrorism. Klaus Benamy-Hackel, who was El-Al Station Manger and Vicky's boss at that time remembered Vicky and could not hold back his tears. And Amani Mustafa, a former Muslim, an apostate, who fled oppression in Egypt to the land of the free, the United States of America, and is now working for The Mission of Ministries Network that reaches out to Muslims around the world with the truth about Islam, delivered her tribute speech in which she said that love conquers hate and fear, the hate and fear Islam so easily portrays to have and the love it so much lacks. Ms. Mustafa also mentioned that since 9/11 over 19,000 deadly attacks by Moslems took place.

In the past ten years the Hen family encountered many obstacles before the government of Israel finally recognized Vicky as a terror victim. Avi Hen has dedicated much of these past ten years to unfold the motives of Hadayet's act, the efficiency, or lack, of the FBI and airport security that could have prevented this terror act; there are mounting evidence that are not favorable to our security forces.

On this day, July 4^th 236 years ago, a group of fifty or so men gathered in what would become one of the most important meetings of all time. They had spent months discussing and weeks deliberating to have arrive to this moment. In a vote that would have monumental consequences, on July 2nd, 1776 the Continental Congress decided that the American colonies should declare their independence from Great Britain. Two days later, the United States Declaration of Independence was signed. Afterwards, John Adams wrote to his wife, saying,

"The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever more."

John Adams was certainly correct in that America's independence would be a day worth celebrating for years to come. It turned out that since 2002 onward, the Hen family will be put in the position to celebrate America's independence with mixed sentiments of sorrow.

I continue my claim that we are living in an Era of Absurdity. We have subjected ourselves to accept Islam for what it is, a murderous political ideology, and we have taken a defense mode against it rather than defeating it.

I also claim that there is a unique and parallel code of existence between the USA and Israel.

Vicky was murdered on the same day Americans celebrate America's independence and the founding of a country that believes in one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Hesham Mohamed Hadayet did not believe in American principles; he believed in the Koran that teaches the hate of Jews and other non-Moslems and he acted according to these warped principles.

Hadayet was found to be connected to Egyptian jihad militant Islamic group. One of such groups is the Muslim Brotherhood its emblem is green in color with the Koran and two sharp swords in it. In 2005 they published a map of the world in the center is a green area, the color of Islam, and in a lower panel it said: “One hundred years from now,” with the field completely green.

So let us connect the dots. Islam's followers are out to kill Americans, as we saw in 9/11 and want to conquer the world. They are out to kill Jews, as we see in Vicky's murder and the innumerous of Israeli-Jews victims of Islamo-jihad terror.

On the 4^th of July let us remember what we stand for that is liberty; let us remember Vicky Hen and Yaakov Aminov who died because they were Jews; and let us not forget and standby the grieving family, Rachel, Avi and Udi Hen.

May Vicky's memory be blessed.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk