Hilary's Hilarious Excuse

Nurit Greenger| December 18, 2012

Did Hilary Clinton faint because her stomach has been churning knowing she has to be under heavy questioning about Benghazi on December 18, 2012? Is it in itself a proof of Hilary Clinton is guilty?

This is like a child who has not done his homework so he is declaring sick in order not to go to school.

But that is not the issue.  All people should be greatly concerned about the USA state of mind and affairs.

Hilary Clinton had no training to be a Secretary of State and probably will end up with a legacy as one of the less best Sec. of State the USA ever had.

The leadership we elect is dreadful; they cannot lead.

If we do a slight comparison, the only difference between USA and Israel is that Israel's economy is growing at a fast pace but Iran can end this growth in few minutes. Both countries can no longer produce a leadership cadre.

Woe to anyone abandoning their self defense means and under Obama and the Left administration the USA has abandoned much of her deterrence; Israel has been doing so for many years.

At this point we have some comparison to make about Benghazi and the murder in Connecticut.

A mentally sick and/or a psychopath, who appears totally amicable, all of a sudden, BAM, he or she shocks a nation, shocks the world!  He or she becomes a perpetrator of mass murder. The Connecticut killer mental state failed, it had stopped protecting his rational thinking and allowed him to go on a killing spree to kill for the sake of killing.

In Benghazi, the USA government emissaries were confident that while doing their job their government has their back and will protect them when called upon and needed. But in Benghazi, the USA government had failed to protect its workers and BAM, they were killed.

The equation: the Connecticut murder's brain equates to the USA government, both failed those they served.

The horror in Connecticut is beyond anything anyone can fathom and describe. The horror that took place in Benghazi is as bad, equally gruesome. Only that in Benghazi grown-ups died while they tried to defend themselves.

In Sandy Hook School the children had only their instincts to help them defend themselves and perhaps escape; in Benghazi, they had guns to try defend themselves but not sufficient to overcome bigger guns they perpetrators used.

Now, in the case of the Connecticut mass murder, the Left is trying to make it a political issue; restrict, further, the already restrictive gun laws. Get more control over the people. In Benghazi the USA administration is trying, very hard and mind you in a conniving manner, to conceal its mishandling and failure and is working to dismiss and undo any political accusation and thus to appear "innocent".

In both cases, the Connecticut murderer and the USA government are equally GUILTY as charged.

Ask yourself, how do those beasts come to be?

In the case of the murderer in Connecticut, by having a parental upbringing that failed and/or the lack of the right medical attention needed for his mental state. In the Benghazi case, it is a pure attestation to inept leadership and the way the government operates, along a grab of power and no accountability; government bureaucrats act as if they are above the law, even make their own law as they go along. The people do not count. In both cases, killing occurred.

Forget about the guns; obtaining guns in the USA does not meet with a mount of obstacles, and any terrorist can get a gun in Libya, or elsewhere.

If sales of guns is restricted further in the USA, more murders will occur and matters will be even worse. Guns do not kill, people do. If Benghazi is not investigated thoroughly and the ineptness revealed and thus corrective measures are taken, terrorists will go on attacking USA venues all over the world as they have been doing for years.

We better start pondering what makes our society a hatchery of such beasts; what makes our society a hatchery of such evil despicable government.