http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7702
Redacted from
an article by Ashish Kumar Sen
The Washington Times
The Washington Times
In an
increasingly polarized world, the small Caspian Sea nation of Azerbaijan is a
tantalizing study in contradictions. It’s a staunch American ally sandwiched
between the U.S. nemeses of Iran and Russia, providing a critical transit for
U.S. troops and supplies in and out of Afghanistan. Yet most Americans probably
can’t spell the country’s name on first chance or pinpoint its location on a
map.
It’s also a
Shiite Muslim country that rejects the theocracy of Tehran in favor of a
secular government while expanding its already friendly relationship with
Israel. It’s also a former Soviet republic that has cast off the shackles of
its once socialist economy to experience significant growth around its booming
oil industry. All that makes Wednesday’s election in Azerbaijan of keen
interest to U.S. diplomatic, intelligence and military circles even though
there’s little suspense: President Ilham Aliyev is widely expected to win his
third five-year term.
“It is the
only country that borders both Russia and Iran. Therefore, it becomes a pivotal
state when it comes to issues such as containment of Iran, as well as access
for Americans, not only into the Caucasus, but also into Central Asia,” said
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official who is now a resident scholar at the
American Enterprise Institute. “If Azerbaijan weren’t resource-rich and if it
didn’t have the geopolitical position it has, I don’t imagine that so many
Americans would be increasingly interested in the former Soviet republic.”
The
U.S.-Azerbaijani relationship is based on cooperation in several areas,
including regional security and energy. Azerbaijan has supplied troops to work
with U.S. forces in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Since 1988,
Azerbaijan has been mired in a conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, a
primarily Armenian-populated landlocked region in Azerbaijan that is held by
ethnic Armenian forces and unilaterally declared itself an independent republic
in 1991. While Armenia, once a powerful lobby in Washington, has embraced
Russia, Azerbaijan has leaned toward the West. “There is a sense that if
Azerbaijan changes its orientation, American influence will be checkmated in
the region,” Mr. Rubin said. “Political stability in Azerbaijan is to the
benefit of America’s strategic interests.”
Those
interests have left the Obama administration to wrestle with concerns about
what critics say is Azerbaijan’s authoritarian rule. A monthslong crackdown on
political opposition and a clampdown on freedoms of expression and assembly has
concerned some human rights groups. The National Assembly has passed measures
that increase prison sentences and fines for public-order offenses. In June,
Mr. Aliyev signed legislation that criminalizes defamatory views posted on the
Internet and allows prison sentences of up to three years. The Azerbaijani
government is engaged in a “deliberate, abusive strategy to limit dissent,”
Human Rights Watch said in a report in September.
Azerbaijani
officials brush off the criticisms, pointing to their strong support of
American interests in the region and their friendly relations with Israel. The
Obama administration is monitoring developments in Azerbaijan, straddling a
careful line of embracing an ally in a critical region while prodding it behind
closed doors and in public to enhance freedoms. In September, the Aliyev
government barred a delegation led by Mr. Melia from traveling to Azerbaijan to
observe preparations for the presidential election.
“We will
continue to urge respect for fundamental freedoms and the rule of law,
including due process before, during and after the presidential contest,” a
U.S. official said, speaking only on the condition of anonymity. The official
said the administration has called on Azerbaijan to ensure “a free, fair, and
transparent electoral process that reflects the will of the people.”
“I
respectfully reject the wrongful claim about going to authoritarianism in
Azerbaijan,” Ambassador Elin Suleymanov said. “We do not accept that. What is
going on in Azerbaijan is a truly independent nation with a vibrant political
system and a free-market economy.” He conceded that there is room for
improvement: “Just like every nation on Earth, we are not perfect.”
Azerbaijan won independence from the former Soviet Union in
1991. In 1993, Mr.
Aliyev’s father, Heydar Aliyev, was elected president. A decade later, in
October 2003, the younger Mr. Aliyev was elected to succeed his ailing father.
He inherited a nation on the cusp of major oil revenues and plagued by
corruption. In the ensuing years, the economy improved, and with it, the
standard of living.
Its human
rights record aside, Azerbaijan has plenty of advocates inside the United States,
including former Rep. Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican who wrote in a
Washington Times op-ed last month that America must be patient with its Caspian
ally.
“I know that Azerbaijan is not perfect. The Azerbaijani government is often criticized over its human rights record,” Mr. Burton wrote. “However, considering that Azerbaijan — like other former Soviet republics — has scant experience with democracy, its human rights record is better than most. In fact, Azerbaijan’s religious tolerance, inclusiveness and protection of women’s rights should be recognized.”
“I know that Azerbaijan is not perfect. The Azerbaijani government is often criticized over its human rights record,” Mr. Burton wrote. “However, considering that Azerbaijan — like other former Soviet republics — has scant experience with democracy, its human rights record is better than most. In fact, Azerbaijan’s religious tolerance, inclusiveness and protection of women’s rights should be recognized.”
Mr. Burton
also stressed Azerbaijan’s increasing ties with Israel. Azerbaijan’s bilateral
trade with Israel reached $4 billion last year and about 40 percent of Israel’s
oil imports come from Azerbaijan, he noted. And when Azerbaijani Foreign
Minister Elmar Mammadyarov visited Israel in May, Israeli President Shimon
Peres described the trip as historic.
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and
international developments for The Washington Times.
- See more at:
http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7702#sthash.T6T9OpbP.dpuf
http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7702
Redacted from an article by Ashish Kumar Sen
The Washington Times
October 7, 2013
In an increasingly polarized world, the small Caspian Sea nation of Azerbaijan is a tantalizing study in contradictions. It’s a staunch American ally sandwiched between the U.S. nemeses of Iran and Russia, providing a critical transit for U.S. troops and supplies in and out of Afghanistan. Yet most Americans probably can’t spell the country’s name on first chance or pinpoint its location on a map.
It’s also a Shiite Muslim country that rejects the theocracy of Tehran in favor of a secular government while expanding its already friendly relationship with Israel. It’s also a former Soviet republic that has cast off the shackles of its once socialist economy to experience significant growth around its booming oil industry. All that makes Wednesday’s election in Azerbaijan of keen interest to U.S. diplomatic, intelligence and military circles even though there’s little suspense: President Ilham Aliyev is widely expected to win his third five-year term.
“It is the only country that borders both Russia and Iran. Therefore, it becomes a pivotal state when it comes to issues such as containment of Iran, as well as access for Americans, not only into the Caucasus, but also into Central Asia,” said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official who is now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. “If Azerbaijan weren’t resource-rich and if it didn’t have the geopolitical position it has, I don’t imagine that so many Americans would be increasingly interested in the former Soviet republic.”
The U.S.-Azerbaijani relationship is based on cooperation in several areas, including regional security and energy. Azerbaijan has supplied troops to work with U.S. forces in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Since 1988, Azerbaijan has been mired in a conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, a primarily Armenian-populated landlocked region in Azerbaijan that is held by ethnic Armenian forces and unilaterally declared itself an independent republic in 1991. While Armenia, once a powerful lobby in Washington, has embraced Russia, Azerbaijan has leaned toward the West. “There is a sense that if Azerbaijan changes its orientation, American influence will be checkmated in the region,” Mr. Rubin said. “Political stability in Azerbaijan is to the benefit of America’s strategic interests.”
Those interests have left the Obama administration to wrestle with concerns about what critics say is Azerbaijan’s authoritarian rule. A monthslong crackdown on political opposition and a clampdown on freedoms of expression and assembly has concerned some human rights groups. The National Assembly has passed measures that increase prison sentences and fines for public-order offenses. In June, Mr. Aliyev signed legislation that criminalizes defamatory views posted on the Internet and allows prison sentences of up to three years. The Azerbaijani government is engaged in a “deliberate, abusive strategy to limit dissent,” Human Rights Watch said in a report in September.
Azerbaijani officials brush off the criticisms, pointing to their strong support of American interests in the region and their friendly relations with Israel. The Obama administration is monitoring developments in Azerbaijan, straddling a careful line of embracing an ally in a critical region while prodding it behind closed doors and in public to enhance freedoms. In September, the Aliyev government barred a delegation led by Mr. Melia from traveling to Azerbaijan to observe preparations for the presidential election.
“We will continue to urge respect for fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, including due process before, during and after the presidential contest,” a U.S. official said, speaking only on the condition of anonymity. The official said the administration has called on Azerbaijan to ensure “a free, fair, and transparent electoral process that reflects the will of the people.”
“I respectfully reject the wrongful claim about going to authoritarianism in Azerbaijan,” Ambassador Elin Suleymanov said. “We do not accept that. What is going on in Azerbaijan is a truly independent nation with a vibrant political system and a free-market economy.” He conceded that there is room for improvement: “Just like every nation on Earth, we are not perfect.”
Azerbaijan won independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991. In 1993, Mr. Aliyev’s father, Heydar Aliyev, was elected president. A decade later, in October 2003, the younger Mr. Aliyev was elected to succeed his ailing father. He inherited a nation on the cusp of major oil revenues and plagued by corruption. In the ensuing years, the economy improved, and with it, the standard of living.
Its human rights record aside, Azerbaijan has plenty of advocates inside the United States, including former Rep. Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican who wrote in a Washington Times op-ed last month that America must be patient with its Caspian ally.
“I know that Azerbaijan is not perfect. The Azerbaijani government is often criticized over its human rights record,” Mr. Burton wrote. “However, considering that Azerbaijan — like other former Soviet republics — has scant experience with democracy, its human rights record is better than most. In fact, Azerbaijan’s religious tolerance, inclusiveness and protection of women’s rights should be recognized.”
