ALAN CARUBA
Who said:
"We're going to take things from you on behalf of the common good"
"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few,
by the few, and for the few...and to replace it with shared
responsibility, for shared prosperity"
"(We) ...can just let business as usual go on and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to
give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common
ground."
"I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the
most profitable sector in the entire economy that they are being
watched."
"I certainly think the free market has failed."
Was it Joseph Stalin? Lenin? Hugo Chavez? Kim Jong II? All reveal a communist philosophy.
It was Hillary Clinton. Over the years, Hillary has made it clear
that the redistribution of wealth-communism-is central to her beliefs
and that her regard for capitalism and the free market economy of
America is nil.
The election of Hillary Clinton would be an extension of the two terms of Barack Obama and, if possible, worse.
There are moments when a politician's opportunity to win elections
passes-often unnoticed at the time. I think that time was 2008 when
Hillary lost the Democratic nomination to an unknown Senator from
Illinois who offered "hope and change."
Eight years later, having served as his Secretary of State, she will
share his growing disapproval as Obamacare unfolds as the perfect
namesake of the worst President the U.S. has ever known. And then, of
course, there is their shared Benghazi scandal.
For these reasons, I believe Hillary will decide her time has passed
and elect to avoid the ordeal of a presidential campaign even if the
Democrats gave her the opportunity.
Her long career in the public eye has been filled with scandals and
failures, not the least of which was her early advocacy of
"HillaryCare." When her husband was President, she was put in charge of
developing a plan to take over the healthcare sector despite the fact
that she was not an elected official, but merely his wife. It was
overwhelmingly rejected.
The most astonishing thing about the 2016 elections is that the Party
still regards her as the sole candidate to run for the presidency even
as 2014 Democrats seeking reelection are fleeing the disastrous failure
of Obamacare and the huge debt that Obama imposed on the nation. In
addition, elements of the Party's base, Millennials-younger voters-and
Hispanics are among those deserting it while some are beginning to call
for Obama's resignation.
There is something so disconnected from the facts, from reality,
about the Democratic Party that it suggests that those who remain within
its numbers are deranged.
Some political pundits will be inclined to dismiss Hillary as too old
to run, that her agenda would not stand up to examination, that she
would be in effect Obama's third term, or that her record as Secretary
of State is littered with lies and failures.
Democrats do not vote based on such things. They vote out of a
nostalgic attachment to its past, to its message of fairness and
equality, out of concern for its false "war on women", "income
inequality", and the accusations leveled against the Republican Party
and the Tea Party movement. Democrats will be driven by the belief that
it is time for a woman to be President, no matter how awful her
qualifications or political beliefs.
This is also a belief of the nation's leftist media and the momentum
of news coverage about Hillary will be orchestrated by her. In the
meantime, she will earn tidy sums giving speeches and receiving every
leftist award that's out there. No doubt there is a book in the works as
well.
Hillary has left a long record of scandals in the course of her
"public service." The most recent was the lies about the killing of an
American ambassador and three security personnel in Benghazi on the 2012
anniversary of 9/11. Most famously, under questioning she said, "What
difference does it make?" Nowhere during the course of her service as
Secretary of State is there a single major international treaty or
significant accomplishment. Indeed, her tenure is marked by the severe
loss of respect for America and its influence over foreign affairs.
The Clintons have always been about the acquisition of money to fund
their lifestyle. In 1979 Hillary earned $100,000 profit on a $1,000
investment in cattle futures within the course of just nine months. She
was guided to the windfall by a highly placed Tyson Foods connection. An
investigation into her role as an attorney with the Rose law firm was
stymied until its billing records magically appeared in her White House
office, years after they had been subpoenaed.
Like Obama, Hillary never recalls anything involved with her past.
She knew nothing. She was the victim of others around her. It's all a
right-wing conspiracy.
The real conspiracy has been the takeover of the Democrat Party by
the far Left and its elected office holders who appear to have no regard
for the decline of the nation thanks to their relentless spending and
borrowing.
Hillary Clinton has been among the most relentless of all Democrats,
concerned only with her determination to become the next President and
for the acquisition of wealth that puts her and Bill firmly in the one
percent of the extremely wealthy that Democrats and liberals defame.
A significant defeat of Democrats in 2014's midterm elections will
influence her decision. A lot can happen between now and 2016. Even the
mainstream media's fixation on getting her elected may decline. Stay
tuned.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
Read more:
Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-relentless-hillary-clinton?f=must_reads#ixzz2rbhz8Dtm
Under Creative Commons License:
Attribution
No comments:
Post a Comment