A reader asks: where are all these tens and even hundreds of millions of Muslim anti-Islamists.
I
wrote an entire book about the liberals and moderates called The Long
War for Freedom. There are a number of scholars who have written such
books, even analogies of moderate Muslim writings. Oh, yes, and then
there is every book and article written by non-Islamist Muslims over
decades.
The
problem today is that we are caught between two lies. The mainstream
Western lie is that Islam is a religion of peace full stop. There is
nothing at all militant in its texts. A small fringe of extremists have
misinterpreted it or are even heretics. So all Muslims are moderates
pretty much, either moderate moderates or moderate Islamists. And anyone
who says otherwise is an Islamophobic racist.
That is a lie.
But
then there are those—far smaller in number and lacking power in the
mainstream media or universities but present in other places—who say
Islam is the problem full stop. It is inevitably militant, extremist,
and violence. There is no such thing as political Islamism because all
Muslims want Sharia dictatorships. So the radicals are proper
representatives and there are few or no moderates at all. And anyone who
says otherwise is a wimpy apologist sell-out.
And that’s a lie.
Let me once again define the two key groups of Muslims who are anti-Islamist and relatively moderate by far in comparison:
--Muslims
who are moderates are people whose religion is Islam but are not
revolutionary Islamists. They might be Arab nationalists, or
pro-democratic; they might be primarily loyal to identities as Turks,
Kurds, Berbers, Iranians; or supporters of a communal-ethnic grouping
like the Sunni Muslims of Lebanon or many of the Muslims of both types
in Iraq or a variety of Muslims in the former Soviet republics and
Russia itself who have national or communal identities. [Note: I don’t
consider Alawites or Druze to be Muslims but if you do then you can
count them as anti-Islamist Muslims, too.
And
don’t forget
all those Indian Muslims and Muslims in many countries who might
support any one of many different parties or movements. There are
Muslims who are left-wing, too. And then there are huge numbers of
African Muslims who aren’t Islamists but have other loyalties.
In
other words, lots of Muslims have their own political views. Remember
for example that 60 percent of Tunisians voted for secular parties. In
Turkey, the Islamists had to disguise themselves and there are so many
opposed to them that if the rival parties ever got their act together
they could toss them out of office. Even in Syria there are lots of
liberal, moderate, or traditional Sunni Muslims. If we only helped those
people rather than the Islamists (thanks to Obama policy and its
funneling through Islamist Turkey and financing by Qatar and
Saudi Arabia) the moderates might even win.
These
people listed above vary in their religious views from pious, to
different varieties, to lax, or secular but they are still Muslims.
--There
are far fewer people who could be called moderates who want to reform
Islam in some active way. Perhaps it is the relative shortage of these
people that is misleading. The number of liberal Muslim reformers is not
large, partly due to repression and intimidation. To some extent,
though not completely, a lot of the alleged power of the reform movement
is a creation of Western apologist propaganda. Yes, real moderate
reformers do exist—a variety of articles and books deal with
their ideas—and they are courageous people. Unfortunately, the Western
mass media often favors the phonies.
Yet
aside from all the varieties of Islam (one of which is the moderate
Sufi view) and relative secularists and the sincere but relatively
inactive Muslims, there’s something else, too. I call it
conservative-traditional Islam and it has been very powerful.
Conservative-traditional Islam has dominated, for example, the Arab
world and Iran and Turkey and lots of other places for decades. It has
several different approaches.
Among
the Shia there is the “Quietist” Islam which means to be very religious
and stay out of politics. This is the Islam that
Ayatollah Khomeini battled, defeated, and his regime has tried to
repress. But it is very much alive and one day—though it might take many
decades—it will boot out the Islamists of today right to the bottom of
the Persian Gulf. It is also very active in Lebanon and in Iraq, too.
Then
there is the conservative-traditionalist Islam that has controlled the
official positions throughout the Arab world and will now be rooted out
by the Muslim Brotherhood if it can. These clerics are not necessarily
lovable liberals but they are not advocates of violent revolution and
people who fully intend to implement genocide. They viewed the
Islamists as heretical and just ignorant, though many have surrendered
or gone over to the winning side.
And
in some places, notably Indonesia and places in sub-Saharan Africa, a
systematically moderate Islam has emerged and run things for many years,
though it is being challenged by the Islamists.
One
more thing, if the foolish and ignorant governments in many Western
countries actually helped real moderates, secularists, assimilationist
or acculturating-oriented Muslims, and even conservative-traditionalist
ones, perhaps the Islamists would be getting pushed back in the West,
especially Europe. Instead, the intellectual establishments and
governments often back, coddle, fund, and cheer the radicals.
