Sultan Knish
When the Yankees play baseball in the Bronx and the Knicks hit the court
at Madison Square Garden, the two teams may belong to different sports,
but they're both part of an exchange of taunts and slurs that no one
remembers or cares about anymore.
The
Knicks are short for the Knickerbockers, one of the derogatory names
that English New Yorkers called the Dutch New Yorkers whom they had
seized the city from. And the Dutch returned the favor by calling the
Anglo newcomers, John Cheese or Jan Kees, which eventually became
Yankee.
The English mocked the Dutch and the Dutch mocked English and then both
terms became part of the city's cultural heritage and even a point of
pride. Yankee may still have a derogatory meaning in the South and in
Europe, but in New York, it's on every other baseball cap and the Knicks
are on every other jersey; including some of the shorts that resemble
the Knickerbockers of the Dutch.
This sort of thing happens a lot in a multicultural society. What used
to be a point of insult, blends into the common cultural heritage. The
minority teenagers wearing Knicks shorts and Yankees caps care as little
about the Dutch and English slurs that got the whole thing started as
they do about the Redskins, a term that is as equally out of date and
nearly as obscure.
It shouldn't be surprising that most American Indians care as little
about the Redskins or the Braves as we care about the Yankees and the
Knicks. It's the white liberals descended from the Knickerbockers and
the John Cheeses who don't seem to grasp that a minority group might not
be offended by the same things that they aren't offended by.
Multiculturalism doesn't look a whole lot like the awkward bureaucratic
words they are expected to tote around all day. It does look a lot like
people calling each other insulting names until those names become part
of the cultural background noise. That might not be the liberal ideal,
but it's how things work in the real world.
The great battle over the N Word only resulted in the widespread use of
Black, which means the same thing in English. The use of
African-American is still confined to formal settings. The same goes for
Native-American or any other name with more letters than is good for
it.
American history is full of insulting names and nicknames whose meanings
changed until they became part of the national vocabulary. And like the
Yankees and Knicks, it goes to show that our language is shaped by
argument as much as by consensus and that sometimes the mutual insults
that we exchange are part of the process of finding common ground and
learning to live with one another.
That understanding would have been simple common sense to anyone who
grew up in the old urban melting pots, but is thoroughly alien to a
liberal elite raised in white suburban neighborhoods and exposed to
minorities for the first time in Ivy League settings alongside critical
race theory and bouts of angry activism. Instead of learning how people
get along, they learn to be the white knights riding to the rescue of
minorities who they assume always need their help because it makes them
feel good..
No Americans Indians actually need their help when it comes to the
Redskins. It's just become a toxic reflex of linguistic witchhunters who
are always out to fight the demon of intolerance whenever they can find
it. And if they can't find it, then they push and prod until they bring
it into being so that they can defeat it and win admiring cheers from
the crowd.
The firemen of tolerance are also the arsonists of intolerance. They
start the fires and then put them out. The debate over the Redskins is a
classic example of setting a fire and then declaring that they should
be able to do whatever it takes to put it out. Even if it means changing
the name of a team they don't like, in a sport they don't follow, so
that their Wikipedia entry can forever list them as the man, woman or
undersea creature who helped put right a historical injustice that
didn't exist until they started on it.
We could go into the historical origins of the Redskins name, which is
far less intolerant than Yankees or Knickerbockers, but it would mostly
be a waste of time. The history doesn't really matter. Language exists
in the present and in the present the Redskins are an iconic invocation
of a mythical history in the same way that every other Indian sports
team name is.
Liberals nurtured on Orientalism and worries about cultural
appropriation are uncomfortable with that; but that's their problem.
It's perfectly normal for the old wounds to become the bonds of a new
society. It's part of the healing process. It's post-racial and
post-everything in a good way.
When people embrace hurtful names and transform them into a common
identity, when New Yorkers of all backgrounds began calling themselves
Knickerbockers because they associated it with the history of the city
and when they jubilantly proclaimed themselves Yankees and when Redskins
fans wear feathers, those are good things because they say that these
things are part of our common identity. They don't divide us. They unite
us.
That was how the old multiculturalism worked. And it worked well. Even
liberals remember growing up in a hopeful America that played by those
rules where there was unfairness, but that unfairness was being ground
down by common contact. That America is being strangled to death by the
political correctness of a liberal elite that controls the mediums of
national dialogue through its death grip on academia and the airwaves,
but has no understanding of how people really live their lives.
The common American identity was based on the integration of the good
and the bad, the loves and the hates, the resentments and the joys, it
combines the high and low points of culture, it mixed together
aspirations and slurs, baked it together into something strange and
wonderful.
There is no American identity now in the public space. There are
Americans, including those of all races who share a common identity, but
they have been locked out by a coalition of angry white liberals and
their minority allies who have hijacked the public space for a divisive
fractured identity based on resentment and greed. Instead of finding
common ground, they are always finding fault.
National unity has become outdated. Instead we are treated to a festival
of resentments. Every identity is cut down and sharpened into a weapon.
Identity politics is short on richness of culture and long on grudges.
Not only is the national culture being torn down, but it's being
replaced by phony micro-cultures whose only content is resentment over a
thousand imagined slights. These cultural charades fill their gaps and
lack of depth with more angry outcries and claims of oppression.
Liberal political correctness is obsessively consumed with the
destruction of any common culture not mediated by their commissars.
Their divisive efforts seem calculated to break down any areas where
co-existence occurs because the great threat to their political power
would come from the revelation that they are not the firemen of
tolerance, they are the arsonists of intolerance, setting groups at each
other and then stepping in to referee the results.
America doesn't need racial referees. It needs some breathing room and
time for the force of history to do its work and grind down old grudges
and resentments until they are as obscure as the origin of Yankees and
Knickerbockers, both terms that have faded far enough to be subjects of
academic dispute.
The
Redskins don't need to change their name. Their liberal critics need to
change their tactics and stop picking fights for their own political
profit that they pretend are actually being fought for a minority group
that never asked for their help.
If liberals really care about helping American Indians, they can start
with problems like broken families, drug abuse, the adoption of Indian
children and corruption within tribal society. But those are big
problems with few easy solutions and nothing to them that will make
liberalism's white knights feel good about themselves.
But let's not pretend that the Redskins debate is about helping American
Indians. It's about the selfish egotism of the white knights whose
Camelot was the corrupt Kennedy White House and whose round table is a
Twitter hashtag where everyone denounces white privilege in unison while
embodying it.
Meanwhile the Yankees and the Knickerbockers and the Redskins will go on
playing as a reminder that old grudges die when we embrace the things
that used to divide us and turn them from a Liberal fetish of
resentments into a source of strength for the American Tribe.
No comments:
Post a Comment