The lesson from the Boston Marathon bombings could not possibly be clearer. Yet few people, due to various complications, will address that real issue.
Part
of the problem
is this. Most powerful institutions and people say that Islam is a
religion of peace. There’s no problem, except for a few mysterious
extremists who just seem to pop up either at random or due to American
and Western sins.
The
next largest segment says that Islam is an inherently violent and
extremist religion so since the problem is Islam there’s nothing to do
but to combat it directly in some form.
Both of the main Western responses, then, deny the importance of waging a real and serious battle within Islam.
Yet
where do the terrorists come from? In the case of these two brothers,
they were Muslims all of their lives and yet suddenly they
became—without any major direct experience—radical terrorists.
The
cause, of course, was revolutionary Islamist propaganda, especially
but by no means exclusively, from al-Qaida. There are literally
hundreds of Internet sites, videos, preachers, books, and everything
else you can think of that promote revolutionary Islamism. They tell
Muslims that they should and must be revolutionaries and terrorists;
they cite holy works to do so.
What the heck is there on the other side?
Let’s think for a moment about some of the things that don’t exist:
--A Radio Free Islam that systematically preaches (the last word is not chosen at random) an anti-extremist approach to Islam.
--Virtually
no programs at mosques to explain why terrorist, Islamist, and
extremist Islamic positions are wrong and bad. Wrong because they don’t
accord with what those who say so deem to be a “proper” Islam; bad
because they are immoral, ruin the lives of those who embrace such
ideology, and hold back the societies where enough such people have such
a view.
--Remarkably
little literature and remarkably few preachers—especially ones who are
as well-financed as the radicals—that a young Muslim is going to read on
Internet or hear on videos or elsewhere which suggests an alternative
path.
--Where are the videos? Where are the web sites? Where is the social disapproval among Muslims?
On
the basis one could argue that there is no moderate—or at least no
non-violent, non-revolutionary-- Islam that can be developed. But that
simply isn’t true. The works and the moderate individuals exist but they
are not given support, even in Western countries, nor do they have the
resources to wage the
battle.
It is like the situation in the Cold War when the Soviets and their supporters were well-organized
and well-financed but the social democrats, liberals, and conservatives
opposing them were not. Not only the U.S. government--through covert
and other means--stepped into the breach but so did lots of
organizations, foundations, non-governmental organizations, and others.
Now in the era of Islamism there are two specific problems.
First, any Western, non-Muslim financing or help to those groups would be used to discredit them.
Second,
in a bizarre manner Western societies favor the radicals, giving them a good press and praise.
Third, moderate Muslims are penalized and ignored.
Fourth,
the ability to critique precisely what is radical in Islam and what is
wrong with Islamism is handicapped by the successful effort to brand any
attempts at
making such distinctions as “Islamophobia” instead of a sensible fear
of revolutionary Islamism. It is equivalent to branding any such attempt
to critique Communism as anti-Sovietism or as a mindless antagonism to
liberalism or pure reactionary views. Communists tried such techniques
but they only worked to a very limited extent.
Fifth,
part of the last three problems is due to the far left’s (often
pretending to be liberal) alignment with radical Islamism (the current
world’s most powerful right-wing ideology), despite the latter’s
repression of women’s rights, desire to murder gays, and opposition to
just about everything else the left is supposed to oppose.
Sixth, who cares that Islamist organizations that are mere covers for radical activities issue a statement decrying an Islamist terror attack simply because it was staged by some other group, wrong place, or at an inconvenient time? Let them campaign against radical, violent, and intolerant interpretations of Islam or be exposed for who they really are.
Sixth, who cares that Islamist organizations that are mere covers for radical activities issue a statement decrying an Islamist terror attack simply because it was staged by some other group, wrong place, or at an inconvenient time? Let them campaign against radical, violent, and intolerant interpretations of Islam or be exposed for who they really are.
This,
then, is the dilemma and why young people like Tsarnaev brothers will
be indoctrinated with extremist Islam with almost no alternative offered
on the other side. If groups that are Muslim Brotherhood fronts are
going to be treated by the American establishment as normative, moderate
Islam, what space is there for any real moderate Islam?
If
the
enemy is not going to be defined as radical Islam or Islamism or some
other phrase that identifies the issue, then how can anyone campaign
against such doctrines?
The
West has paralyzed itself and, ironically the first people who are
going to suffer are Muslims who are not Islamists and not radicals. The
proper allies and those to whom sympathy is to be extended is not Hamas,
Hizballah, the Muslim Brotherhood, the radical Islamists in Syria, the
sophisticated Islamists in Turkey, CAIR, and such groups but their
enemies within the Muslim community.
That
is the lesson of the Boston Marathon. Otherwise, there will be
many more Tsarnaev’s just as there have been repeated “conversion”
experiences to become radical terrorists in case after case in the
United States, United Kingdom, France, and many other countries over the
last decade.
With
a massive pro-Islamist, pro-terrorist propaganda machine on one side
and almost nothing on the other side how could someone expect anything
else to happen?
If you are interested in reading more about Egypt and radical Islamist movements, you're welcome to read my book Islamic Fundamentalists in Egyptian Politics online or download it for
free.
Please be subscriber 31,384 (among more than 50,000 total readers). Put email address in upper right-hand box: http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com
We’d love to have your support and
work hard to earn it. See our new feature with 13 free books at http://www.gloria-center.org. Why not make a tax-deductible donation to the GLORIA Center by PayPal: click here.
By
credit card: click here.
Checks: "American Friends of IDC.” “For GLORIA Center” on memo line and
send to: American Friends of IDC, 116 East 16th St., 11th Fl., NY, NY
10003.
--------------------
Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA)
Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His
next book, Nazis, Islamists and the Making of the Modern Middle East,
written with Wolfgang G. Schwanitz, will be published by Yale University
Press in January 2014. His latest book is Israel: An Introduction, also published by Yale. Thirteen of his books can be read and downloaded for free at the website of the GLORIA Center including The Arab States and the Palestine Conflict, The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East and The Truth About Syria. His blog is Rubin Reports. His original articles are published at PJMedia.
Professor Barry Rubin, Director, Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center http://www.gloria-center.org
The Rubin Report blog http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/
He is a featured columnist at PJM http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/.
Editor, Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal http://www.gloria-center.org
Editor Turkish Studies,http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713636933%22
No comments:
Post a Comment