Part 1 The White House’s New Best Friends: The Fantastical Antisemitic World Of Abdallah Bin Bayyah

gmbwatch

Abdallah Bin Bayyah

The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Watch has detailed the historic meeting recently held in the White House between Abdallah Bin Bayyah, a close associate of Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi, and Obama Administration aides and national security officials. We have further analyzed the meeting in the context of what now has clearly become the “Obama Doctrine”, a policy of fully engaging the Global Muslim Brotherhood, including both its US and foreign components. When Gayle Smith, Special Assistant to the President and National Security Council Senior Director, welcomed Sheikh Bin Bayyah to the US White House, she reportedly told him:

We asked for this meeting to learn from you and we need to be looking for new mechanisms to communicate with you and the Association of Muslim Scholars.’ She thanked the Shaykh for his efforts to bring more understanding amongst humanity.”

The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Watch would like to introduce you to some of the members of the Association of Muslim Scholars (aka International Union of Muslim Scholars) so that you might fully understand with whom exactly the White House is seeking communication. The International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) is headed by Qaradawi whose virulent anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism, as well as his support for suicide bombings in Israel, has been long covered by the GMBDW and need not be covered further here. So, we  will begin our introduction to the IUMS with the far less well-known Sheikh Bin Bayyah himself.

Syrian-born scholar Bassam Tibi has described what he calls the “pillars of Islamized antisemitism” which he says can be summed up by the following series of allegations:

• that a Jewish conspiracy against Islam has existed since 622

• that Jews want to rule the world and thus deprive Islam of its own claim to rule the world

• that Jews employ a variety of “secret” forces (such as Freemasonry) to further their goal of world domination, the chief of these being Zionism

• that since the Crusades, Jews have used Christians as their proxies

• that America is today ruled by Jews.

Former BBC journalist John Ware has recently noted that Tunisian Muslim Brotherhood leader Rachid Ghannouchi, another colleague of Sheikh Bin Bayyah’s at the IUMS, adheres to the Islamized anti-Semitism as outlined by Tibi above. Ware writes:

“Zionism,” according to Ghannouchi. Zionism “represents a secular onslaught on the heart of our Islamic nation” (i.e. Palestine), which he has portrayed as a sort of virus spreading “octopus-like over the whole planet, embracing and transforming every aspect of existence by means of its economics, communications, arts, and literature, or — more crudely — through the presence of its fleets, intelligence agencies, and the recruitment of local converts . . .”, and thereby repressing “hope for a global liberation”. Zionism, Ghannouchi has written, is “hostile to every element rooted in ethical and religious principles”, spreading godlessness, greed and materialism.

It would appear that Sheikh Abdallah Bin Bayyah also subscribes to the pillars of Islamized anti-Semitism as well.

To begin with, Sheikh Bin Bayyah is a member of the Islamic Fiqh Council (Al Majma al-Fiqhi) along with Qaradawi. The Islamic Fiqh Council (IFC) is the theological body of the Saudi Muslim World League (MWL), which established in 1962 as a means for the propagation of Saudi ”Wahabbi” Islam. Muslim Brothers played an important role in the founding of the MWL and the League, with its own long history of anti-Semitism, has always been strongly associated with the Brotherhood.. The basic position of the IFC toward the Jews can be found in a document dated 1978 and posted on the MWL website titled “The First Resolution on Freemasonry and Affiliation with It.” The document is said to represent both a discussion of Freemasonry as well as the ruling of  Islamic Shariah (Islamic Law). Space does not allow for an explanation of the reality of Freemasonry,  a fraternal organisation that traces its origins to the loose organization of medieval Stonemasonry and aptly described as the “the most misunderstood, yet popular, ‘secret society’ the world has ever known. And the most visible one.” Often the subject of fantastical conspiracy theories, the IFC has its own unique twist on the Freemasons which it calls “one of the most dangerous organizations which aim at the destruction of Islam and Muslims” and rules that anybody who associates with it is an apostate. Freemasonry according to the IFC,  which it asserts includes also the Lions and Rotary Clubs, is controlled by “higher worldwide Jewish management” with the aim of undermining Islam and which was “able to control the activities of many officials in the Arab and non-Arab countries”:  According to the IFC resolution:

7. In its origin and essence, this organization has Jewish roots and it is controlled secretly by a higher worldwide Jewish management. In its activities, it has a Zionist outlook.

8. In its real aims, it is against all religions. It undermines them in general and aims at tarnishing the religion of Islam in particular in the eyes of its followers.

9. It is always keen to select its members from the people who enjoy the outstanding academic, social, political, financial or any other status, so that it can effectively exploit their influence in their respective societies. That is why it is so keen to attract persons such as kings, presidents, ministers and senior government officials.

10. It has many branches that take different names in order to deceive and direct the people’s attention away from it. This way, it can carry out its activities under different names if it is met with resistance to the name of Freemasonry in certain environment. The branches which work under different names are most prominently known as Lions, Rotary and other outfits which harbour the sinister aims and activities that are totally against the foundations of Islam.

It has become very clear to the Islamic Fiqh Council that there is a strong relationship between Freemasonry and International Zionist Movement. That is why it was able to control the activities of many officials in the Arab and non-Arab countries, especially with regard to the issue of Palestine, obstructing their crucial roles for this great cause in the favour of Jews and International Zionist Movement.

For this and other detailed information about the sinister aims and activities of Freemasonry, the Islamic Fiqh Council decides that Freemasonry is one of the most dangerous organizations which aim at the destruction of Islam and Muslims, and that whoever associates with it, knowing its reality and objectives is an unbeliever.

Read the entire document here.

A 1999 IFC resolution resolution further expounds on these themes, asserting that secularism “aims to replace the perfect Shari’a by man-made laws and promote licentiousness, moral degradation and the destruction of noble values.” The resolution goes on to report that such secularism spread throughout the Islamic world though ideologies clearly associated by the IFC with Jews:

Third: From secularism spread destructive ideologies which invaded our countries under different names, such as racism, communism, Zionism, freemasonry, etc., which led to the dissipation of the Ummah’s resources and the deterioration of economic conditions. The result was the occupation of some of our holy lands, such as Palestine and Al-Quds. This is an indication of its failure to do our Ummah any good.

Fourth: Secularism is a man-made system based on principles of atheism which run counter to Islam, in part and whole. It converges with international Zionism and calls for licentiousness. Therefore, it is an atheist sect that is rejected by Allah and His Messenger and by all the believers.

Continuing in the same vein, in 2004 the editor of the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Watch was present during a meeting of the European Council for Fatwa and Research (ECFR), the theological body of the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe. FIOE in turn is an umbrella group representing the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe. Sheikh Bin Bayyah is a member of the ECFR and participated in the 2004 meeting where as a Wall Street Journal reporter described :

… a Council member cited “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a notorious anti-Semitic forgery written in czarist Russia, in a position paper on how Muslim families are under threat in Europe. “The Protocols, the speaker said, was evidence of a Jewish plot to undermine Muslim moral values through sexual permissiveness.”

Sheikh Bin Bayyah himself remembers the 2004 meeting at which time the founding of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) was announced. (The IUMS went on later that year to call for attacks on US troops in Iraq). Apparently what the Sheikh found worthy of remembering about the meeting was that “International Zionism” alleged to threatened the safety of himself and IUMS head Qaradawi:

At that time we faced some difficulties caused by International Zionism and some right-wingers who created disturbance and confusion against the head of the Union Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. All Praise be to Allah Alone! Such plans failed and we were safe.”

(As noted above, the GMBDW editor was present during the entire affair and can remember no incident that threatened the participants, although there was some protest in the UK at the presence of Qaradawi).

A recent ruling by Sheikh Bin Bayyah on interfaith dialog appears to be somewhat more circumspect. In a 2012 interview with the Sheikh and reported on his website (though interestingly now deleted), he says that dialog between Muslims and Jews in the USA and Europe is allowed adding that it might cause “trouble” for Muslims if they avoid it:

A single ruling on the dialogue with Jews cannot be generalized. The dialogue conducted between the Muslim and Jewish communities across Europe and USA is natural, especially if they are citizens of the same state. For the sake of coexistence, citizenship and a common interest in stabilizing their country through peace, they resort to dialogue amongst themselves. Moreover, if the Muslim communities avoid such a dialogue, this may cause them trouble.

However, Sheikh Bin Bayyah goes on to suggest that Muslims have to “distinguish between dialogue with the Jews transgressing on our land and holy places, and the Jews opposing this occupation”:

The Muslims have to distinguish between dialogue with the Jews transgressing on our land and holy places, and the Jews opposing this occupation. That is, there is a small group of Jews in the world who have a humanistic approach. This group stands strongly against the Israeli occupation and the Zionist project in the region. Hence, there is no harm in opening a channel of constructive dialogue with them to the interest of the Muslims.

The group of “humanistic” Jews referred to by Sheik Bin Bayyah is most assuredly the Neturei Karta, a small group of “anti-Zionist” rabbis close to Youssef Qaradawi and who seek the destruction of Israel. According to a Qatari newspaper report:

Speaking at a meeting with the Doha-based Muslim scholar Sheikh Yousuf al-Qaradawi, rabbis Ahron Cohen and Yisroel Dovid Weiss, who are activists at the Neturei Karta, a group known for its opposition to the establishment of Israel, said that the creation of Israel “was a heresy made up by the Zionists to undermine the true Jewish life”. “Theodor Herzel and his friends were just heretics. They are the worst enemy for the true Jews. According to the Torah, Jews are forbidden to have a state. All Jews should refuse the existence of the so-called state of Israel which tarnished our image. We will not lose hope and dream of dismantling the state of Israel,” said Weiss who called on Qaradawi at his house in Doha.

Cohen and Weiss went on to blame Zionism for bloodshed in the region calling it “the root of all the evil in the region since the establishment of Israel.” Introducing themselves as Jews but not Zionists” , they said that Zionists should not be “mistaken for Jews.” Qaradawi has appeared with the Naturei Karta rabbis in public before and calls them “a big segment of Jews opposing the Zionist entity.” However, there appears to be no evidence that the group, descended from Hungarian Jews that settled in Jerusalem’s Old City in the early nineteenth century, has any substantial membership.

Given Sheikh Bin Bayyah’s membership in the Islamic Fiqh Council which views Jews as part of a hallucinatory conspiracy to destroy Islam and Muslims, his role at the European Council for Fatwa and Research which believes the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be an authentic reference document, and his enthusiasm for a cult of rabbis that seek the destruction of Israel, the GMBDW wonders what President Obama’s aid could have possibly meant by his “efforts to bring more understanding amongst humanity” unless Jews are to be somehow excluded from the humanity’s ranks.

Part 2 of this series can be found here.

Part 3 of this series can be found here.