Robert Spencer
In WND this morning I explain how I wrote my new book, Did Muhammad Exist?, out of respect for Muslims:
My new book, “Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s
Obscure Origins,” is out this week, and it has already aroused anger
among Muslims: A Muslim writer named Hussein Rashid, who is an
instructor at the Center for Spiritual Inquiry at Park Avenue Christian
Church, fulminated in Religion Dispatches that my book on Muhammad will
win praise only from the “Islamophobia industry” – as if the book itself
were a manifestation of hatred and bigotry.
I’m reminded of the words of the Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh as the
Islamic jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri began sawing his head off in
retaliation for his film “Submission” about the plight of Muslim women:
“Can’t we talk about this?” No, we can’t. In America, speaking unpopular
truths about Islam won’t get you murdered, but it will get you
consigned to the outer darkness, where hatemongers and bigots weep and
gnash their teeth. Many people wouldn’t dare write (or read) a book
entitled “Did Muhammad Exist?” for fear of getting Muslims angry and
getting called names.
I, on the other hand, am determined to respect Muslims
and treat them as adults. In fact, that’s why I wrote “Did Muhammad
Exist?” – for I believe that even in the politically correct United
States of 2012, we should be able to discuss in an adult manner the
historical evidence for and against the existence of Muhammad. The
Scriptures and religious figures of Judaism and Christianity have been
subjected to searching historical scrutiny since the 18th century. No
one riots, no one threatens, no one gets killed as a result of these
investigations – no one rails against the “Judeophobia industry” or
“Christianophobia industry.” To be sure, some historical critics have
been motivated by an animus toward the religion they’re studying, but no
one in the West is interfering with their right to undertake such
study. Only around Islam does the scholarly community walk on eggshells.
It’s time to stop. Not only should the quest for the historical
Muhammad be carried on in our nation’s universities, but we should dare
to treat Muslims as adults in other ways as well. Instead of politically
correct obfuscation about the political and supremacist aspects of
Islam, there should be a vigorous public debate about the ways in which
Islamic law, Shariah, is incompatible with pluralistic democracy, and
the ways in which Islam is incompatible with Western ideas of human
rights.
Moreover, as adults we ought not to have to make patronizing
references to the “Noble People of Afghanistan,” as Gen. John Allen did
in his embarrassingly obsequious apology to the Afghans for the
inadvertent burning of Qurans on a NATO base. As adults we ought not to
have to pretend that the “Arab Spring” is a glorious flowering of
freedom when in fact it is a series of pro-Shariah Islamic-supremacist
takeovers....more, click here
No comments:
Post a Comment