Doc's Talk

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

The Brent Shapiro Foundation for Alcohol and Drug Awareness was founded after the Shapiro family lost their son to this drug and alcohol consuming disease. The Foundation is working relentlessly to help those who have been caught in the web of this number one world epidemic of drugs and alcohol addiction.

---

A Sick Society That Needs a Doctor

The Brent Shapiro Foundation for Alcohol and Drug Awareness

Nurit Greenger

I would never venture into writing about a subject I am not somewhat familiar with. I am not familiar with addictions and sobriety – Alcohol and/or drugs – because I have never been an addict.But after I have attended few days ago The Brent Shapiro Foundation for Alcohol and Drug Awareness

(http://www.brentshapiro.org/) annual "2012 Summer Spectacular" Gala, it left me with no option but to write something so perhaps I can save one person's life with what I heard and what I write about here.

My first conclusion of the event was, it takes an awful tragedy to take an action. As my late mother used to always say, it takes two or three accidents in an intersection that has no traffic lights, all ended in fatalities, for the city to finally mark the intersection with the proper traffic lights. It took an unfortunate event for the Shapiro family in losing their son Brent to take the bull by the horn and spread the word, that addiction is a worldwide disease that society must deal with and contain it as it is incurable.

Many of us became familiar with Robert Shapiro as the mighty attorney who defended O.J. Simpson. Robert is married to Linell. Until October 9, 2005 they had two sons, Brent and Grant. The Shapiro's short story of a huge tragedy to any family who loses a child is that since his early teens Brent was addicted to drugs and alcohol. In his early 20's Brent turned his life around and was sober for eighteen months; he was attending college and was doing very well. Only that one evening he went to a party and got off track; he took half a tab of Ecstasy and had two drinks. He became ill but was not rushed to the hospital right away is they people with him should have done. By the time he was taken to the ER he already lost his life, leaving father Robert, mother Linell and brother Grant to face a new reality.

Brent was 25 year old when he died so prematurely.

It was the 7^thSummer Spectacular for The Brent Shapiro Foundation; the 7^th year for this Saving Life event. Over 1000 beautiful people were shuttled to a extraordinary large estate in Beverly Hills that belongs to Mei Sze and Jeff Greene. The setting in the front yard of the palatial house offered the guests cheese snacks, non-alcoholic beverages while pretty stewardesses gave away sponsors' beverages and e-cigarettes. The guests were of all ages, dressed in the glamorous fashion; there were well know personalities among them I saw and recognized Astronaut "Buzz" Aldrin, TV personality Larry King, Ron Popeil, of Ronco Online Product Catalog, Kristen "Kris" Jenner, previously Kardashian, Christopher Kennedy Lawford and I am sure many others; the many beautiful and young ladies added décor to the glitz. The guests included the many sponsors of the Foundation, friends of the Shapiro's and I am sure some people who were there for the first time to mingle or even to listen as they are seeking help. I was told that each year the attendee crowd grows larger. A Ferris wheel and photo booth, by Foto Cabina (http://www.fotocabina.com/) added to the atmosphere.

Then came a sit down dinner time that was set on the estate's backyard, catered by Wolfgang Puck Catering (http://www.wolfgangpuck.com/). The evening’s program, with former addict Television broadcasting personality Pat O’Brien, as the Master of Ceremonies, included the performance of Landon Eugene Murphy Jr. , American's Got Talent 2011, Chris Rene, one of the finalists during season one of The X Factor USA, live auction, conducted by Robert Shapiro, and runway fashion show with gowns by 'G by Gil'.

As each year, the Foundation gave the Spirit of the Recovery Award, for sobriety and giving back to society, this year to Christopher Kennedy Lawford. This award was first given to Kelly Osbourne,the daughter of Ozzy and Sharon Osbourne and Sugar Ray Leonard was second to receive it.

Then Audrey Stoltenberg got on stage to receive a college scholarship the Foundation awarded her and to tell her story. Audrey was an addict since her youth, rejected by her family. She was in and out rehabilitation institutes and juvenile hall until she was taken in by Phoenix House, a nonprofit drug & alcohol rehabilitation organization with 150 programs in 10 states. (http://www.phoenixhouse.org/locations/california/). There in Phoenix House with the help of dedicated staff she turned her life around. To receive The Brent Shapiro College Scholarship you have to qualify, you have to be clean and sober and ready to take on the world. Audrey did just that and was rewarded.

The Shapiros' tragedy, resulted in a strong alcohol and drug awareness message, they are now tirelessly conveying through their activities and Foundation has become very successful and people respond and join. The Summer Spectacular event is put together each year is one of the most glitzy and glamorous events that have taken place these past seven years in the glitzy Beverly Hills, California town.

I sat next to a lovely couple, Ivana Ognjanovic, a general litigation attorney and her husband Gojko Vuckovic who knew Brent Shapiro and have been coming for years to the event in his name. We agreed that we can relate as we all have children.

Alcohol and drugs are now considered to be an epidemic. To bring awareness to focus, the Shapiro's wrote the book, David’s Discovery, in memory of the son they lost, which helps with addiction prevention. They also worked tirelessly to have the Good Samaritan laws passed; these are laws, or acts in some cases, obliging people to give reasonable assistance to those who are injured, ill, in peril, or otherwise incapacitated (duty to rescue), and in all cases protecting people who do so against legal action. The protection is intended to reduce bystanders' hesitation to assist, for fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrong death.

So The Brent Foundation is the advocate for a sick society. Behind the evening's glitz there is a great need to help our society.

They say it takes a life to save a life; best you do not wait until then.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.