No emotional dissonance for me on
the situation with the PA/PLO. The emotions I feel are anything but
positive, but I am unconflicted.
Deputy Minister of Defense Danny
Danon (Likud) has been calling it straight.
Credit:
Haaretz
And that certainly applies to this
particular situation:
"We have to freeze the
negotiations until [Abbas]...and the Palestinian leadership condemn the
terrorist incidents of the last few days. I told the prime minister that
he cannot negotiate with those who support terror." (Emphasis
added.)
http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Israelis-Palestinians-trade-barbs-but-peace-talks-are-not-derailed-326897
That we can not -- and should
not -- negotiate with the Palestinian Authority in its current
formulation seems to me a no-brainer.
~~~~~~~~~~
To gain a more complete picture of
what the PA leadership is like, consider the following. It is far worse
than their refusing to condemn those Palestinian Arabs who committed the
terrorist attacks of the last few days (more on this below):
Abbas Zaki, a member of the Fatah
Central Committee (Fatah, remember, being the political mainstay of the
Palestinian Authority), has charged that what the sniper in Hevron did is
the fault of the Israeli government:
"The soldier was not on a picnic
in Hebron."
Darn right he wasn't. Sgt.
Kobi was stationed in Hevron, along with other members of the IDF, to protect
the thousands of Jews who came for Sukkot.
And of
course, the Palestinian Arabs who were throwing rocks and Molotov
cocktails not far from where Kobi was standing were doing so for peaceful
reasons.
The core issue here -- and the
reason for the rioting -- is the presence of Jews in large numbers in
Hevron.
~~~~~~~~~~
Then there is Abbas spokesman
Nabil Abu Rudaineh, who said that Israel is continuing to "kill
Palestinians in Kalandiya, Jenin and Gaza."
(All quotes are from the
JPost article above.)
This is
surreal. Not only does the PA leadership lie and misrepresent on
a regular basis, they are totally without shame as they turn the truth on its
head.
Let us look just very briefly at
how Israel is treating the Palestinian Arabs in Gaza:
Since the takeover of Gaza by
Hamas, Israel had limited building materials going from Israel to Gaza via
crossing points because they are "double use" items -- for example,
concrete could be used for building schools but could also be used for
making bunkers for rockets, metal bars could be used in reinforcing those school
buildings or could be melted down for rocket construction.
Most of the building material
brought into Gaza was via the tunnels from the Sinai. But now the Sinai
connection has been cut off by the Egyptian military. And just one
week ago, Israel lifted the restriction on importing building materials into
Gaza: Now 350 truckloads of materials will be allowed into Gaza weekly -- an
increase of 250 truckloads -- in order "to increase employment and
strengthen the private sector in the Gaza Strip."
What is more, last week Ministry
of Defense spokesman Guy Inbar announced that Israel will be selling more water
to the PA for use in Gaza. Actually, Israel will be building a pipeline
that allows double the current amount of water to be piped from Israel into
Gaza.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-17/israel-to-double-supply-of-water-to-thirsty-gaza-strip.html
Reports indicated that Israel made
these moves after "consultation with the international community," which means
under duress from the US and the EU. Tony Blair, Quartet envoy, said that
these steps would create "a more positive atmosphere."
These are some more of
those "gestures of good will" made in an attempt to generate
constructive negotiations.
One could probably make a very
good case that we are certifiable for doing this. But if we're nuts,
it's benignly so, with regard to how we are treating the Palestinian
Arabs. Not so benign, perhaps, with regard to how we protect
ourselves. We give altogether too much, with no return.
Now to have a spokesman for Abbas
accusing us of "killing Palestinians" -- as if we routinely go around taking
Palestinian Arabs out -- is insufferable. Israel should have a Red Line
here, in terms of what is tolerated. It is time for Netanyahu to
stand up and say: "ENOUGH! You are not a partner for peace and
we are withdrawing from negotiations."
~~~~~~~~~~
I wrote recently about a Hamas
prediction that a new intifada was coming. Now hear from Khaled Abu
Toameh on this subject, in "A New Intifada?" (emphasis added):
"The resumption of the
U.S.-sponsored negotiations has been accompanied by increased calls from
Palestinians to launch a new intifada against Israel.
"Calls have been coming not only from Hamas and other extremist groups, but also from Palestinians representing various PLO groups in the West Bank, including Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's own Fatah faction.
"Earlier this week, representatives of several Palestinian groups met in Ramallah and launched a public campaign to stop the negotiations and wage an intifada against Israel.
"That the meeting was held a few hundred meters away from Abbas's headquarters is significant. It shows that opposition to the peace talks is not only coming from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, but also from the largely secular and relatively moderate city of Ramallah.
