How effective is the United Nations at tackling genocide? When it happens or is about to happen, its peacekeeping forces usually find a good reason to be somewhere else. And the Security Council and General Assembly find some pressing Israeli matter to concentrate on. But what about after the fact?
The United Nations boasts of leading the charge against genocide through its tribunals. Warlords and generals who commit mass murder are supposed to fear the wrath of the international community. But how much wrath is there to fear?
Thirty years ago, the Khmer Rouge
Communist Party carried out one of the bloodiest reigns of terror in the region
causing the deaths of millions.
During the Cambodian Genocide,
the UN Security Council did not issue a single resolution on it. But it did
find time to issue a string of resolutions on Israel. While millions were dying, the UN
occupied itself with condemning the Israeli expulsion of the Sharia judge of
Hebron and the United States for allowing former members of the Rhodesian government
to enter the country.
It was not UN action, but the
Vietnamese invasion that finally put an end to the worst of the terror. But the
United Nations, after being approached by the Cambodian government nearly two
decades later, finally got down to the task of trying some of those involved
for genocide.
And here is the rest of it, click here
No comments:
Post a Comment