Friday, October 11, 2013

The art of foot dragging and deception

It is hard to ignore this week's Wall Street Journal report that Iran is prepared to stop enriching uranium for military purposes, particularly amid the backdrop of the historic Obama-Rouhani phone conversation two weeks ago. Indeed, after 34 years of Khomeini ideology, during which the Iranian regime severed all ties with the United States, the phone call was extremely important. Following the call, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sensed that the West's policy toward Iran, which he had devoted so much work to over the years, was slipping away and crumbling at Israel's feet.

It is important to first examine the American interest behind speaking with Iran's president. The U.S. understood that the policy it had conducted and sought in the Middle East was not up to date, foolish even. The rise of Russia on America's broken back, fostered by the crisis in Syria (and following U.S. crises in Iraq and Afghanistan), caused the Americans to understand that if Russia (and China) support the actions of the Syrian regime and serve as its financial, military and political patrons, what would then happen if and when the U.S. needs to threaten Iran with a military strike as it did against Syria?


Iran, for its part, identified the American weakness, and it perceives the mere existence of holding the phone conversation as an act of bravery stemming from a place of strength and prestige. It cannot be argued that the Revolutionary Guard condemned the renewed communication with the U.S. because it was concerned about losing control of certain market monopolies it had seized due to the economic sanctions. Other elements inside Iran, like Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, saw the phone call as unnecessary and inappropriate. Either way, it is certain that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei wholeheartedly supported it.

But will this phone call kick start a process whereby Iran will sit at the negotiation table to discuss its nuclear program, and in exchange the West will ease the burden of the economic sanctions it has imposed? There are several insights to this question. Firstly, the sanctions are indeed working and making an influence, specifically on the nuclear issue. The Iranian people do not lack for medicine or basic products -- and while the quality may be Chinese and Korean, at the end of the day no one is dying of starvation. Secondly, it can be assumed that Iran has enough enriched uranium to build a bomb. The removal of sanctions will only be the wrapping on the West's gift to Iran, and Iran's nuclear bomb will be the present itself. Thirdly, Iranian President Hasan Rouhani, along with the rest of the regime's leaders, are making a mockery of the American administration and stalling for more time, just as they did in the past and will continue to do in the future. 

The West is forgetting one thing: More than any other politician in Iran, Rouhani is recognized as the most uncompromising figure in regards to acquiring nuclear capabilities. It is enough to leaf through the dozens of books and articles he has written and peruse the regime's official websites.

The Geneva talks between Iran and the six world powers will be devoid of content, because the Iran of today will never relinquish its right to go nuclear. Twenty percent more or less -- Iran has over 20 nuclear facilities operating at varying levels of production. The entire purpose of this process is to buy more time and to create a false impression of coming closer to the West. Meanwhile, Iran -- simultaneous to the negotiations, the removal of sanctions and the supposed supervision of its nuclear sites -- will continue, with the international approval of the six world powers, to do what it has been doing for many years: strive toward nuclear capability, civilian and military.
The writer is a lecturer at the Department of Middle Eastern & Israel Studies/Political Science and research associate at the Middle East Research Center at Ariel University.

No comments: