Sultan Knish
In one of the curious ironies of history, the Democratic Party, in its
present form, is animated solely by opposition to majority rule; an
obsession that it attempts to disguise with insincere attempts at class
warfare.
There is nothing that the Democratic Party fears so much as democracy,
which is why it is far more comfortable ruling through judicial rulings
and the unrestricted powers of an unelected bureaucracy. Obama's two
victories have given it a taste of a post-majority and post-American
country ruled by a coalition of minorities, but its glee at that may be
premature.
The Democratic Party has built its house of cards on locking in
political and economic privileges for the different tiers of its
coalition. From food stamps to government jobs, it is the old political
machine gone nationwide, dispensing money and privilege to the different
group of its coalition, as a remedy for the supposed privileges enjoyed
by the majority.
It still talks about equality, now and then, but it has no interest in
equality, because that's too close to democracy. An equal population
might start voting on economic merits, rather than the old game of
special favors and privileged positions, and the Democratic Party, with
its baggage train of professors who have never done anything more
difficult than bore a class to death, bureaucrats who fear reform worse
than death, and corporate and union bosses who expect special favors,
would have nothing to offer them.
The coalition of the privileged underprivileged, united against the
majority rule of the people who, unlike them, only erratically vote in
their own self-interest, can achieve impressive turnouts, but that
turnout is dependent on having something to gain from an election. And
the closer the coalition of minorities comes to being the majority, the
more unsustainable the payoffs become.
Liberalism has spent so much time working to destroy majority rule, that
it has no idea what to do beyond that. Its only ideas involve
suppressing majority rule through government power. It is incapable of
meeting any challenge that cannot be oriented on the old familiar axis
of oppressor and oppressed... and that makes it incapable of mature
government.
Democrats with any economic sense turned on Obama after it was clear
that he was incapable of having a serious conversation about economic
reform. Those who didn't, like Bloomberg, made it clear that they
supported him for his social policies, not his economic policies. After
the election, Obama justified their fears by going back to pushing tax
hikes and cuts to the military as the solution for out of control
spending and debt.
Cutting the military has long been a fond dream of the left and there's
plenty to cut. By the time Obama is done with the military, they really
will be down to horses and bayonets. Raising taxes will bring in a
little more money which will be thrown down the same old coalition hole
as the money that came before it.
The Democrats are incapable of function as a majority party any longer.
They have no solution to the country's economic problems because they
are unwilling to take responsibility for them. All their prescriptions
involve looting the things they oppose and transferring the money to the
things they support, substituting more radical redistributionism for
responsible government, and then refusing to take responsibility for
anything that they have done.
The outcome of this program can already be seen in the cities where
Democrats collect the most votes; from the living and the dead. But the
abandoned houses, the dead streets and the factories that haven't made
anything in fifty years do nothing to dissuade them from their course.
Having ruined the country's greatest cities, they are certain that they
failed only because the pigeons fled the coop for the suburbs and for
freer cities. Give them the whole country and they will have all the
money they need to crack down on on the people who want to work for a
living on behalf of the people who want to be taken care of by the big
benevolent hand of the state.
Repeat the process nationwide and the country will go the way of the
cities. Economic growth will stop, companies will flee and the
Detroitization of America will continue apace.
America will have government jobs and jobs subsidized by the government.
Everything will be affordable, but will cost more and be hard to find.
And there will be no one left to pay for any of it.
The Democrats don't imagine that they will end up here because it's not
supposed to happen. But their brief modern history as a party at odds
with mathematics and reality is littered with things that were not
supposed to happen, but did anyway. The old crooks of Tammany Hall had
no more morals than a shark on a blood trail, but at least they could
count. They knew that they were dirty rotten thieves and they gloried in
it.
Tammany Hall men were thieves who pretended to be social workers. Their
idiot descendants are thieves who believe that they are actually social
workers and that their social programs make them immune from
mathematics. Tammany Hall chiefs kept count so as to know when to grab
as much of the loot as possible and flee the country, like Richard
Croker who fled back to Ireland with millions of dollars to continue his
hobby of buying racehorses, or Boss Tweed who made it as far as Spain
before being taken for a child molester. Their latter day counterparts
can't count and imagine that they'll be Solar Barons living high off
their carbon credit investments in their offset flying cars. Their worst
flaw may be that they don't even know when to run away.
The Democratic Party was mildly respectable as a party of thieves. It is
now a party of thieves tagging along behind a leadership that combines
the best qualities of the Bolsheviks and the sensible management style
of the Jacobins, engaged in a perpetual revolution against a power
structure that consists of themselves, a dissolute upper class
Republican opposition and a working class population that hates their
guts, but has no idea how to get rid of them.
The Anti-Democratic Party functions in perpetual opposition, even when
it is in power, blaming all its problems on their Republican
predecessors, the way that their Bolshevik compatriots blamed the lack
of bread on the problems inherited from the old regime. It never makes
mistakes because it is never in power. It is hanging around Washington
and representing the oppressed in between the Republican Administrations
who show up to clean up its messes.
The Democratic Party defines itself by opposition, opposition to
property, opposition to values and opposition to any and all structures
that predate its latest revelation from the Angel of Political
Correctness. It is constantly tearing things down and takes no
responsibility for building things up again. Even its building programs
are a destructive tearing down of something. It tears down coal and oil
to build unworkable solar and wind stations. It tears down private
enterprise to add more draining government jobs. It tears down freedom
to build up government.
As a party in perpetual opposition to its own disasters, the Democratic
Party is free to take power without ever taking responsibility for the
uses of that power. As an Anti-Democratic party, is it not meant to be
accountable to the voters or to the unfair system that they stand for.
It is determined to build a system that will exist only to tear down
their power and that is the gloriously dysfunctional system that we have
now. The perpetual revolution for perpetual revolutionaries who are
only working within the system to blow it up and then collect a nice fat
pension from the system.
Such a state of affairs cannot go on forever. The Democratic Party has
gotten what it wanted and that is to fundamentally transform America.
But aside from a brief spurt of gloating, it cannot accept that either
because it would mean ending its way on the majority that is a minority
and bending down to the business of good government. And that is a
little too much like having a real job with real responsibilities and
real accountability.
The Democratic Party has become the left and the left does not know how
to govern a country, only how to oppose the government of a country.
That is why the left is invariably purged by the more sensible members
of its own movement once the revolution is complete. It's either that or
be stuck with them. The left knows that the only way to get anything
done is to get rid of the left. It's the rest of the country that has
yet to learn the same lesson.
No comments:
Post a Comment