Sultan Knish
Some nights ago I sat in an emergency room while a 19-year-old heroin
addict was brought in. It was after midnight, the witching hour, on a
weekend when the zombies and ghosts of the city's party circuit begin
drifting in dressed in their best clothes, escorted by police officers,
clutching bloodied rags to their faces or lying on stretchers and always
at their articulate best.
The girl came from a wealthy background and was articulate enough to
hurriedly assemble her story. An addict since her teenage years, she had
been clean for a while and never used anything but heroin, except
occasionally cocaine. The drug use was just a single slip, one mistake,
and then she would be clean again.
Anyone who hasn't worked with addicts doesn't know how charming and
persuasive they can be. The addict is the distilled ego focused on a
single burning need. All the cleverness and intelligence of the human
being, the attributes that we would ordinarily use to work, create,
befriend and empathize, become tools for protecting the addiction and
the supply.
Addicts are intense because they are among the few people in this world
who know exactly what they want. They can be charming, but their
routines are mechanical. They retain only enough of their humanity to
charm us into giving them more of what they want. It is their only
reason for interacting with us. The addict is pure ego and the drug is
the only focus of their ego. The addict needs so badly that he or she
becomes an incarnation of need. Their humanity is slowly or rapidly
burned away leaving behind nothing but the animal need, their outer
characteristics consumed by their ego and then their ego consumed by the
id.
The girl was no friend or family member of mine. I had seen many like
her and as our civilization unwinds into its own night of the soul,
there will be many more like her. Having all the advantages of life, she
was desperately unhappy and like so much of the modern world that tunes
in to Oprah for tips on how to be happy, that browses self-help
sections on a desperate quest for happiness, she was still trying to be
happy. Her cry was the cry of a country addicted to emptiness and losing
its soul.
I do not come to judge or to moralize about how people live their lives.
Even the best of us are flawed and even the worst of us have their
moments of redemption. Many are addicts of one kind or another, becoming
tethered to the thing that assures us happiness, even as it seems to
drain us of something vital. Many such addictions can be harmless, but
when an addiction becomes unsustainable, then it becomes a death
sentence. A death of the soul followed by the death of the body.
While I sat there, trying to ignore the noises, the shrieks of pain, the
pleas for help and the mumbles, the Republican Convention was beginning
to recede. My fingers tapped out the essay on a 3'5 inch screen that
would become, "How to Write About the Republican Convention."
Ahead of me lay the Democratic Convention, the addicts convention, the
festival of that corner of America that was not so slowly losing its
soul.
I did not, I could not anticipate the full insane spectacle of it at the
time. No one could have. But I sensed that it would sound a lot like
the heroin addict in the bed, shrieking at her parents, changing
emotional pitches in a moment from hysteria to sweetness, turning on the
momentary charm with the nurses, innocently assuring the staff that she
was not a user. And it did. It was a lunatic addict festival with
designs by LSD and math by cocaine addicts fresh from Wall Street and
social programs from potheads.
All that outrage over Mitt Romney's 47 percent hits home because we are
all users. Some of that usage is more legitimate. Some of us are using
money that we put in there as insurance and some of us are using money
that we didn't. But that's not the real story. The real story is that
our social safety net was supposed to be like one of those, "Take a
Penny, Leave a Penny" tills that depend on the honor and neighborliness
of a community. And we don't have that community. What we have is a
fragmented mess of givers and takers who are not the same people.
This isn't about wealth or class. Some of the wealthiest men in this
country, like Warren Buffett, are parasites who feed off taxpayer money.
Some of the poorest men and women work hard for a living and put back
more than they take out.
It's not entirely about race, though partly it is because the black
community and some other minority groups, have become addicted to
something more toxic than heroin or cocaine, and they feel entitled to
take and take because some of their ancestors were once slaves and
because there was once segregation in the South and because they feel
certain that white people look down on them. It's not about gender,
though the collapse of the family has put more of the burden on women
and tried to fill that gap with social services.
It's about community. It's about who we are as a country. It's about the
America of the people who feel ashamed when they aren't doing their
best to work and the America of the people who feel ashamed when they
don't take the system for every penny they can. It's about who feels
that they owe and who feels that they are owed.
The left talks about community a great deal, but their vision of
community is a giant till where everyone is forced to put their money
and their bureaucracy decides how many people get to keep what percent
of their money and how many get to keep other people's money. There is
none of the individual responsibility that makes a community work, only
the obligation to follow orders all the time for the greater good. There
is no community, only ranks of addicts waiting to be taken care of.
The essence of a community is that its individual members feel a sense
of responsibility toward one another. Without that sense of
responsibility, we all become takers, tuning in to listen to the latest
government announcement to learn how much we can expert to make and how
much we will lose. We become experts at wheedling government officials,
we all become lobbyists and a lobbyist is a paid representative for
someone else's addiction.
It is the ego that defines the addict, that terrible sense of need that
becomes the mirror of the self, and for all the talk of community, it is
that need and that accompanying fear that the need will be cut off,
that defined the Democratic National Convention, with its special
pitches to the most addicted groups, promising that unlike the
Republicans, we will never cut off your supply. At least not until we
start running low and all the apartments of the people with money are
broken into and then we'll have to start deciding who gets the good
stuff and who gets a death panel.
Liberalism has defined entire groups by their need, their addiction to
the supply of government, and taught them to feel an angry entitlement
to their welfare checks. It has taught them that they are good people
for wanting to take other people's money and that anyone who doesn't
want to give them what they want is a bad person. This is addict
moralizing, the spectrum of moral behavior in which the only thing that
exists is the need and the barriers to meeting that need.
Addiction goes by different names now. Racism is one of them, but there
are many names and they all mean the same thing. "I want," the koan of
addiction, the incantation that becomes the identity of the addict as
the one who needs. "I scream, you scream, we all scream for more, more
and more." The rhetoric, the talk of privilege, the academic papers, are
only the complex rationalizations of addicts, their mechanical
arguments for doing what they want and taking what they want.
This kind of addiction is unsustainable. It is personally unsustainable,
it is communally unsustainable and it is nationally unsustainable. A
nation where takers begin to outnumber givers cannot endure. It has no
future and barely has a present. A nation run by a 'former' cocaine user
who is forever tossing out schemes for fixing everything that have all
the substance of an addicts' plans to get clean is in deep trouble.
Addicts do not get by on results, they get by on personal charm and
schemes. They get by on tricking people into meeting their needs. And
that convinces them that, like all criminals, they are very clever. The
more suckers they lure in, the more convinced they become that they are
unstoppable, that they will go on flying forever beyond the sunset on
their drug of choice.
Money is our current drug of choice and like all drugs it appears
infinite. We are buying our own debt and selling it back to ourselves
and lending ourselves the money to buy our own debt in a spiral that
seems beautiful and sensible to an addict, but is a complete disaster to
anyone still functioning in the real world.
Obama's solution to all problems is to shoot up more money. Billions,
trillions, it doesn't matter because the money is unreal and therefore
infinite. It works because we believe in it and he's in office because
he convinced people to believe in him. To him, money, like his persona,
is an act of faith and all he has to do is convince everyone to go on
believing. And if we ever stop believing, then like a certain coyote
with his own improbable schemes, we will crash down to the ground.
The addict seeks the unreal state because it makes him happy. It is the
real world that depresses him. Enough Americans chose to shoot up Obama
and a smaller number are still committed to their hope drug because he
makes them happy. And fooling them makes Obama happy. All the money is
just a counter that everyone trades back and forth in exchange for
happiness. Trillion dollar deficits are how we know we're getting high.
The addict cannot cope with the knowledge that the unreal world he has
built for his own pleasure is finite. He lashes out violently and
angrily at the intrusion of the real world into his sphere, he tries to
keep the lie going a little longer, manipulating those around him while
inside him the growing frantic sense that the whole thing is about to
collapse builds and builds. He rationalizes and makes excuses and
promises to fix everything if he can just get the money to pay for what
he owes and one last hit. Just one last hit.
America can have a social safety net, but it has to be one based on the
responsibility that we all feel toward one another, not on empty cynical
rhetoric about "giving back" to people who feel no sense of
responsibility for anyone outside their own group. That's just a nation
of enablers propping up a nation of addicts until the addicts outnumber
them and the country collapses into one big Detroit. It cannot be based
on the empty promises and lies, that sound no different whether they are
coming from Obama or a 19-year-old heroin addict. It cannot be based on
charm or ignorance of the truth.
Whatever social safety net we have must be communal, it must be open and
transparent, and it can only be maintained by a nation of honorable
people, by people who feel guilty about taking a penny and feel good
about leaving a penny. Anything else is just one more hit.
No comments:
Post a Comment