Fjordman
A report prepared by groups in the various Nordic countries has proposed instituting a legal ban
on anti-Feminist “hatred,” comparing this to “racism.” Representing the
left-wing coalition government in Norway, Ahmad Ghanizadeh from the
Socialist Left Party (SV), the State Secretary in the Ministry of
Children, Equality and Social Inclusion, was positive towards the
proposal, and promised that the government would look into it.
My initial thought upon hearing this is that Leftism is now officially a religion,
and that its proponents desire a “blasphemy statute” to ban any serious
discussion of left-wing doctrines and their consequences as “hate
speech.”
Writer and fellow online dissident Takuan Seiyo commented that not even George Orwell could have come up with anything that tops this scenario. Yes, there is a serious proposal afoot in Norway to ban “anti-Feminist hatred”.
Yes, the ministry really has the Orwellian name of Ministry of
Children, Equality and Social Inclusion. And yes, this State Secretary
in Norway really is called Ahmad Ghanizadeh, originally from Iran.
In 2013, Norway’s Minister of Culture is Hadia Tajik,
whose Muslim family came from Pakistan. One must assume that Prime
Minister Jens Stoltenberg of the Labour Party appointed her partly to remind
the native population that they no longer have a culture, only
“Multiculture,” but mainly in order to appeal to the Muslim and other
Third World immigrant voters whose support his left-wing coalition
depends upon in order to stay in power.
PM Stoltenberg in his prestigious New Year’s Speech
for 2013 promised that his government would seek to ban “hateful
utterances” on the Internet. The year before, Stoltenberg used his New
Year’s Speech, always broadcasted on prime-time national TV and watched
by a large proportion of his countrymen, to launch a frontal attack on
alleged “totalitarian seducers” who use the Internet to spread unfounded
“hatred.”
I was shortly afterwards contacted by the journalist
Ragnhild Sleire Øyen from the state broadcaster NRK, the local
equivalent of the BBC, who considered it obvious that the Prime Minister
was referring to me personally. I’m sure many other citizens got the
same message, and that may well have been intentional.
The PM didn’t mention any names explicitly, but then
he didn’t have to, since so many others had done that dirty job for him.
His right-hand man in Labour, Party Secretary Raymond Johansen, has
singled me out for public attack by name several times, both before and
after the Prime Minister gave this speech, as one of the individuals
spreading irrational “hate” against Islam and therefore holding me
partly responsible for the mental climate that allegedly created Anders
Behring Breivik. I wasn’t the only name on that short list, but I
usually topped it.
Norway is a small country, but I still find it
unhealthy that a sitting political head of state uses his most
prestigious annual speech addressing the nation to launch a thinly
veiled attack on individual citizens who have done nothing criminal. An
analogy for Americans would be if the President of the United States
used his State of the Union speech to launch a thinly veiled attack on
writers who use the Internet to publish ideas he dislikes, for instance
the conservative author Michelle Malkin, or Glenn Reynolds with his
major blog Instapundit. Even Obama hasn’t gone that far, at least not
yet. The Social Democratic Prime Minister of Norway has.
Who gets to define “hate,” and do negative feelings always come out of nowhere?
What if public anger, assuming it exists, actually has a cause that
needs to be addressed? For example, being displaced in one’s own country
by often hostile tribes? Should we simply ban any real discussions of
this problem instead of dealing with the actual cause of public
frustration? If so, what will be the long-term results of such a policy?
Elisabeth Skarsbø Moen is the debate editor and a
regular columnist in VG, one of Norway’s two largest newspapers, and the
largest one with a truly national readership. She writes in positive
terms about Feminism, while at the same time championing the continued
mass immigration of people from cultures that are extremely hostile to
women. Like most other Western Feminists of her ilk, she sees no
contradiction in this.
In October 2012, Skarsbø Moen wrote a deeply emotional column in VG entitled “Our children”,
where she lamented that her society sometimes makes a distinction
between “our” children and “other” children, that is, people born in
other countries. She chastised her own country for not treating all
children born anywhere on the entire planet as equally ours. The
occasion concerned two young male Muslim asylum seekers from
Afghanistan.
I don’t know these specific individuals, but
it’s a fact that quite a few of the young asylum seekers who come to
Europe from Afghanistan are actually young adults who lie about their
age; so they are in fact neither children, nor are they “ours.” Skarsbø Moen thereby managed to tell two blatant falsehoods in just two words.
It also must be mentioned that these “children”
usually bring with them an Islamic culture that is often violent and
usually extremely hostile to women’s liberties. Yet this self-appointed
Feminist does not seem to care much about that, or worry about the
future consequences of allowing such a culture gain a foothold in her
own country. Skarsbø Moen’s column was pure emotional pornography about
how cruel and evil we are for not allowing potentially violent and
generally hostile Muslims into our countries.
Neighboring
Sweden has in little more than three decades metamorphosed from a safe
country into being flooded by street crime and having one of the world’s
highest recorded rape rates. Young blond girls in
Stockholm suburbs are getting used to being called “whores” on a daily
basis, and sometimes dye their hair in an attempt to avoid sexual
harassment in the streets of what once was their own country.
Coincidentally,
this transformation all took place at the same time as the largest wave
of mass immigration in recorded history, much of it from brutal and
repressive male-dominated cultures. Yet most of the
left-wing or Marxist Feminist activists and journalists in Scandinavia
strenuously deny that there is any connection between these two
phenomena, and will aggressively attack as “racists” those who dare to
suggest that the mass immigration they support has caused any of this.
In December 2011 a Swedish mother-of-two was subjected
to a brutal gang-rape by perhaps a dozen young male asylum seekers from
Afghanistan in a refugee camp in Mariannelund, Sweden — although only
seven of them were convicted for this gruesome crime. Swedish newspapers
such as Aftonbladet systematically conceal the ethnic identity
of the perpetrators in cases involving immigrants, though, and only
show photos featuring white criminals.
Reports stated that “The rape
was oral, anal and vaginal sometimes with three rapists inside her at
the same time while everybody was cheering and clapping. The gruesome
rape marathon lasted for 7 hours. 11 suspects may have been involved,
taking turns while drinking and getting high on drugs. The asylum
seekers were cheering and clapping their hands during the rape marathon
while calling the victim ‘whore’ and ‘slut’.”
The Swedish victim went into shock and has naturally
become heavily traumatized. She is now subject to panic attacks and
lives in a psychiatric clinic. She is also bound to a wheelchair due to
the damage to her abdomen. The main perpetrator – Rafi Bahaduri, 25 –
had already committed four other rapes in Sweden that we know of.
Despite this, Elina Gustafsson, a local member of the Swedish Social Democratic Youth League (SSU) who defines herself as a “proud Feminist,” thought it would be “racist” to expel these convicted Muslim criminals.
I’m reminded of another left-wing politician from
Sweden. The Marxist Feminist Gudrun Schyman, then the leader of the
“reformed” Communist party, in a speech in 2002 suggested that Swedish
men are just like the Taliban. Fredrik Virtanen, a male columnist for
the national newspaper Aftonbladet, immediately agreed with her that yes, Western men are just like the brutal Taliban regime and other Muslims from Afghanistan.
The young woman from Mariannelund, Sweden who just had
her life ruined might disagree with this claim. Even native-born
psychopaths rarely behave in this manner, yet such a treatment of women
is unfortunately not rare in the most repressive parts of the Islamic
world, whose primitive tribal cultures Western authorities insist on
mass-importing to our cities.
Gang rapes and certain other types of violent crime
were exceedingly rare in the Nordic countries a few decades ago, but are
currently in the process of becoming routine. In Trondheim, Norway, on
the 28th of May 2011, a young girl named Eva Helgetun took
her own life. She was just 14 years old, and had been gang-raped by
immigrants a few weeks before. Too many others share her fate.
In the 1960s when the so-called Second Wave of
Feminism began, often with strong Marxist inspirations, Western women
were relatively safe compared to women in other parts of the world. Half
a century later, Western women have never had more Feminism, yet they
and their children have also never been less safe.
Perhaps pointing out this fact constitutes “hate” in the eyes of some people, but that doesn’t make it any less true.
The
problems caused by Third World mass immigration will not go away if we
ban people from speaking truthfully about them. How hard can it be for
members of the ruling elites to grasp this simple fact?
No comments:
Post a Comment