Mr. Burton also stressed Azerbaijan’s increasing ties with Israel. Azerbaijan’s bilateral trade with Israel reached $4 billion last year and about 40 percent of Israel’s oil imports come from Azerbaijan, he noted. And when Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov visited Israel in May, Israeli President Shimon Peres described the trip as historic.
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
- See more at: http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7702#sthash.T6T9OpbP.dpuf
Redacted from an article by Ashish Kumar Sen
The Washington Times
October 7, 2013
In an increasingly polarized world, the small Caspian Sea nation of Azerbaijan is a tantalizing study in contradictions. It’s a staunch American ally sandwiched between the U.S. nemeses of Iran and Russia, providing a critical transit for U.S. troops and supplies in and out of Afghanistan. Yet most Americans probably can’t spell the country’s name on first chance or pinpoint its location on a map.
It’s also a Shiite Muslim country that rejects the theocracy of Tehran in favor of a secular government while expanding its already friendly relationship with Israel. It’s also a former Soviet republic that has cast off the shackles of its once socialist economy to experience significant growth around its booming oil industry. All that makes Wednesday’s election in Azerbaijan of keen interest to U.S. diplomatic, intelligence and military circles even though there’s little suspense: President Ilham Aliyev is widely expected to win his third five-year term.
“It is the only country that borders both Russia and Iran. Therefore, it becomes a pivotal state when it comes to issues such as containment of Iran, as well as access for Americans, not only into the Caucasus, but also into Central Asia,” said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official who is now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. “If Azerbaijan weren’t resource-rich and if it didn’t have the geopolitical position it has, I don’t imagine that so many Americans would be increasingly interested in the former Soviet republic.”
The U.S.-Azerbaijani relationship is based on cooperation in several areas, including regional security and energy. Azerbaijan has supplied troops to work with U.S. forces in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Since 1988, Azerbaijan has been mired in a conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, a primarily Armenian-populated landlocked region in Azerbaijan that is held by ethnic Armenian forces and unilaterally declared itself an independent republic in 1991. While Armenia, once a powerful lobby in Washington, has embraced Russia, Azerbaijan has leaned toward the West. “There is a sense that if Azerbaijan changes its orientation, American influence will be checkmated in the region,” Mr. Rubin said. “Political stability in Azerbaijan is to the benefit of America’s strategic interests.”
Those interests have left the Obama administration to wrestle with concerns about what critics say is Azerbaijan’s authoritarian rule. A monthslong crackdown on political opposition and a clampdown on freedoms of expression and assembly has concerned some human rights groups. The National Assembly has passed measures that increase prison sentences and fines for public-order offenses. In June, Mr. Aliyev signed legislation that criminalizes defamatory views posted on the Internet and allows prison sentences of up to three years. The Azerbaijani government is engaged in a “deliberate, abusive strategy to limit dissent,” Human Rights Watch said in a report in September.
Azerbaijani officials brush off the criticisms, pointing to their strong support of American interests in the region and their friendly relations with Israel. The Obama administration is monitoring developments in Azerbaijan, straddling a careful line of embracing an ally in a critical region while prodding it behind closed doors and in public to enhance freedoms. In September, the Aliyev government barred a delegation led by Mr. Melia from traveling to Azerbaijan to observe preparations for the presidential election.
“We will continue to urge respect for fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, including due process before, during and after the presidential contest,” a U.S. official said, speaking only on the condition of anonymity. The official said the administration has called on Azerbaijan to ensure “a free, fair, and transparent electoral process that reflects the will of the people.”
“I respectfully reject the wrongful claim about going to authoritarianism in Azerbaijan,” Ambassador Elin Suleymanov said. “We do not accept that. What is going on in Azerbaijan is a truly independent nation with a vibrant political system and a free-market economy.” He conceded that there is room for improvement: “Just like every nation on Earth, we are not perfect.”
Azerbaijan won independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991. In 1993, Mr. Aliyev’s father, Heydar Aliyev, was elected president. A decade later, in October 2003, the younger Mr. Aliyev was elected to succeed his ailing father. He inherited a nation on the cusp of major oil revenues and plagued by corruption. In the ensuing years, the economy improved, and with it, the standard of living.
Its human rights record aside, Azerbaijan has plenty of advocates inside the United States, including former Rep. Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican who wrote in a Washington Times op-ed last month that America must be patient with its Caspian ally.
“I know that Azerbaijan is not perfect. The Azerbaijani government is often criticized over its human rights record,” Mr. Burton wrote. “However, considering that Azerbaijan — like other former Soviet republics — has scant experience with democracy, its human rights record is better than most. In fact, Azerbaijan’s religious tolerance, inclusiveness and protection of women’s rights should be recognized.”
Mr. Burton also stressed Azerbaijan’s increasing ties with Israel. Azerbaijan’s bilateral trade with Israel reached $4 billion last year and about 40 percent of Israel’s oil imports come from Azerbaijan, he noted. And when Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov visited Israel in May, Israeli President Shimon Peres described the trip as historic.
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
- See more at: http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7702#sthash.T6T9OpbP.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment