It's infuriating when agents
outside of Israel act against Israel. But there is something uniquely
distressing about damage we do to ourselves. This is what I'm seeing now
-- and feel compelled to write about. The current situation is not only
unacceptable, it's intolerable.
First, there is the prisoner
release that took place this week. Ostensibly, because we "promised" at
the beginning of the negotiations. It was the lure to bring the PA to the
table.
No one in Israeli officialdom, it
seems, ever confronts the question of why the PA would need an enticement to
come negotiate in order to secure the state they keep claiming they want.
They should be running to talk.
~~~~~~~~~~
When the time for
releasing the prisoners approached, and there was much protest on the
right, the left -- and most specifically Tzipi Livni -- made an
accusation: Well, you could have agreed to freeze settlements instead
(about which more following). But since you refused to stop building, we had to
promise the prisoner release.
Excuse me? We had to? It was
incumbent upon us to make some sort of commitment that is not in Israel's best
interests?
What is more, Naftali Bennett,
head of Habayit Hayehudi, who has been opposed to the release of prisoners,
directly contradicted the Livni charge: "This is a lie and a total
fabrication. [That he agreed to a release of prisoners to protect
construction.] I was never presented with those two
possibilities. Netanyahu told me [about the prisoner release] after it was
a fait accompli."
~~~~~~~~~~
There is no question but that the
PA has been pumping for release of prisoners and referring to it as a key
priority. This said, however, the promise -- the commitment to
release prisoners -- is not really to the PA but to Obama. That
there was great pressure from the White House is certainly the
case. In his eagerness to be able to boast a diplomatic
achievement in this part of the world, Obama bent over backwards to find ways in
which Israel might entice Abbas.
But there is a time to say
NO.
~~~~~~~~~~
A demonstration at Ofer Prison,
where the terrorists about to be released were held; protests registered
by members of the coalition; the emotional pleas of families of the victims
of these terrorists -- none of it made a difference to Netanyahu, who insisted
that a promise had been made and it was necessary to follow through.
"The decision to free prisoners is
one of the difficult I have made as prime minister," he declared. "This
decision was necessary in our current reality. We have to navigate through a
complex international area full of challenges."
I believe that Netanyahu is
severely deluded -- that within his distorted view of matters he continues to
believe, in the face of much evidence to the contrary, that there are rewards
from the international community for Israeli sacrifices.
Yesterday, Defense Minister Moshe
Ya'alon echoed his boss, saying that the prisoner release was necessary because
of "long-term security considerations."
Time was, when this refrain was
fed to the Israeli public, I would wonder if maybe, just maybe, there was a quid
pro quo coming down the road for what was being done -- something we were not
aware of. I stopped wondering about that a long time ago. It's
nonsense.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Twenty-six prisoners were
released. Five to Gaza, and 21 to Palestinian Arab areas of Judea and
Samaria. Those 21 were let go in the small hours of the morning on
Wednesday -- the intent being to damp down media attention and celebration by
the PA. It didn't work. The PA celebration was larger than it had
been with the first release this summer (104 are slated for release in four
intervals).
Credit:
scmp
~~~~~~~~~~
Murderers, welcomed home like
victors. Every single one has Jewish blood on his hands.
"Terrorists who kidnapped, lynched
and murdered IDF soldiers and reservists; ambushed and slaughtered unarmed
hikers; killed a defenseless couple sitting in their care in a secluded forest
at night..."
What sort of nation releases such
terrorists from its prisons?
~~~~~~~~~~
And what sort of people celebrate
and adulate their terrorists? Abbas hugged and kissed them all, calling
them "heroes."
Yesterday he declared that there
would be no agreement with Israel as long as even one Palestinian Arab remained
in Israeli prisons.
~~~~~~~~~~
Also yesterday, the Israeli
government announced plans for additional building over the pre-1967 line --
with final permits having been given for 1,500 apartments in Jerusalem (Ramat
Shlomo, pictured) and hundreds more in communities in the large blocs in Judea
and Samaria, such as Ma'aleh Adumim, Betar Illit, and Ariel.
Credit:
JPost
Additionally, preliminary plans
were announced for another 2,000 units beyond the security barrier and outside
the large blocs, in communities such as Ofra, Beit El and Shilo. The prime
minister also gave the final go-ahead to a national park east of Hebrew
University's Mount Scopus Campus and for a tourism and archeological center
opposite the entrance to the City of David.
All this building is great. But
the timing of this announcement is hardly a coincidence, and the intent here on
Netanyahu's part to mollify the right wing of his coalition after the prisoner
release is obvious and publicly acknowledged.
~~~~~~~~~~
As could have been predicted,
there was a furor over this, with Palestinian officials saying that this was
"destroying the peace process."
My favorite headline on this issue
came from Israel National News yesterday: "Ban: Releasing Murderers is
Good, Building is Bad."
That about sums up the
international attitude in many quarters. No criticism that Abbas kisses
terrorists. That's not counterproductive to "peace." Hey, so what if it
incites Palestinian Arabs to be like those celebrated terrorists?
But building past the pre-1967
line, that's a whole other story. The UN Secretary-General says it's
"contrary to international law."
He's walking proof of our need to
solidly promote the Levy Report.
~~~~~~~~~~
Interestingly, the JPost
today cites an Israeli official who said that the US and the PA both knew that
our release of prisoners would be accompanied by an announcement of construction
plans.
~~~~~~~~~~
Now, having mentioned Ban, let me
segue into a related issue at the UN -- this regarding the UN Human Rights
Council.
About 18 months ago, Israel walked
away from participation in the Council because of a continued and egregious bias
against the Jewish state.
Anne Bayefsky of Human Rights
Voices explains:
"The Council...adopted a
short permanent agenda that governs every regular session. It contains one item
for censuring Israel alone [Agenda Item 7], and one general item for all other
192 UN countries combined. Thirty-five per cent of all the resolutions the
Council has passed that are critical of specific states have been directed at
Israel – compared to nothing on states like Russia, China, or Saudi Arabia."
The Europeans and the US,
warned Bayefsky, were "strong-arming" Israel into rejoining the Council. She
provided a painful picture of the way in which the Council
operates.
~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, on Tuesday, Israel caved to that massive pressure and came
forward for additional biased treatment, assurances to the contrary not
withstanding.
Not a good move.
As the JPost editorial today, explains:
"Admitting that the council has a 'strong bias against Israel,' the US
delegation to the UNHRC nevertheless argued that by staying away, Israel was
forgoing the opportunity to 'present its own narrative.' The trouble,
though, is that nobody at the council is listening.
"...Now Israel has switched tack and two days ago defended its record in a
hearing that descended into a kangaroo court, where some of the most repressive
regimes pass judgment on a sterling democracy and where the damning verdict [in
a "Periodic Review"] had been composed long before the proceedings began."
~~~~~~~~~~
But wait, we're not done yet. This is what the Israeli representative to the UNHRC, Eviatar Manor, told the council on Tuesday:
But wait, we're not done yet. This is what the Israeli representative to the UNHRC, Eviatar Manor, told the council on Tuesday:
"All of them [the released prisoners] have blood on their hands; all of
them have murdered Israelis. Their release, I believe, illustrates
Israel's determination to reach an agreement with our Palestinian
neighbors..."
How pathetic can it get? We need a huge dose of national
pride.
~~~~~~~~~~
Let me note here that, while Washington thinks nothing of strong-arming
Israel, yesterday, Kerry observed that the US would "not succumb" to fear
tactics by those opposing the diplomatic engagement with Iran.
~~~~~~~~~~
But let me end on an upbeat note.
For a very brief interval of time recently, Abbas, speaking for the PA,
reportedly said that he would consider an interim agreement with Israel --
something that, according to rumors, Netanyahu is seeking, since he knows that a
final agreement will not happen.
But very quickly thereafter, Abbas claimed he never said anything of
the sort. Either he was misquoted in the first place, or he
backtracked in the face of enormous anger from his own people. Now
Abbas has returned to demanding everything: Israel's return behind the
pre-1967 line, half of Jerusalem as a Palestinian Arab capital, etc. etc.
In any event, the assessing is that whether Netanyahu may have been
shooting for this -- as Deputy Minister of Defense Danny Danon has charged -- or
not, the current composition of the government would make such a deal
impossible.
From an impeccable source, I have it that Saudi Arabia is so furious at the
US for Obama's stand on Iran and on Syria, that Saudi officials are
advising the PA not to cooperate with Obama. What is more, some Fatah
officials are saying that they won't consider any compromise in negotiations
because they don't trust Obama.
~~~~~~~~~~
©
Arlene Kushner. This material is produced by Arlene Kushner,
functioning as an independent journalist. Permission is granted for it to be
reproduced only
with
proper attribution.
If
it is reproduced and emphasis is added, the fact that it has been added must be
noted.
This material
is transmitted by Arlene only to persons who have requested it or agreed to
receive it. If you are on the list and wish to be removed, contact Arlene and
include your name in the text of the
message.
No comments:
Post a Comment