Imagine
being an Italian immigrant to America in the 1930s who hated Mussolini
or an anti-Hitler German and being told that the anti-democratic front
groups were the real and legitimate representatives of your people! And
while the analogy is far from exact (it happened some but nothing like
today's equivalent): the American media romanticizes the pro-Hitler
German-American Bund, conceals its fascist antisemitism, and then other
people ask: Where are the moderate Germans?
So
let’s get it straight: Revolutionary Islamists are real Muslims with a
big base of support who want to impose repressive Sharia dictatorships.
They draw on actual Islamic doctrine and can argue that their views are
legitimately those of the Koran and the other holy texts. They are not a
small minority but a growing mass movement that in places either has
majority support or can whip the majority into line. Telling the truth
about what is in Islamic texts is an intellectual duty. Showing how
radicals use these texts is simple scholarly integrity.
But
that doesn’t mean that all of Islam is inevitably radical. It doesn’t
mean that the revolutionary Islamists are right and all their Muslim
opponents are wrong. It doesn’t mean we don’t have courageous allies
among Muslims. And they are far more courageous than the posturing
Western ignoramuses who romanticize the revolutionary Islamist
murderers.
We
don’t have to agree on everything but I have met so many such valiant
people—as well as people I didn’t like but we recognized our need to
cooperate—it would take a long story to tell. Let me leave you with one
experience.
I’m
lecturing at a university in North America. Of course, I am there as an
Israeli; I am explaining Israel and its policies; but I am also
explaining that the great battle of our time is that against
revolutionary Islamism. In the front row sits a young man, a graduate
student apparently, wearing the biggest Palestinian kaffiyeh I’ve ever
seen. As I speak, he nods vigorously. His smiling and evident agreement
throws me off more than if he had been heckling me.
At
the end of the talk he rushed up and said something like the following:
“I’m a proud Palestinian. I want us to have our own free country. And I
don’t want those Islamist crazies to keep the battle going for my whole
life or turn my country into a nightmarish dictatorship.”
I’ve heard parallel things from Turks and Iranians, Syrians and Iraqis, Egyptians and Tunisians, and others.
OK.
One more. I was speaking at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg,
France. I was wearing a nice suit and tie. I come out and there is a
demonstration of 300? 400? Iranians against the repression of the regime
there. I walk over and shout out, in my very limited Persian, “Long
Live Free Iran!”
They go crazy applauding. They crowd around me: Am I a European member of parliament?
No,
I explain, I’m an Israeli just giving a talk there. Their faces fall.
Not one—not one—single European Member of Parliament has come out to
join them or congratulate them or cheer them. Not one non-Iranian
European has come to march alongside them.
The Westerners only turn out to bash Israel, even if it means cheering Hamas and Hizballah.
Sure,
Muslim communities in Europe and America hardly ever renounce terrorism
or fight the Islamists or explain to converts that Usama bin Ladin and
Khomeini and the Muslim Brotherhood aren’t big heroes.
Why?
Because those radical forces are in power, often with collaboration
from Western leftists, intellectuals, academics, and officials. Ask any
moderate Muslim or Muslim who is moderate whether the mass media show
any interest in interviewing him to discuss the battle against the
radicals.
And
yes we have the right to demand that these communities teach against
revolutionary Islamism and terrorism instead of pretending it’s all an
Islamist plot.
But ask just not why more moderates don’t exist, ask why you aren’t helping them and acting as their allies in our common
battle. After all, their lives are the ones most on the line.
Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in
International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of
International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His
book, Israel: An Introduction, has just been published by Yale University
Press. Other recent books include The
Israel-Arab Reader (seventh
edition), The Long War for
Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan). The website of the GLORIA Center and of his blog, Rubin Reports.
His original articles are published at PJMedia.
Professor Barry Rubin, Director, Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center http://www.gloria-center.org
The Rubin Report blog http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/
He is a featured columnist at PJM http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/.
Editor, Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal http://www.gloria-center.org
Editor Turkish Studies,http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713636933%22
--
1 comment:
60 percent of the Koran talks about violence/war/jihad.As you can see, the Qur'an definitely teaches that it's people are to fight for the cause of Islam. This list of verses is important because they are within the holy book of Islam. What are we to conclude if a Muslim is to take the Quran seriously? Is he not obligated to slay non-Muslims, to go to war, to kill those against Islam, etc.? Isn't this what the verses are teaching? Yes, they are and this is the source of Islamic terrorism.Stand up and speak up!Truth alone Triumphs!When you criticize Nazism you are not criticizing the Germans. Similarly criticizing Islam does not mean being racist to Muslims.
Post a Comment