"A few days earlier, a group of masked men marched in the city calling for a third intifada against Israel. The Palestinian Authority police did not intervene to stop them because, Palestinians say, they were Abbas loyalists from Fatah.
"Calls for a new uprising against Israel are also being issued by senior officials of Fatah in the West Bank. These officials argue that stepping up the 'popular resistance' against Israel is possible even as the peace talks continue.
"'Popular resistance will increase pressure on the Israeli government and draw the world's attention to the conflict,' explained a top Fatah official.
"By supporting a new intifada against Israel, Fatah is seeking to send a message to its critics that, despite Abbas's decision to resume the peace talks with Israel, its members have not abandoned the option of violence as a way of extracting concessions from the Israeli government.
"That is perhaps why Fatah's armed wing, Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, rushed to claim responsibility for the killing of the two IDF soldiers in Kalkiliya and Hebron.
"After the killing of the soldier in Hebron by a sniper, Fatah published a photo of one of its sharpshooters with the caption, 'When Fatah says, it does. When Fatah promises, it fulfills.'
"It is worth noting that the Fatah leadership has refrained from distancing itself from the claims of its armed wing.
"Moreover, the Palestinian Authority has stopped short of issuing any form of condemnation for the killing of the soldiers.
"Instead, the Palestinian Authority itself has been involved in a massive campaign of incitement against Israel.
"While some Palestinian Authority officials have come out in public in support of escalating 'popular resistance' against Israel, others have been telling Palestinians that 'extremist Jewish gangs are storming and contaminating the Aqsa Mosque' -- a reference to routine visits by Jews to the Temple Mount.
"These are the kind of statements that prompt young Palestinians to take to the streets and throw stones and petrol bombs at Jewish settlers and IDF soldiers.
"Although Abbas and some of his aides have been telling Israelis, Americans and Europeans that they are opposed to violence and terror attacks against Israel, they continue to incite Palestinians against Israel on a daily basis."
"Calls have been coming not only from Hamas and other extremist groups, but also from Palestinians representing various PLO groups in the West Bank, including Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's own Fatah faction.
"Earlier this week, representatives of several Palestinian groups met in Ramallah and launched a public campaign to stop the negotiations and wage an intifada against Israel.
"That the meeting was held a few hundred meters away from Abbas's headquarters is significant. It shows that opposition to the peace talks is not only coming from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, but also from the largely secular and relatively moderate city of Ramallah.
"A few days earlier, a group of masked men marched in the city calling for a third intifada against Israel. The Palestinian Authority police did not intervene to stop them because, Palestinians say, they were Abbas loyalists from Fatah.
"Calls for a new uprising against Israel are also being issued by senior officials of Fatah in the West Bank. These officials argue that stepping up the 'popular resistance' against Israel is possible even as the peace talks continue.
"'Popular resistance will increase pressure on the Israeli government and draw the world's attention to the conflict,' explained a top Fatah official.
"By supporting a new intifada against Israel, Fatah is seeking to send a message to its critics that, despite Abbas's decision to resume the peace talks with Israel, its members have not abandoned the option of violence as a way of extracting concessions from the Israeli government.
"That is perhaps why Fatah's armed wing, Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, rushed to claim responsibility for the killing of the two IDF soldiers in Kalkiliya and Hebron.
"After the killing of the soldier in Hebron by a sniper, Fatah published a photo of one of its sharpshooters with the caption, 'When Fatah says, it does. When Fatah promises, it fulfills.'
"It is worth noting that the Fatah leadership has refrained from distancing itself from the claims of its armed wing.
"Moreover, the Palestinian Authority has stopped short of issuing any form of condemnation for the killing of the soldiers.
"Instead, the Palestinian Authority itself has been involved in a massive campaign of incitement against Israel.
"While some Palestinian Authority officials have come out in public in support of escalating 'popular resistance' against Israel, others have been telling Palestinians that 'extremist Jewish gangs are storming and contaminating the Aqsa Mosque' -- a reference to routine visits by Jews to the Temple Mount.
"These are the kind of statements that prompt young Palestinians to take to the streets and throw stones and petrol bombs at Jewish settlers and IDF soldiers.
"Although Abbas and some of his aides have been telling Israelis, Americans and Europeans that they are opposed to violence and terror attacks against Israel, they continue to incite Palestinians against Israel on a daily basis."
~~~~~~~~~~
While Fatah
officials think it's possible to encourage "popular resistance" and continue
negotiations at the same time, Israeli officials must make it clear that this is
not an option. That Israel has "protested" to the US about continued PA
violence and incitement is worthless. ENOUGH!
We need to hold our
heads up and respect our national dignity. Not be taken for
fools.
~~~~~~~~~~
As to charges by
Abu Rudaineh that we are killing Palestinians in places such as Kalandiya,
I backup to refer to incidents from last month:
In late August, IDF
soldiers from an Artillery Corps battalion and elite border police officers
entered the Kalandiya UNRWA refugee camp, located between Jerusalem and
Ramallah, at 5 AM, to arrest a security suspect -- a member of Tanzim
identified as a senior terrorist figure who dealt in weapons. Twice before he
had escaped attempts to arrest him.
This time the Israeli
security forces gave chase when he bolted from his home, and then found
themselves surrounded by some 300 Palestinian Arabs. A riot broke out and
the mob began throwing concrete slabs at the soldiers. Non-lethal means of
dispersing the rioters was unsuccessful. The mob grew in size and the
violence increased: According to an Israeli security source, Israeli forces were
being showered with life-threatening objects from rooftops, including washing
machines, bathtubs, refrigerators, blocks and carpets set on fire "that landed
on jeeps and could have set them ablaze." Some in the crowd also opened
fire on the jeeps.
In the end, the
soldiers, feeling that their lives were endangered, opened fire. Three in the
rioting mob were killed.
The IDF investigated
and found that the soldiers had followed rules of engagement and acted
properly.
Abbas called this
an "assassination."
~~~~~~~~~~
Also in late
August, a similar incident occurred in the city of Jenin, when Israeli security
forces carried out a pre-dawn raid to arrest terror suspects. Here,
too, they were set upon by a Palestinian Arab mob that threw rocks and empty
bottles. The Israeli forces responded with rubber bullets and tear
gas. Ultimately, there was an exchange of gunfire, with the Palestinian
Arabs also throwing explosives. One Palestinian Arab was
killed.
~~~~~~~~~~
I reported with
pleasure on the announcement by Netanyahu that Jews would now be able to move
into Beit Hamachpela. Seems there has now been a backtrack.
A lawyer for a number
of Arab families has petitioned the Court to stop Jews from moving in,
claiming that there was still a period of time permitted for challenging
ownership of the building by Jews. It's beyond me, folks, as I understood
that a court had determined that papers held by the Jews were
legitimate.
Today the State [the
Netanyahu administration] told the Court that "no decision has been made to
give
possession of the building anyone" and no decision would be made until a review process on the matter was completed. Ouch!
possession of the building anyone" and no decision would be made until a review process on the matter was completed. Ouch!
See Aaron Lerner,
director of IMRA, on this: http://imra.org.il/story.php3?id=61954. If I learn more in due course that makes any sense,
I will report on it.
~~~~~~~~~~
As to Abbas
apologizing, I have this to report, also from IMRA:
According to Benny
Avni reporting on Israel Radio, in a meeting Abbas had with Jewish leaders
in New York on Monday night, he said -- addressing the issue of the slain
soldiers for the first time:
"I condemn this act
and all other acts against civilians."
Aaron Lerner points
out that, if the report, in Hebrew, was correct, then Abbas's statement
contained an internal contradiction -- for those murdered were not civilians.
I would carry this
further: A statement to a selective audience of Jewish leaders, made in
New York City, does not properly qualify as a condemnation. Such a
condemnation would have to be made in this region at a press conference or
via press release. Properly, it should be made in Arabic, so that his own
people would know that he condemned the murders (which, of course, he does
not).
Then, setting up an
artificial moral equivalency, he said he expected Israel to condemn the
recent killings of Palestinian Arabs by Israeli security forces. Israel
should condemn the fact that her soldiers, when faced with slabs of
concrete and even washing machines being thrown at them from rooftops, fired at
their attackers to protect their lives.
~~~~~~~~~~
I began this post by
citing Danny Danon, and I cite him again here, with regard to the statement he
made following President Obama's speech at the UN today:
"If this is the way
the wind is blowing at present from Obama, an enormous amount of pressure will
be certain to follow."
Indeed!
And then:
"I'm sure that the Prime
Minister will present Israel's position in the spirit of
Jabotinsky's Iron Wall - a powerful combination of determination and stability
will ensure the strength of the State of Israel,"
Let us pray so.
~~~~~~~~~~
Obama's speech was filled
with platitudes and undeserved back-patting. Consider (emphasis
added): "Next year, an international coalition
will end its war in Afghanistan, having achieved its mission of
dismantling the core of al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11."
Really now? So, as long as al Qaeda has moved on to other places, that's
OK?
I'm going to skip over that part
of his talk. His major topics, both of which require a careful look,
are Iran and Israeli-Palestinian Arab relations. In the main, I want to
table the Iranian topic for now -- with intention to pick it up in my next post
-- and focus on what he says about Israel/negotiations/a Palestinian
state. (All emphasis is added.)
Danon's comment about pressure was
surely a response to this:
"We are also determined to
resolve a conflict that goes back even further than our differences
with Iran, and that is the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis."
What happened to Obama's position
that "we cannot want it more than the parties themselves do." Just
precisely how do "they" intend to resolve a conflict between other
parties? This sets off loud alarms regarding implied
coercion.
~~~~~~~~~~
And how does he come to
this: "I believe there’s
a growing recognition within Israel that the occupation of the West Bank
is tearing at the democratic fabric of the Jewish state."
First, that word, "occupation,"
used pointedly, and erroneously, here and elsewhere in his talk.
There is no occupation. Just today I had a discussion
with a reader regarding my intention to provide further information on Israeli
rights. There is no way to do full justice to this here and now, with the
length of this posting. But it is coming -- and soon.
What Obama calls "the West Bank,"
which is Judea and Samaria (Yehuda v'Shomron), represents the ancient heritage
of the Jewish people -- the core of what we are as a people. How can we
"occupy" this? We are talking about Hevron, with the Machpela, which
cave our father Avraham purchased. And Shilo, where the Tabernacle
rested. And Jerusalem, where two Temples stood. And more and more
and more...
~~~~~~~~~~
There is also our historical/legal
right in modern times -- the San Remo Conference and the Palestinian Mandate,
conferred on Britain by the League of Nations, so that a homeland for the
Jewish people could be established in all of Palestine (with human rights but
not national rights accorded other groups). Legally binding in
international law, this has not been superseded.
There is the fact that Israel
acquired Judea and Samaria in a defensive war, and that there was no legal
sovereignty in that area prior to Israel's liberation of it. There is UN
Security Council Resolution 242, which does not require Israel to return to the
'49 armistice line (i.e., the Green Line).
What is clear here is that Obama
adheres, still, to the Palestinian Arab position: that everything beyond the
Green Line is part of a "Palestinian state." And that spells
trouble.
~~~~~~~~~~
He also has it wrong regarding
"growing recognition within Israel" regarding "the occupation" being
destructive. He likes to do this -- to set what he claims is the "Israeli
view" against the view of an Netanyahu administration represented as being
obstinate and out of touch. Fact is that more and more Israelis see that a
Palestinian state is not in Israel's best interest.
~~~~~~~~~~
"...the United States remains
committed to the belief that the Palestinian people have a right to live with
security and dignity in their own sovereign state."
Aaron Lerner's comment here:
President Obama juxtaposed America's commitment to Israel's security with the
requirement of Palestinian "dignity.' Israel has many critical security
requirements that the Palestinians assert do not jibe with Palestinian
'dignity.'
"This raises another interesting
question: what of Jewish 'dignity'? Do we Jews also have the right to 'dignity'
or is our 'dignity' something that can be forfeited?"
~~~~~~~~~~
"So the time is now ripe for the entire international community to get behind the pursuit of peace."
More loud alarm bells. Translation: folks, come help me apply the pressure.
"Already, Israeli and Palestinian leaders have demonstrated a willingness to take significant political risks." Give me a break! I've amply demonstrated just how willing Abbas is.
~~~~~~~~~~
"All of us must recognize that peace will be a powerful tool to defeat extremists throughout the region..."
~~~~~~~~~~
"So the time is now ripe for the entire international community to get behind the pursuit of peace."
More loud alarm bells. Translation: folks, come help me apply the pressure.
"Already, Israeli and Palestinian leaders have demonstrated a willingness to take significant political risks." Give me a break! I've amply demonstrated just how willing Abbas is.
~~~~~~~~~~
"All of us must recognize that peace will be a powerful tool to defeat extremists throughout the region..."
This man is a clown! Hamas
is waiting, with ill-disguised eagerness, to take over a Palestinian state. The
ONLY thing that keeps terrorists at bay now is the conduct of Israeli security
forces in Judea and Samaria. Above, I gave two examples of Israeli
security raids to capture suspected terrorists. My friends, this goes on
nightly. If there is a sovereign Palestinian state (Heaven forbid!) and
the IDF cannot move in, those extremists will have a field day.
In Gaza right now, Hamas is the
most moderate of the Islamic movements -- much worse (including al Qaeda)
is present. The same would adhere in a Palestinian state: It would be
a headquarters, a training ground for radicalism.
Short-sighted, biased
fools in the world, some of whom head governments, refuse to acknowledge that it
is Israel that keeps the peace.
~~~~~~~~~~
Lastly for now, this:
"Real breakthroughs on
these two issues -- Iran’s nuclear program, and Israeli-Palestinian peace --
would have a profound and positive impact on the entire Middle East and North
Africa."
How dare he? How dare he
juxtapose these two issues, implying that they are of the same import and that
each is equally a threat to the Middle East?
The entire speech can be found http://www.timesofisrael.com/full-text-of-obamas-2013-speech-at-un-general-assembly/
~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment